THE LEGAL PROOF OF MACAU SCAM IN MALAYSIA

Nurbazla Ismail, Zulfakar Ramlee, Afridah Abas
{"title":"THE LEGAL PROOF OF MACAU SCAM IN MALAYSIA","authors":"Nurbazla Ismail, Zulfakar Ramlee, Afridah Abas","doi":"10.33102/mjsl.vol10no1.307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although there are 5218 Macau scam cases reported since January to October 2020, from the total of the cases, 1420 cases were charged and 2676 were arrested by the Royal Malaysian Police (RMP). This fact can be considered as strong evidence to proof that Macau scam is getting increasingly serious and has the potential to become even worse in the future. Therefore, this study is conducted to investigate the legal meaning of Macau scam, the relevant provision in Malaysian Statute, the methods of proving and the standard of proof applicable in convicting Macau scam crime. Empirical methods of investigation based on available reported cases about Macau scam or fraud are developed herein. Application of such methods will analyse each of the issues highlighted in this study. This study found that Macau's scam means that the fraudulent act deliberately cheats someone to get fast money by making them suffer a loss of money. Besides that, there are provisions that may be applicable to Macau scam; as one of the forms of fraud contained in the Penal Code (Act 574), Section 24, Section 25, Section 415, Section 170 and Section 420. Reviewing cases of fraud as the basis for the Macau scam, it was explicitly stated in most cases that the burden of proof rests with the prosecutor or the group who wished to allege the Macau scam. The standard of proof in civil trials is in the balance of probabilities. The impact of the study is on phone users; victims of Macau scams and legal practitioners in Malaysia. Future studies may be conducted in the field of legal remedies for a Macau scam crime.","PeriodicalId":34345,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol10no1.307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although there are 5218 Macau scam cases reported since January to October 2020, from the total of the cases, 1420 cases were charged and 2676 were arrested by the Royal Malaysian Police (RMP). This fact can be considered as strong evidence to proof that Macau scam is getting increasingly serious and has the potential to become even worse in the future. Therefore, this study is conducted to investigate the legal meaning of Macau scam, the relevant provision in Malaysian Statute, the methods of proving and the standard of proof applicable in convicting Macau scam crime. Empirical methods of investigation based on available reported cases about Macau scam or fraud are developed herein. Application of such methods will analyse each of the issues highlighted in this study. This study found that Macau's scam means that the fraudulent act deliberately cheats someone to get fast money by making them suffer a loss of money. Besides that, there are provisions that may be applicable to Macau scam; as one of the forms of fraud contained in the Penal Code (Act 574), Section 24, Section 25, Section 415, Section 170 and Section 420. Reviewing cases of fraud as the basis for the Macau scam, it was explicitly stated in most cases that the burden of proof rests with the prosecutor or the group who wished to allege the Macau scam. The standard of proof in civil trials is in the balance of probabilities. The impact of the study is on phone users; victims of Macau scams and legal practitioners in Malaysia. Future studies may be conducted in the field of legal remedies for a Macau scam crime.
澳门骗局在马来西亚的法律证明
虽然自2020年1月至10月,澳门共报告了5218起诈骗案件,但在案件总数中,有1420起案件被起诉,2676起案件被马来西亚皇家警察(RMP)逮捕。这一事实可以被认为是强有力的证据,证明澳门骗局越来越严重,并有可能在未来变得更糟。因此,本研究对澳门骗局的法律含义、马来西亚法令的相关规定、澳门骗局罪定罪适用的举证方法和举证标准进行了探讨。本文根据澳门诈骗或欺诈的现有报告案例,开发了实证调查方法。这些方法的应用将分析本研究中强调的每个问题。这项研究发现,澳门的骗局是指欺诈行为故意欺骗某人,使他们遭受损失,以获得快钱。除此之外,还有一些条款可能适用于澳门骗局;作为刑事法典第574条、第24条、第25条、第415条、第170条和第420条规定的欺诈形式之一。在检讨作为澳门骗局基础的诈骗案件时,在大多数案件中都明确指出,举证责任由检控官或希望指控澳门骗局的团体承担。民事审判的证明标准在于权衡各种可能性。这项研究的影响对象是手机用户;澳门诈骗受害者及马来西亚法律从业人员。未来的研究可以在澳门诈骗犯罪的法律救济领域进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信