Using the voice of the student to identify perceptions of teaching effectiveness attributes: a pilot study

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
E. Cudney, Somer G. Anderson, Robbie Beane, S. Furterer, Lakshmy Mohandas, C. Laux
{"title":"Using the voice of the student to identify perceptions of teaching effectiveness attributes: a pilot study","authors":"E. Cudney, Somer G. Anderson, Robbie Beane, S. Furterer, Lakshmy Mohandas, C. Laux","doi":"10.1108/qae-10-2022-0187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nTeaching effectiveness is essential to student learning, engagement and success. This study aims to identify the perceived teaching effectiveness attributes from the student’s perspective through a pilot study.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA comprehensive literature review identified 6 demographic and 25 teaching effectiveness characteristics. The Kano model was used to gather and analyze the student’s voices. The research validated the survey instrument using Cronbach’s alpha to ensure internal consistency and Chi-square goodness of fit to test the data distribution. Differences in response patterns were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Furthermore, the magnitude of the effect between the teaching effectiveness attributes was determined using Cramer’s V test.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study determined that students perceived 19 attributes as one-dimensional, 3 as indifferent, 2 as attractive and 1 as one-dimensional and attractive. The analysis found differences in response patterns concerning readings and materials, grading rubrics to set assignment expectations and group/teamwork on projects.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nAs a pilot study, the sample size was small. Additional research should validate the survey using a larger sample. While the study results are specific to the college surveyed, other educators can use the methodology to identify the attributes important to their students.\n\n\nPractical implications\nCategorizing attributes based on the student’s voice enables instructors to focus on attributes that will improve the learning experience.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research provides a comprehensive methodology for identifying critical teaching effectiveness attributes from the student’s perspective.\n","PeriodicalId":46734,"journal":{"name":"QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-10-2022-0187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Teaching effectiveness is essential to student learning, engagement and success. This study aims to identify the perceived teaching effectiveness attributes from the student’s perspective through a pilot study. Design/methodology/approach A comprehensive literature review identified 6 demographic and 25 teaching effectiveness characteristics. The Kano model was used to gather and analyze the student’s voices. The research validated the survey instrument using Cronbach’s alpha to ensure internal consistency and Chi-square goodness of fit to test the data distribution. Differences in response patterns were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Furthermore, the magnitude of the effect between the teaching effectiveness attributes was determined using Cramer’s V test. Findings This study determined that students perceived 19 attributes as one-dimensional, 3 as indifferent, 2 as attractive and 1 as one-dimensional and attractive. The analysis found differences in response patterns concerning readings and materials, grading rubrics to set assignment expectations and group/teamwork on projects. Research limitations/implications As a pilot study, the sample size was small. Additional research should validate the survey using a larger sample. While the study results are specific to the college surveyed, other educators can use the methodology to identify the attributes important to their students. Practical implications Categorizing attributes based on the student’s voice enables instructors to focus on attributes that will improve the learning experience. Originality/value This research provides a comprehensive methodology for identifying critical teaching effectiveness attributes from the student’s perspective.
利用学生的声音识别对教学效果属性的感知:一项试点研究
目的教学有效性对学生的学习、参与和成功至关重要。本研究旨在通过一项试点研究,从学生的角度识别感知教学有效性属性。设计/方法论/方法综合文献综述确定了6个人口统计学特征和25个教学有效性特征。卡诺模型被用来收集和分析学生的声音。该研究使用Cronbachα来确保内部一致性,并使用卡方拟合优度来测试数据分布,从而验证了调查工具。使用Fisher精确检验分析反应模式的差异。此外,使用Cramer的V检验确定了教学效果属性之间的影响程度。发现这项研究确定,学生认为19种属性是一维的,3种是冷漠的,2种是有吸引力的,1种是一维的有吸引力的。分析发现,在阅读和材料、设定作业期望的评分准则以及项目团队合作方面的反应模式存在差异。研究局限性/含义作为一项试点研究,样本量很小。额外的研究应该使用更大的样本来验证调查。虽然研究结果是针对被调查的大学的,但其他教育工作者可以使用该方法来确定对学生重要的属性。实际含义根据学生的声音对属性进行分类,使教师能够专注于改善学习体验的属性。原创性/价值本研究提供了一种从学生角度识别批判性教学有效性属性的综合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: QAE publishes original empirical or theoretical articles on Quality Assurance issues, including dimensions and indicators of Quality and Quality Improvement, as applicable to education at all levels, including pre-primary, primary, secondary, higher and professional education. Periodically, QAE also publishes systematic reviews, research syntheses and assessment policy articles on topics of current significance. As an international journal, QAE seeks submissions on topics that have global relevance. Article submissions could pertain to the following areas integral to QAE''s mission: -organizational or program development, change and improvement -educational testing or assessment programs -evaluation of educational innovations, programs and projects -school efficiency assessments -standards, reforms, accountability, accreditation, and audits in education -tools, criteria and methods for examining or assuring quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信