‘The law has taken all my rights away’: on India’s conundrum of able-normative death with dignity

Q3 Social Sciences
K. Kalra
{"title":"‘The law has taken all my rights away’: on India’s conundrum of able-normative death with dignity","authors":"K. Kalra","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2023.2234749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article argues that the exceptionless prohibition on active euthanasia contained in Indian penal law constitutes indirect discrimination against terminally ill persons disabled from committing suicide, and that reasonable accommodation by way of permitting assisted suicide for persons falling within this class is necessary to address such discrimination. While terminally ill persons physically capable of committing suicide may do so without the threat of penal sanction due to the general decriminalisation of the attempt to commit suicide under the Mental Healthcare Act 2017, those who are physically disabled and require assistance are forbidden therefrom due to the exceptionless prohibition under the Indian Penal Code. I argue, therefore, that the current law constitutes both indirect discrimination and a denial of reasonable accommodation, and is incompatible with the constitutional pursuit of substantive equality. I also argue that this incompatibility cannot be saved by a proportionality-backed justification.","PeriodicalId":35148,"journal":{"name":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2023.2234749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article argues that the exceptionless prohibition on active euthanasia contained in Indian penal law constitutes indirect discrimination against terminally ill persons disabled from committing suicide, and that reasonable accommodation by way of permitting assisted suicide for persons falling within this class is necessary to address such discrimination. While terminally ill persons physically capable of committing suicide may do so without the threat of penal sanction due to the general decriminalisation of the attempt to commit suicide under the Mental Healthcare Act 2017, those who are physically disabled and require assistance are forbidden therefrom due to the exceptionless prohibition under the Indian Penal Code. I argue, therefore, that the current law constitutes both indirect discrimination and a denial of reasonable accommodation, and is incompatible with the constitutional pursuit of substantive equality. I also argue that this incompatibility cannot be saved by a proportionality-backed justification.
“法律剥夺了我所有的权利”:关于印度的有尊严的正常死亡难题
摘要本文认为,印度刑法中对主动安乐死的无例外禁令构成了对绝症残疾人自杀的间接歧视,有必要通过允许这一类人协助自杀的方式提供合理的便利,以解决这种歧视。虽然根据2017年《精神卫生保健法》,身体上有能力自杀的绝症患者可以在没有刑事制裁威胁的情况下自杀,但由于《印度刑法典》的无例外禁令,那些身体残疾并需要帮助的人被禁止自杀。因此,我认为,现行法律既构成间接歧视,也构成拒绝合理通融,不符合宪法对实质平等的追求。我还认为,这种不相容性不能通过比例支持的理由来挽救。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信