Thermal Microcautery, a Form of Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Treatment of Painful Knee Osteoarthritis: Non-Randomized Controlled Trial

C. Power, D. Galvin, T. Foto, A. Mahmoud, N. Kostopoulos
{"title":"Thermal Microcautery, a Form of Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Treatment of Painful Knee Osteoarthritis: Non-Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"C. Power, D. Galvin, T. Foto, A. Mahmoud, N. Kostopoulos","doi":"10.4236/pst.2019.73003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Thermal Microcautery (TMC) is a form of peripheral nerve field stimulation and is a technique used in Traditional Indian Medicine (Agnikarma) to manage chronic pain. The aim was to asses TMC in painful knee osteoarthritis (PKO). Methods: A non-randomized controlled trial was employed. All PKO patients on a waiting list for knee replacement were offered PNFS-TMC. Patients in the intervention group received 4 sessions (2 weeks apart) of PNFS-TMC by a pin-point tip of a metal rod. The rod was heated over a flame for 5 minutes before being used to induce a single 1 mm second-degree burn over points of tenderness. The control group was selected from the same waiting list. The primary outcome was assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores. The secondary outcomes were changes in levels of physical day to day activity, sleep and analgesics. Results: 16 PNFS-TMC intervention group patients and 15 control group patients were subject to analysis. Baseline VAS score was higher in PNFS-TMC group [9 ± 1.23 (95% CI 8.38 - 9.61) versus 5.93 ± 2.11 (95% CI 4.81 - 7.06) in the control, P < 0.0001]. VAS scores after 8 weeks (i.e. 4 sessions) were lower in the PNFS-TMC group [4.64 ± 2.08 (95% CI 3.57 - 5.72) versus 6.73 ± 2.01 (95% CI 5.61 - 7.85) respectively with P = 0.0058]. In the PNFS-TMC group, VAS score decreased from 9 ± 1.23 (95% CI 8.38 - 9.61) at baseline to 4.64 ± 2.08 (95% CI 3.57 - 5.72) after 4 sessions (P < 0.0001). In control group, VAS score showed a non-significant increase in VAS score from 5.93 ± 2.11 (95% CI 4.81 - 7.06) to 6.73 ± 2.01 (95% CI 5.61 - 7.85) (P = 0.2844). Results indicate reduction of pain VAS scores in the PNFS-TMC group (P < 0.0001). Eleven patients (68.7%) experienced increased capacity to perform daily physical activities P < 0.0001 and 5 (31.2%) showed no change in activity P < 0.0418. 5 (33.3%) of the patients in the control group became worse and 10 (66.7%) experienced no change. Conclusions: PNFS-TMC could offer a simple, safe, cheap and effective method of pain management in chronic PKO patients.","PeriodicalId":69134,"journal":{"name":"疼痛研究与治疗(英文)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"疼痛研究与治疗(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/pst.2019.73003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Thermal Microcautery (TMC) is a form of peripheral nerve field stimulation and is a technique used in Traditional Indian Medicine (Agnikarma) to manage chronic pain. The aim was to asses TMC in painful knee osteoarthritis (PKO). Methods: A non-randomized controlled trial was employed. All PKO patients on a waiting list for knee replacement were offered PNFS-TMC. Patients in the intervention group received 4 sessions (2 weeks apart) of PNFS-TMC by a pin-point tip of a metal rod. The rod was heated over a flame for 5 minutes before being used to induce a single 1 mm second-degree burn over points of tenderness. The control group was selected from the same waiting list. The primary outcome was assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores. The secondary outcomes were changes in levels of physical day to day activity, sleep and analgesics. Results: 16 PNFS-TMC intervention group patients and 15 control group patients were subject to analysis. Baseline VAS score was higher in PNFS-TMC group [9 ± 1.23 (95% CI 8.38 - 9.61) versus 5.93 ± 2.11 (95% CI 4.81 - 7.06) in the control, P < 0.0001]. VAS scores after 8 weeks (i.e. 4 sessions) were lower in the PNFS-TMC group [4.64 ± 2.08 (95% CI 3.57 - 5.72) versus 6.73 ± 2.01 (95% CI 5.61 - 7.85) respectively with P = 0.0058]. In the PNFS-TMC group, VAS score decreased from 9 ± 1.23 (95% CI 8.38 - 9.61) at baseline to 4.64 ± 2.08 (95% CI 3.57 - 5.72) after 4 sessions (P < 0.0001). In control group, VAS score showed a non-significant increase in VAS score from 5.93 ± 2.11 (95% CI 4.81 - 7.06) to 6.73 ± 2.01 (95% CI 5.61 - 7.85) (P = 0.2844). Results indicate reduction of pain VAS scores in the PNFS-TMC group (P < 0.0001). Eleven patients (68.7%) experienced increased capacity to perform daily physical activities P < 0.0001 and 5 (31.2%) showed no change in activity P < 0.0418. 5 (33.3%) of the patients in the control group became worse and 10 (66.7%) experienced no change. Conclusions: PNFS-TMC could offer a simple, safe, cheap and effective method of pain management in chronic PKO patients.
热微灼,一种外周神经场刺激治疗疼痛性膝骨关节炎:非随机对照试验
背景:热微创(TMC)是外周神经场刺激的一种形式,是印度传统医学(Agnikarma)中用于治疗慢性疼痛的一种技术。目的是评估TMC在疼痛性膝关节骨性关节炎(PKO)中的作用。方法:采用非随机对照试验。所有膝关节置换术等待名单上的PKO患者都接受了PNFS-TMC治疗。干预组的患者通过金属棒的针尖接受4次PNFS-TMC治疗(间隔2周)。将棒在火焰上加热5分钟,然后用于在压痛点上引起单个1mm的二度烧伤。对照组是从同一等待名单中选择的。主要结果通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分进行评估。次要结果是日常体力活动、睡眠和镇痛药水平的变化。结果:对16例PNFS-TMC干预组患者和15例对照组患者进行分析。PNFS-TMC组的基线VAS评分较高[9±1.23(95%CI 8.38-9.61),对照组为5.93±2.11(95%CI 4.81-7.06),P<0.0001]。8周后(即4个疗程)的VAS评分较低【分别为4.64±2.08(95%CI 3.57-5.72)和6.73±2.01(95%CI 5.61-7.85),P=0.0058],VAS评分从基线时的9±1.23(95%CI 8.38-9.61)降至4个疗程后的4.64±2.08(95%CI 3.57-5.72)(P<0.0001),VAS评分显示VAS评分从5.93±2.11(95%CI 4.81-7.06)增加到6.73±2.01(95%CI 5.61-7.85),无显著性差异(P=0.2844)。结果表明PNFS-TMC组疼痛VAS评分降低(P<0.0001)。11名患者(68.7%)的日常体育活动能力增加,P<0.0001,5名患者(31.2%)的活动能力无变化,P=0.0418。对照组5例(33.3%)病情加重,10例(66.7%)无变化。结论:PNFS-TMC可为慢性PKO患者提供一种简单、安全、廉价、有效的疼痛管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信