Applicability of the formation factor for different alternative binder types investigated on mortars

IF 1.1 4区 材料科学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Corrosion Pub Date : 2023-02-25 DOI:10.5006/4238
R. Achenbach, M. Raupach
{"title":"Applicability of the formation factor for different alternative binder types investigated on mortars","authors":"R. Achenbach, M. Raupach","doi":"10.5006/4238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The high energy demand and associated CO<sub>2</sub> emissions to produce Portland cement (OPC) create the need for alternative types of binders that can be produced in a more environmentally friendly manner. These alternative binders either have a reduced OPC content or can be produced entirely without the use of OPC clinker. To allow their widespread use also in reinforced concrete components, these binders must meet the same durability requirements as types of cement that have already been standardized. This requires a thorough characterization of the materials and, in addition, a verification of the applicability of the evaluation criteria known from the traditional binders. One of the most important factors influencing the transport processes in the material and therefore the durability, is the penetration resistance of the pore structure for aggressive species, such as chloride ions. One key parameter for describing the pore structure is the formation factor (FF), which is used for various applications to evaluate durability. It is determined based on the ratio of the electrical resistivity of the concrete and of the pore solution. In this study, mortars produced with different alternative binders are characterized in terms of their formation factor and pore size distribution. In addition, chloride migration coefficients determined by the Rapid Chloride Migration (RCM) test are related to the formation factor. The test program includes nine different alternative binders and two reference cements: In addition to a CEM I and CEM III/B, two calcined clays and a modified steel mill slag were investigated as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), as well as a calcium sulphoaluminate (CSA) cement and a calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) binder. Four materials belong to the group of alkali-activated mortars: Two geopolymers and two alkali-activated slags were investigated here. It is shown that both, the AC resistances and the conductivities of the pore solutions, differ greatly among the mortars investigated. The formation factor is a suitable parameter for a simplified estimation of the chloride penetration resistance of the investigated alternative binders, provided that realistic values of the pore solution conductivities are determined and used for the calculations.","PeriodicalId":10717,"journal":{"name":"Corrosion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corrosion","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5006/4238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The high energy demand and associated CO2 emissions to produce Portland cement (OPC) create the need for alternative types of binders that can be produced in a more environmentally friendly manner. These alternative binders either have a reduced OPC content or can be produced entirely without the use of OPC clinker. To allow their widespread use also in reinforced concrete components, these binders must meet the same durability requirements as types of cement that have already been standardized. This requires a thorough characterization of the materials and, in addition, a verification of the applicability of the evaluation criteria known from the traditional binders. One of the most important factors influencing the transport processes in the material and therefore the durability, is the penetration resistance of the pore structure for aggressive species, such as chloride ions. One key parameter for describing the pore structure is the formation factor (FF), which is used for various applications to evaluate durability. It is determined based on the ratio of the electrical resistivity of the concrete and of the pore solution. In this study, mortars produced with different alternative binders are characterized in terms of their formation factor and pore size distribution. In addition, chloride migration coefficients determined by the Rapid Chloride Migration (RCM) test are related to the formation factor. The test program includes nine different alternative binders and two reference cements: In addition to a CEM I and CEM III/B, two calcined clays and a modified steel mill slag were investigated as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), as well as a calcium sulphoaluminate (CSA) cement and a calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) binder. Four materials belong to the group of alkali-activated mortars: Two geopolymers and two alkali-activated slags were investigated here. It is shown that both, the AC resistances and the conductivities of the pore solutions, differ greatly among the mortars investigated. The formation factor is a suitable parameter for a simplified estimation of the chloride penetration resistance of the investigated alternative binders, provided that realistic values of the pore solution conductivities are determined and used for the calculations.
不同替代粘结剂类型的形成因子在砂浆上的适用性研究
生产波特兰水泥(OPC)的高能源需求和相关的二氧化碳排放导致需要以更环保的方式生产替代类型的粘合剂。这些替代粘结剂要么降低了OPC含量,要么可以完全不使用OPC熟料生产。为了使其广泛应用于钢筋混凝土构件,这些粘合剂必须满足与已经标准化的水泥类型相同的耐久性要求。这需要对材料进行彻底的表征,此外,还需要验证从传统粘合剂中已知的评价标准的适用性。影响材料中传输过程和耐久性的最重要因素之一是孔隙结构对侵略性物质(如氯离子)的渗透阻力。描述孔隙结构的一个关键参数是地层因子(FF),它在各种应用中用于评估耐久性。它是根据混凝土的电阻率和孔隙溶液的比率来确定的。在本研究中,用不同的可选粘结剂生产的砂浆在其形成因子和孔径分布方面进行了表征。此外,通过快速氯化物迁移(RCM)测试确定的氯化物迁移系数与地层因素有关。测试项目包括九种不同的替代粘合剂和两种参考水泥:除了CEM I和CEM III/B之外,还研究了两种煅烧粘土和一种改性钢渣作为补充胶凝材料(SCMs),以及硫铝酸钙(CSA)水泥和水化硅酸钙(C-S-H)粘合剂。碱活性砂浆属四种材料:本文研究了两种地聚合物和两种碱活性矿渣。结果表明,在不同的砂浆中,孔溶液的交流电阻和电导率差异很大。地层因子是简化估计所研究的替代粘合剂的氯离子渗透阻力的合适参数,前提是确定了孔隙溶液电导率的真实值并用于计算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Corrosion
Corrosion MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
97
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: CORROSION is the premier research journal featuring peer-reviewed technical articles from the world’s top researchers and provides a permanent record of progress in the science and technology of corrosion prevention and control. The scope of the journal includes the latest developments in areas of corrosion metallurgy, mechanisms, predictors, cracking (sulfide stress, stress corrosion, hydrogen-induced), passivation, and CO2 corrosion. 70+ years and over 7,100 peer-reviewed articles with advances in corrosion science and engineering have been published in CORROSION. The journal publishes seven article types – original articles, invited critical reviews, technical notes, corrosion communications fast-tracked for rapid publication, special research topic issues, research letters of yearly annual conference student poster sessions, and scientific investigations of field corrosion processes. CORROSION, the Journal of Science and Engineering, serves as an important communication platform for academics, researchers, technical libraries, and universities. Articles considered for CORROSION should have significant permanent value and should accomplish at least one of the following objectives: • Contribute awareness of corrosion phenomena, • Advance understanding of fundamental process, and/or • Further the knowledge of techniques and practices used to reduce corrosion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信