Predictors of poor seroconversion and adverse events to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in cancer patients on active treatment. Role of the Research Nurse.

Q3 Medicine
Tania Buttiron Webber, N. Provinciali, I. M. Briata, M. Boitano, C. Defferrari, Monica Magnani, Fortuna Paciolla, Emanuela Mercenaro, I. Cevasco, S. Gandini, A. Decensi
{"title":"Predictors of poor seroconversion and adverse events to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in cancer patients on active treatment. Role of the Research Nurse.","authors":"Tania Buttiron Webber, N. Provinciali, I. M. Briata, M. Boitano, C. Defferrari, Monica Magnani, Fortuna Paciolla, Emanuela Mercenaro, I. Cevasco, S. Gandini, A. Decensi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3901796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nVaccines have shown 95% protection from COVID-19 disease in healthy populations. Initial findings in cancer patients suggest a lower seroconversion and greater toxicity possibly related to myelo-immunosuppressive therapies.\n\n\nAIM\nWe conducted a prospective study to assess factors predicting poor seroconversion and adverse events following immunization (AEFI) to the BNT162b2 vaccine in cancer patients on active treatment.\n\n\nMETHODS\nBlood samples were collected by the research nurse at first dose (visit 1), second dose (visit 2), after 42 days (visit 3) and after 6 months (visit 4). At visit 1, 3 and 4 participants received: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Distress Thermometer. Patients who ended treatment >6 months on active surveillance served as controls.\n\n\nRESULTS\nBetween March and July 2021, 320 subjects were recruited and 291 were assessable. The lack of seroconversion at 21 days from the second dose was 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4-8.7) on active surveillance, 13.9% (8.2-21.6) on chemotherapy, 11.4% (5.1-21.3) on hormone therapy, 21.7% (7.5-43.7) on targeted therapy and 4.8% (0.12-23.8) on immunotherapy. Compared to controls, the risk of no IgG response was greater for chemotherapy (P=0.033), targeted therapy (0.005) and hormonotherapy (P=0.051). Lymphocyte count less than 1x109/L, older age and advanced stage also significantly predicted poor seroconversion. Overall, 43 patients (14.8%) complained of AEFI, mostly of mild grade. Risk of AEFI was greater in females (P=0.001) and younger patients (P=0.009).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nA third booster dose and long-term serological testing is required in subjects who have not responded to the vaccine.\n\n\nNURSING IMPLICATIONS\nnurses must take responsibility for promoting and protecting the health of cancer patients.","PeriodicalId":34911,"journal":{"name":"Professioni infermieristiche","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professioni infermieristiche","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3901796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND Vaccines have shown 95% protection from COVID-19 disease in healthy populations. Initial findings in cancer patients suggest a lower seroconversion and greater toxicity possibly related to myelo-immunosuppressive therapies. AIM We conducted a prospective study to assess factors predicting poor seroconversion and adverse events following immunization (AEFI) to the BNT162b2 vaccine in cancer patients on active treatment. METHODS Blood samples were collected by the research nurse at first dose (visit 1), second dose (visit 2), after 42 days (visit 3) and after 6 months (visit 4). At visit 1, 3 and 4 participants received: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Distress Thermometer. Patients who ended treatment >6 months on active surveillance served as controls. RESULTS Between March and July 2021, 320 subjects were recruited and 291 were assessable. The lack of seroconversion at 21 days from the second dose was 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4-8.7) on active surveillance, 13.9% (8.2-21.6) on chemotherapy, 11.4% (5.1-21.3) on hormone therapy, 21.7% (7.5-43.7) on targeted therapy and 4.8% (0.12-23.8) on immunotherapy. Compared to controls, the risk of no IgG response was greater for chemotherapy (P=0.033), targeted therapy (0.005) and hormonotherapy (P=0.051). Lymphocyte count less than 1x109/L, older age and advanced stage also significantly predicted poor seroconversion. Overall, 43 patients (14.8%) complained of AEFI, mostly of mild grade. Risk of AEFI was greater in females (P=0.001) and younger patients (P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS A third booster dose and long-term serological testing is required in subjects who have not responded to the vaccine. NURSING IMPLICATIONS nurses must take responsibility for promoting and protecting the health of cancer patients.
积极治疗的癌症患者对SARS-CoV-2 mRNA BNT162b2疫苗的不良血清转化率和不良事件的预测因素。研究护士的角色。
背景疫苗在健康人群中对新冠肺炎疾病的保护率为95%。癌症患者的初步发现表明,血清转化率较低,毒性较大,可能与骨髓免疫抑制疗法有关。目的我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,以评估积极治疗的癌症患者接种BNT162b2疫苗后血清转化率低和不良事件的预测因素。方法研究护士在第一剂(访视1)、第二剂(访问2)、42天后(访视3)和6个月后(访视4)采集血液样本。在访视1、3和4时,参与者接受了医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)和痛苦温度计。主动监测结束治疗>6个月的患者作为对照。结果在2021年3月至7月期间,共招募了320名受试者,291人可进行评估。在第二次给药后21天,主动监测的血清转化率为1.6%(95%CI,0.4-8.7),化疗为13.9%(8.2-21.6),激素治疗为11.4%(5.1-21.3),靶向治疗为21.7%(7.5-43.7),免疫治疗为4.8%(0.12-23.8)。与对照组相比,化疗(P=0.033)、靶向治疗(0.005)和激素治疗(P=0.051)无IgG反应的风险更大。淋巴细胞计数低于1x109/L、年龄较大和晚期也可显著预测血清转化率低。总的来说,43名患者(14.8%)抱怨AEFI,大多数是轻度。女性(P=0.001)和年轻患者(P=0.009)发生AEFI的风险更大。结论对疫苗没有反应的受试者需要进行第三次加强针和长期血清学检测。护理实施Snurses必须负责促进和保护癌症患者的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Professioni infermieristiche
Professioni infermieristiche Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Professioni Infermieristiche pubblica, previa approvazione del Comitato di Redazione (CdR), articoli relativi alle diverse funzioni ed ambiti della professione infermieristica e ostetrica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信