A city and its people: exploring limitations to participation within modern urban space

Q3 Social Sciences

Studies in Political Economy Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/07078552.2021.1949786

Wesley Petite

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Recent scholarship has revealed a “participatory paradox” that highlights how increased support for participatory initiatives continues to be limited by centralized forms of decisionmaking. To explain this paradox, this article uses the analytical framework of Critical Institutionalism (CI) to explain how the professionalization of planning establishes distinct ways of knowing the urban public realm. Despite the presence of new participatory practices, these professionalized ways of knowing continue to trump the experiential knowledge of participants.

查看原文本刊更多论文

城市及其居民:探索参与现代城市空间的限制

摘要最近的学术研究揭示了一个“参与性悖论”，它突出了对参与性倡议的支持是如何继续受到集中决策形式的限制的。为了解释这一悖论，本文使用批判制度主义（CI）的分析框架来解释规划的专业化如何建立了解城市公共领域的独特方式。尽管存在新的参与实践，但这些专业化的认识方式仍然胜过参与者的经验知识。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Studies in Political Economy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Studies in Political Economy is an interdisciplinary journal committed to the publication of original work in the various traditions of socialist political economy. Researchers and analysts within these traditions seek to understand how political, economic and cultural processes and struggles interact to shape and reshape the conditions of people"s lives.