Results of using Luer-Lok access device for clinics, intensive care units, and emergency services with high pre-analytical errors: analysis of 491.850 samples
E. Menekşe, M. E. Duz, B. Avci, Alpaslan Ozturk, Mustafa Durmaz
{"title":"Results of using Luer-Lok access device for clinics, intensive care units, and emergency services with high pre-analytical errors: analysis of 491.850 samples","authors":"E. Menekşe, M. E. Duz, B. Avci, Alpaslan Ozturk, Mustafa Durmaz","doi":"10.1515/labmed-2021-0176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives The effectiveness of the Luer-Lok™ Access Device (LL) with the intravenous catheter (IVC) on sample rejections, which is used to prevent primarily hemolysis in the emergency department (ED), clinics, and intensive care units (ICU), was examined. Methods A total of 491.850 samples of eight months from Amasya University Sabuncuoğlu Şerefeddin Training and Research Hospital were investigated retrospectively. Inpatient, intensive care unit and emergency department samples were included in the study. Pre- (BLL) and post-Luer Lok (ALL) rejection of the samples analyzed. In the BLL period, 3,463 rejection samples out of 253,818 (1.36%) in the September-December period of 2020; in the ALL period, 1819 rejected samples from 238,032 (0.76%) in January-April 2021 were analyzed for all reasons. Results It was determined that the use of LL significantly reduced all-cause sample rejections. In addition, a significant decrease was observed in the rates of hemolysis and clot-related rejection thanks to LL. Conclusions According to our study data, in patients with IVC with the LL device, the pressure brought by the syringe is mainly avoided, and reliable blood collection is achieved, similar to the routine vacutainer blood collection apparatus, and hemolysis- and clot-related sample rejections are largely prevented.","PeriodicalId":55986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"46 1","pages":"399 - 403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2021-0176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Objectives The effectiveness of the Luer-Lok™ Access Device (LL) with the intravenous catheter (IVC) on sample rejections, which is used to prevent primarily hemolysis in the emergency department (ED), clinics, and intensive care units (ICU), was examined. Methods A total of 491.850 samples of eight months from Amasya University Sabuncuoğlu Şerefeddin Training and Research Hospital were investigated retrospectively. Inpatient, intensive care unit and emergency department samples were included in the study. Pre- (BLL) and post-Luer Lok (ALL) rejection of the samples analyzed. In the BLL period, 3,463 rejection samples out of 253,818 (1.36%) in the September-December period of 2020; in the ALL period, 1819 rejected samples from 238,032 (0.76%) in January-April 2021 were analyzed for all reasons. Results It was determined that the use of LL significantly reduced all-cause sample rejections. In addition, a significant decrease was observed in the rates of hemolysis and clot-related rejection thanks to LL. Conclusions According to our study data, in patients with IVC with the LL device, the pressure brought by the syringe is mainly avoided, and reliable blood collection is achieved, similar to the routine vacutainer blood collection apparatus, and hemolysis- and clot-related sample rejections are largely prevented.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Laboratory Medicine (JLM) is a bi-monthly published journal that reports on the latest developments in laboratory medicine. Particular focus is placed on the diagnostic aspects of the clinical laboratory, although technical, regulatory, and educational topics are equally covered. The Journal specializes in the publication of high-standard, competent and timely review articles on clinical, methodological and pathogenic aspects of modern laboratory diagnostics. These reviews are critically reviewed by expert reviewers and JLM’s Associate Editors who are specialists in the various subdisciplines of laboratory medicine. In addition, JLM publishes original research articles, case reports, point/counterpoint articles and letters to the editor, all of which are peer reviewed by at least two experts in the field.