What is the Optimal Construct to Reduce Failure in Arthroscopic Four Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair?

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Shoulder and Elbow Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1177/17585732221076066
Andrea H Johnson, Michaline West, M Brook Fowler, Benjamin M Petre, Justin J Turcotte, Daniel E Redziniak
{"title":"What is the Optimal Construct to Reduce Failure in Arthroscopic Four Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair?","authors":"Andrea H Johnson, Michaline West, M Brook Fowler, Benjamin M Petre, Justin J Turcotte, Daniel E Redziniak","doi":"10.1177/17585732221076066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Re-tear following rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a concerning complication that can lead to poor patient outcomes and necessitate the need for revision surgery. The purpose of our study was to look at the combined construct of knotted vs. knotless medial row and suture vs. suture tape, focusing primarily on re-tear rates following surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study of 343 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic double row, 4-anchor rotator cuff repair from February 2014 to March 2020 was conducted. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to assess differences in demographics, comorbidities and tear characteristics between patients who experienced a symptomatic re-tear and those who did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall symptomatic re-tear rate was 7.6%. Patients who had a knotted medial row repair had a significantly lower rate of re-tear (4.7 vs. 11.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.022). Patients that had a knotted medial row and suture tape repair were significantly less likely to experience a re-tear (OR: 0.180, <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The use of suture tape and a knotted medial row repair decreases the incidence of symptomatic re-tear following rotator cuff repair. The combined construct of suture tape and a knotted medial row in rotator cuff repair decreases the risk for symptomatic re-tear following surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":"1 1","pages":"33-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732221076066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Re-tear following rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a concerning complication that can lead to poor patient outcomes and necessitate the need for revision surgery. The purpose of our study was to look at the combined construct of knotted vs. knotless medial row and suture vs. suture tape, focusing primarily on re-tear rates following surgery.

Methods: A retrospective observational study of 343 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic double row, 4-anchor rotator cuff repair from February 2014 to March 2020 was conducted. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to assess differences in demographics, comorbidities and tear characteristics between patients who experienced a symptomatic re-tear and those who did not.

Results: The overall symptomatic re-tear rate was 7.6%. Patients who had a knotted medial row repair had a significantly lower rate of re-tear (4.7 vs. 11.3%, p = 0.022). Patients that had a knotted medial row and suture tape repair were significantly less likely to experience a re-tear (OR: 0.180, p = 0.001).

Discussion: The use of suture tape and a knotted medial row repair decreases the incidence of symptomatic re-tear following rotator cuff repair. The combined construct of suture tape and a knotted medial row in rotator cuff repair decreases the risk for symptomatic re-tear following surgery.

什么是减少关节镜下四锚式肩袖修复失败的最佳构造?
肩袖修复(RCR)后再撕裂是一个令人担忧的并发症,可导致患者预后不佳,需要翻修手术。我们研究的目的是观察有结与无结的内侧排和缝合与缝合带的组合结构,主要关注手术后的再撕裂率。对2014年2月至2020年3月连续343例接受关节镜双排4锚点肩袖修复术的患者进行回顾性观察研究。使用单变量和多变量统计来评估经历症状性再撕裂的患者和没有经历症状性再撕裂的患者在人口统计学、合并症和撕裂特征方面的差异。总症状性再撕裂率为7.6%。行内侧行打结修复术的患者再撕裂率显著降低(4.7 vs 11.3%, p = 0.022)。内侧行打结并缝合带修复的患者再次撕裂的可能性显著降低(OR: 0.180, p = 0.001)。使用缝合带和内侧行打结修复可减少肩袖修复后症状性再撕裂的发生率。在肩袖修复中,缝合带和内侧行打结的组合结构可降低术后再次出现症状性撕裂的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信