Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy using gemcitabine plus S-1 after surgical resection for advanced biliary cancer.

K. Fukushima, H. Motoyama, A. Shimizu, T. Notake, T. Ikehara, H. Hayashi, K. Yasukawa, A. Kobayashi, Y. Soejima
{"title":"Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy using gemcitabine plus S-1 after surgical resection for advanced biliary cancer.","authors":"K. Fukushima, H. Motoyama, A. Shimizu, T. Notake, T. Ikehara, H. Hayashi, K. Yasukawa, A. Kobayashi, Y. Soejima","doi":"10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"132 Background: The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced biliary cancer remains controversial. We previously failed to show survival benefit of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy (UMIN000014018). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy after surgical resection for advanced biliary cancer. Methods: Between January 2006 and May 2019, a total of 110 patients who underwent surgical resection for biliary cancer (UICC Stage II or more) were enrolled in this study. Of these, 33 patients subsequently received 12 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (GS group), and 77 patients underwent surgery alone (S group). A cycle of chemotherapy consisted of oral S-1 70mg/m2 for 7 consecutive days and intravenous gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 on day 7, followed by a 1-week break from chemotherapy. Clinicopathological factors and patient survival were compared between the two groups. Results: GS group had significantly younger patients ( P = 0.036) and higher UICC T factor ( P = 0.001). Surgical procedure was significantly different in the two groups (P = 0.010). Other patient demographics and tumor characteristics were similar between the two groups. The completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy was 57.6%, and there was no treatment-related deaths. All grades and grade 3/4 adverse event were seen in 60.6% and 33.3%, respectively. Three-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were significantly higher in GS group than S group (61.9% vs. 34.4%, P = 0.016; 77.6% vs. 39.7%, P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy using gemcitabine plus S-1 was well tolerated and it would be an effective treatment strategy for the patients with resected advanced biliary cancer. Based on these results, randomized controlled study should be warranted.","PeriodicalId":15862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

132 Background: The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced biliary cancer remains controversial. We previously failed to show survival benefit of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy (UMIN000014018). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy after surgical resection for advanced biliary cancer. Methods: Between January 2006 and May 2019, a total of 110 patients who underwent surgical resection for biliary cancer (UICC Stage II or more) were enrolled in this study. Of these, 33 patients subsequently received 12 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (GS group), and 77 patients underwent surgery alone (S group). A cycle of chemotherapy consisted of oral S-1 70mg/m2 for 7 consecutive days and intravenous gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 on day 7, followed by a 1-week break from chemotherapy. Clinicopathological factors and patient survival were compared between the two groups. Results: GS group had significantly younger patients ( P = 0.036) and higher UICC T factor ( P = 0.001). Surgical procedure was significantly different in the two groups (P = 0.010). Other patient demographics and tumor characteristics were similar between the two groups. The completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy was 57.6%, and there was no treatment-related deaths. All grades and grade 3/4 adverse event were seen in 60.6% and 33.3%, respectively. Three-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were significantly higher in GS group than S group (61.9% vs. 34.4%, P = 0.016; 77.6% vs. 39.7%, P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy using gemcitabine plus S-1 was well tolerated and it would be an effective treatment strategy for the patients with resected advanced biliary cancer. Based on these results, randomized controlled study should be warranted.
吉西他滨加S-1对晚期胆道癌手术切除后辅助化疗的影响。
背景:辅助化疗对晚期胆道癌的影响仍有争议。我们之前未能显示辅助吉西他滨化疗(UMIN000014018)的生存获益。本研究的目的是评价晚期胆道癌手术切除后辅助吉西他滨加S-1化疗的安全性和有效性。方法:在2006年1月至2019年5月期间,共有110例胆道癌(UICC II期或以上)手术切除患者纳入本研究。其中,33例患者随后接受了12个周期的辅助化疗(GS组),77例患者单独接受手术(S组)。化疗周期为连续7天口服S-1 70mg/m2,第7天静脉注射吉西他滨1000mg/m2,休息1周。比较两组患者的临床病理因素及生存率。结果:GS组患者明显年轻化(P = 0.036), UICC T因子明显增高(P = 0.001)。两组手术方式差异有统计学意义(P = 0.010)。两组患者的其他人口统计学特征和肿瘤特征相似。辅助化疗完成率为57.6%,无治疗相关死亡。所有等级和3/4级不良事件发生率分别为60.6%和33.3%。GS组3年无复发生存率和总生存率显著高于S组(61.9% vs. 34.4%, P = 0.016;77.6% vs. 39.7%, P < 0.001)。结论:吉西他滨联合S-1辅助化疗耐受性良好,是晚期胆道癌切除患者的有效治疗策略。基于这些结果,应该进行随机对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Oncology (JGO) is an online only, open access journal focused on cancer care, research and care delivery issues unique to countries and settings with limited healthcare resources. JGO aims to provide a home for high-quality literature that fulfills a growing need for content describing the array of challenges health care professionals in resource-constrained settings face. Article types include original reports, review articles, commentaries, correspondence/replies, special articles and editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信