What is the Priestley–Taylor wet-surface evaporation parameter? Testing four hypotheses

IF 5.7 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Crago, Joszef Szilagyi, R. Qualls
{"title":"What is the Priestley–Taylor wet-surface evaporation parameter? Testing four hypotheses","authors":"R. Crago, Joszef Szilagyi, R. Qualls","doi":"10.5194/hess-27-3205-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This study compares four different hypotheses regarding the nature\nof the Priestley–Taylor parameter α. They are as follows:\n α is a universal constant. The Bowen ratio (H/LE, where H is the sensible heat flux, and LE is\nthe latent heat flux) for equilibrium (i.e., saturated air column near the\nsurface) evaporation is a constant times the Bowen ratio at minimal\nadvection (Andreas et al., 2013). Minimal advection over a wet surface corresponds to a particular relative humidity value. α is a constant fraction of the difference from the minimum value of 1 to the maximum value of α proposed by Priestley and Taylor (1972).\nFormulas for α are developed for the last three hypotheses. Weather,\nradiation, and surface energy flux data from 171 FLUXNET eddy covariance\nstations were used. The condition LEref/LEp> 0.90 was\ntaken as the criterion for nearly saturated conditions (where LEref is\nthe reference, and LEp is the apparent potential evaporation rate from the equation by Penman, 1948). Daily and monthly average data from the sites were\nobtained. All formulations for α include one model parameter which\nis optimized such that the root mean square error of the target variable was\nminimized. For each model, separate optimizations were done for predictions\nof the target variables α, wet-surface evaporation (α\nmultiplied by equilibrium evaporation rate) and actual evaporation (the\nlatter using a highly successful version of the complementary relationship\nof evaporation). Overall, the second and fourth hypotheses received the best\nsupport from the data.\n","PeriodicalId":13143,"journal":{"name":"Hydrology and Earth System Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrology and Earth System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3205-2023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. This study compares four different hypotheses regarding the nature of the Priestley–Taylor parameter α. They are as follows: α is a universal constant. The Bowen ratio (H/LE, where H is the sensible heat flux, and LE is the latent heat flux) for equilibrium (i.e., saturated air column near the surface) evaporation is a constant times the Bowen ratio at minimal advection (Andreas et al., 2013). Minimal advection over a wet surface corresponds to a particular relative humidity value. α is a constant fraction of the difference from the minimum value of 1 to the maximum value of α proposed by Priestley and Taylor (1972). Formulas for α are developed for the last three hypotheses. Weather, radiation, and surface energy flux data from 171 FLUXNET eddy covariance stations were used. The condition LEref/LEp> 0.90 was taken as the criterion for nearly saturated conditions (where LEref is the reference, and LEp is the apparent potential evaporation rate from the equation by Penman, 1948). Daily and monthly average data from the sites were obtained. All formulations for α include one model parameter which is optimized such that the root mean square error of the target variable was minimized. For each model, separate optimizations were done for predictions of the target variables α, wet-surface evaporation (α multiplied by equilibrium evaporation rate) and actual evaporation (the latter using a highly successful version of the complementary relationship of evaporation). Overall, the second and fourth hypotheses received the best support from the data.
什么是Priestley-Taylor湿面蒸发参数?检验四个假设
摘要本研究比较了关于Priestley-Taylor参数α性质的四种不同假设。它们是:α是一个普遍常数。平衡(即近地表饱和气柱)蒸发的波文比(H/LE,其中H为感热通量,LE为潜热通量)是最小平流时波文比的常数倍(Andreas et al., 2013)。湿面上的最小平流对应于一个特定的相对湿度值。α是由Priestley和Taylor(1972)提出的从1的最小值到最大值的差的常数分数。为后三个假设推导出了α的公式。使用了来自171个FLUXNET涡动相关变差的天气、辐射和地表能量通量数据。采用leef /LEp> 0.90作为近饱和条件的判据(leef为参考,LEp为Penman, 1948公式中的表观潜在蒸发速率)。从这些地点获得每日和每月的平均数据。α的所有公式都包含一个模型参数,该参数经过优化,使目标变量的均方根误差最小。对于每个模型,分别对目标变量α、湿面蒸发(α乘以平衡蒸发率)和实际蒸发(后者使用了一个非常成功的蒸发互补关系版本)的预测进行了优化。总体而言,第二和第四种假设得到了数据的最佳支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
273
审稿时长
15 months
期刊介绍: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS) is a not-for-profit international two-stage open-access journal for the publication of original research in hydrology. HESS encourages and supports fundamental and applied research that advances the understanding of hydrological systems, their role in providing water for ecosystems and society, and the role of the water cycle in the functioning of the Earth system. A multi-disciplinary approach is encouraged that broadens the hydrological perspective and the advancement of hydrological science through integration with other cognate sciences and cross-fertilization across disciplinary boundaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信