Nature-based solutions for water management: insights to assess the contribution to urban resilience

IF 2.3 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
P. Beceiro, R. Brito, A. Galvão
{"title":"Nature-based solutions for water management: insights to assess the contribution to urban resilience","authors":"P. Beceiro, R. Brito, A. Galvão","doi":"10.2166/bgs.2022.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Assessing the Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) contribution to urban resilience, along with developing tools capable of demonstrating their long-term value, comprises a most needed step forward. Nevertheless, the NBS contribution to urban resilience has been yet slightly explored. Given the urban resilience complexity and multiple NBS capabilities, specific needs for a robust assessment should be investigated. This paper identifies the requirements for a comprehensive assessment of the NBS contribution to urban resilience and analyses the main assessment frameworks focused on resilience and NBS for urban drainage. First, the evolution of the resilience concept and relevant resilience assessment frameworks (RAF) are presented. Secondly, NBS challenges to enhance resilience and NBS assessment proposals are analysed. Thirdly, the attributes for assessing urban resilience and aspects to assess the NBS contribution are analysed. To conclude, a critical analysis of the assessment approaches is presented. Important challenges across the RAF have been identified, especially regarding their feasibility of application. Based on the performed analysis, most RAFs are not feasible for city benchmarking and assessing the resilience evolution over time, neither for assessing comprehensively the NBS contribution. Regarding specifically the NBS assessment proposals, just one focused on urban resilience was developed to date, which allows evaluating their contribution over time, between cities, or between different NBS.","PeriodicalId":9337,"journal":{"name":"Blue-Green Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blue-Green Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/bgs.2022.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Assessing the Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) contribution to urban resilience, along with developing tools capable of demonstrating their long-term value, comprises a most needed step forward. Nevertheless, the NBS contribution to urban resilience has been yet slightly explored. Given the urban resilience complexity and multiple NBS capabilities, specific needs for a robust assessment should be investigated. This paper identifies the requirements for a comprehensive assessment of the NBS contribution to urban resilience and analyses the main assessment frameworks focused on resilience and NBS for urban drainage. First, the evolution of the resilience concept and relevant resilience assessment frameworks (RAF) are presented. Secondly, NBS challenges to enhance resilience and NBS assessment proposals are analysed. Thirdly, the attributes for assessing urban resilience and aspects to assess the NBS contribution are analysed. To conclude, a critical analysis of the assessment approaches is presented. Important challenges across the RAF have been identified, especially regarding their feasibility of application. Based on the performed analysis, most RAFs are not feasible for city benchmarking and assessing the resilience evolution over time, neither for assessing comprehensively the NBS contribution. Regarding specifically the NBS assessment proposals, just one focused on urban resilience was developed to date, which allows evaluating their contribution over time, between cities, or between different NBS.
基于自然的水资源管理解决方案:评估对城市恢复力贡献的见解
评估基于自然的解决方案(NBS)对城市韧性的贡献,以及开发能够证明其长期价值的工具,是最需要的一步。尽管如此,国家统计局对城市恢复力的贡献尚未得到初步探讨。鉴于城市复原力的复杂性和国家统计局的多种能力,应调查稳健评估的具体需求。本文确定了对国家统计局对城市恢复力的贡献进行综合评估的要求,并分析了主要的评估框架,重点是城市排水的恢复力和国家统计局。首先,介绍了复原力概念的演变和相关的复原力评估框架。其次,分析了国家统计局在增强复原力方面面临的挑战以及国家统计局的评估建议。第三,分析了评估城市恢复力的属性和评估国家统计局贡献的方面。最后,对评估方法进行了批判性分析。英国皇家空军面临的重要挑战已经确定,尤其是在应用的可行性方面。根据所进行的分析,大多数英国皇家空军不适用于城市基准和评估一段时间内的恢复力演变,也不适用于全面评估国家统计局的贡献。具体来说,关于国家统计局的评估提案,迄今为止只制定了一个侧重于城市恢复力的提案,该提案允许评估其在一段时间内、城市之间或不同国家统计局之间的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blue-Green Systems
Blue-Green Systems Multiple-
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信