{"title":"Different functions of ‘rā’ in New Persian","authors":"Mohammad Rasekh-Mahand, Mehdi Parizadeh","doi":"10.1075/jhl.21056.ras","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Persian has a polyfunctional case marker, ‘rā’, which diachronically varies greatly in the range\n of functions it covers. In this paper, we give an account of different case functions of ‘rā’, in New Persian, an\n era from the 8th century (C.E.) to present. To analyze the functionality of ‘rā’ in different texts, we selected\n 78 books from the New and Contemporary Persian eras and studied one thousand tokens of ‘rā’ from each century.\n The data show that ‘rā’ has been a polyfunctional case marker in New Persian, marking about 13 different case\n roles. Its main role was to mark direct objects, and gradually it has become its sole function in Contemporary Persian. However,\n during the time span, some of the ‘rā’-marked roles remained constant and some of them replaced\n ‘rā’ with other adpositions. We follow a historical semantic map approach as a typological grid to examine\n our data. The findings show that ‘rā’ has shifted from animate to inanimate concepts gradually. While in the 12th\n century about 750 out of 1000 (about 75%) roles marked with ‘rā’ were animate, it has decreased to about 400 out\n of 1000 (about 42%) in the 19th century and less than 30% in the 20th century. Our data show that ‘rā’ has not\n gone further to mark inanimate relations, and it has gone toward core case roles, specifically direct object.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21056.ras","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Persian has a polyfunctional case marker, ‘rā’, which diachronically varies greatly in the range
of functions it covers. In this paper, we give an account of different case functions of ‘rā’, in New Persian, an
era from the 8th century (C.E.) to present. To analyze the functionality of ‘rā’ in different texts, we selected
78 books from the New and Contemporary Persian eras and studied one thousand tokens of ‘rā’ from each century.
The data show that ‘rā’ has been a polyfunctional case marker in New Persian, marking about 13 different case
roles. Its main role was to mark direct objects, and gradually it has become its sole function in Contemporary Persian. However,
during the time span, some of the ‘rā’-marked roles remained constant and some of them replaced
‘rā’ with other adpositions. We follow a historical semantic map approach as a typological grid to examine
our data. The findings show that ‘rā’ has shifted from animate to inanimate concepts gradually. While in the 12th
century about 750 out of 1000 (about 75%) roles marked with ‘rā’ were animate, it has decreased to about 400 out
of 1000 (about 42%) in the 19th century and less than 30% in the 20th century. Our data show that ‘rā’ has not
gone further to mark inanimate relations, and it has gone toward core case roles, specifically direct object.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.