Old wine in new bottles? Regulating employee social media use through termination of employment law: A comparative analysis

A. O'Rourke, A. Pyman, J. Teicher, Bernadine van Gramberg
{"title":"Old wine in new bottles? Regulating employee social media use through termination of employment law: A comparative analysis","authors":"A. O'Rourke, A. Pyman, J. Teicher, Bernadine van Gramberg","doi":"10.1177/1473779518807155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The explosion in social media usage and ease of access to instant communication provided by new technologies presents employers and business with benefits and problems. The literature on new technologies and the workplace is replete with employer unease about employee use of social media. The most prominent of these apprehensions concern what has been described as ‘cyberslacking’ or ‘cyberloafing’, and reductions in concentration and workplace productivity. The most common employer response to these concerns is often to engage in employee surveillance or termination of employment. This article examines the latter response. It explores whether new legal principles are emerging from Courts, Tribunals and Commissions adjudicating social media and email dismissal cases or whether they are merely reframing existing laws to adapt to novel workplace situations. We use a comparative approach to address this question, comparing legal cases in Australia, Britain and America. The purpose of this article is to assess if there are any commonalities emerging between the three jurisdictions, or by contrast, whether the law is being shaped by the unique features of each jurisdiction.","PeriodicalId":87174,"journal":{"name":"Common law world review","volume":"47 1","pages":"248 - 271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473779518807155","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Common law world review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779518807155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The explosion in social media usage and ease of access to instant communication provided by new technologies presents employers and business with benefits and problems. The literature on new technologies and the workplace is replete with employer unease about employee use of social media. The most prominent of these apprehensions concern what has been described as ‘cyberslacking’ or ‘cyberloafing’, and reductions in concentration and workplace productivity. The most common employer response to these concerns is often to engage in employee surveillance or termination of employment. This article examines the latter response. It explores whether new legal principles are emerging from Courts, Tribunals and Commissions adjudicating social media and email dismissal cases or whether they are merely reframing existing laws to adapt to novel workplace situations. We use a comparative approach to address this question, comparing legal cases in Australia, Britain and America. The purpose of this article is to assess if there are any commonalities emerging between the three jurisdictions, or by contrast, whether the law is being shaped by the unique features of each jurisdiction.
新瓶装旧酒?通过终止雇佣法规范员工社交媒体使用:比较分析
社交媒体使用量的激增和新技术提供的即时通信的便捷性给雇主和企业带来了好处和问题。关于新技术和工作场所的文献充满了雇主对员工使用社交媒体的不安。这些担忧中最突出的是所谓的“网络懒散”或“网络游手好闲”,以及注意力和工作效率的下降。雇主对这些担忧最常见的回应往往是对员工进行监督或终止雇佣。本文考察了后一种反应。它探讨了法院、法庭和委员会在审理社交媒体和电子邮件解雇案件时是否出现了新的法律原则,或者它们是否只是在重新制定现有法律以适应新的工作环境。我们采用比较的方法来解决这个问题,比较澳大利亚、英国和美国的法律案例。本条的目的是评估这三个司法管辖区之间是否存在任何共同点,或者相比之下,法律是否由每个司法管辖区的独特特征决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信