How accessibility and transportation options affect neighborhood livability: evidence from the 2017 oregon livability survey

IF 2 Q3 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING

Planning Practice and Research Pub Date : 2022-01-25 DOI:10.1080/02697459.2021.2024968

Yizhao Yang, Rebecca Lewis, R. Parker

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Promoting accessibility and expanding transportation options are at the center of many livability programs. Using the 2017 Oregon Livability Survey administered in three regions in Oregon, this paper studies the livability impacts of accessibility and transportation options in the broader context of residential preferences and choices. Findings show that residents valued accessibility and transportation options in both livability conceptualization and their residential choice process within a similar a hierarchy of preferences. Expanding accessibility and transportation options can enhance livability, but its effectiveness is limited if other situational factors critical to residents’ residential choice are not adequately addressed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

可达性和交通选择如何影响社区宜居性:来自2017年俄勒冈州宜居性调查的证据

促进可达性和扩大交通选择是许多宜居性项目的核心。本文利用2017年俄勒冈州三个地区的宜居性调查，在更广泛的居住偏好和选择背景下，研究了可达性和交通选择对宜居性的影响。研究结果表明，居民在宜居性概念化和他们的居住选择过程中都重视可达性和交通选择。扩大可达性和交通选择可以提高宜居性，但如果对居民居住选择至关重要的其他环境因素没有得到充分解决，其有效性是有限的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Planning Practice and Research REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

18.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Over the last decade, Planning Practice & Research (PPR) has established itself as the source for information on current research in planning practice. It is intended for reflective, critical academics, professionals and students who are concerned to keep abreast of and challenge current thinking. PPR is committed to: •bridging the gaps between planning research, practice and education, and between different planning systems •providing a forum for an international readership to discuss and review research on planning practice