Criticisms and perspectives of heuristic learning in physical education

IF 0.7 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
T. D’Isanto, Felice Di Domenico, S. Aliberti, F. D’Elia, G. Raiola
{"title":"Criticisms and perspectives of heuristic learning in physical education","authors":"T. D’Isanto, Felice Di Domenico, S. Aliberti, F. D’Elia, G. Raiola","doi":"10.15561/26649837.2022.0203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and study aim. The ecological-dynamic approach promotes motor learning through task variability, modification of environmental constraints and appropriate use of feedback, original and creative motor solutions. This study wants to open a critical perspective on the didactics of physical activity selecting a methodological perspective adherent to ecological-dynamic approach. The aim is to highlight the significant aspects and the uniqueness and unrepeatability of heuristic learning, starting from theoretical lines. \nMaterial and Methods. For this purpose, an accurate survey of the scientific literature has been analyzed, highlighting the points of contact and contrast of cognitive and ecological-dynamic approach. \nResults. In the context of physical education, the most used pedagogical approach is the linear one. Teaching is influenced by spatial and temporal constraints, spaces and equipment, with reproduction styles and with predefined tasks and motor responses. This modality promotes awareness of motor skills and not transferability to other subject areas, as indicated by ministerial documents. Non-linear pedagogy, while promoting motor learning as a consequence of the interaction between the subject and the context, shows some limits. The first concerns the learning of transversal skills and, the second concerns the use of prescriptive teaching, absent in the ecological-dynamic approach, through heuristic learning. It is necessary to overcome the areas of prescriptiveness that still resist in the paradigm most recognized by the scientific community, the Constraints Led Approach, closely related to nonlinear pedagogy. They do not favor completely a heuristic learning as the anthropometric constraints suffer from the limitation of biomechanics. Also, goal constraints are prescriptively determined by the physical education teacher, which is not compatible with heuristic learning. \nConclusions. This analysis highlights the need, usefulness and usability of heuristic learning in different professional fields. The study aims to offer a new perspective on physical education objectives in the National Indications, projecting them towards a social and transversal purpose.","PeriodicalId":52407,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2022.0203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background and study aim. The ecological-dynamic approach promotes motor learning through task variability, modification of environmental constraints and appropriate use of feedback, original and creative motor solutions. This study wants to open a critical perspective on the didactics of physical activity selecting a methodological perspective adherent to ecological-dynamic approach. The aim is to highlight the significant aspects and the uniqueness and unrepeatability of heuristic learning, starting from theoretical lines. Material and Methods. For this purpose, an accurate survey of the scientific literature has been analyzed, highlighting the points of contact and contrast of cognitive and ecological-dynamic approach. Results. In the context of physical education, the most used pedagogical approach is the linear one. Teaching is influenced by spatial and temporal constraints, spaces and equipment, with reproduction styles and with predefined tasks and motor responses. This modality promotes awareness of motor skills and not transferability to other subject areas, as indicated by ministerial documents. Non-linear pedagogy, while promoting motor learning as a consequence of the interaction between the subject and the context, shows some limits. The first concerns the learning of transversal skills and, the second concerns the use of prescriptive teaching, absent in the ecological-dynamic approach, through heuristic learning. It is necessary to overcome the areas of prescriptiveness that still resist in the paradigm most recognized by the scientific community, the Constraints Led Approach, closely related to nonlinear pedagogy. They do not favor completely a heuristic learning as the anthropometric constraints suffer from the limitation of biomechanics. Also, goal constraints are prescriptively determined by the physical education teacher, which is not compatible with heuristic learning. Conclusions. This analysis highlights the need, usefulness and usability of heuristic learning in different professional fields. The study aims to offer a new perspective on physical education objectives in the National Indications, projecting them towards a social and transversal purpose.
体育教学中启发式学习的批评与展望
背景与研究目的。生态动态方法通过任务可变性、环境约束的修改和适当使用反馈、原创和创造性的运动解决方案来促进运动学习。本研究选择了一种坚持生态动态方法的方法论视角,希望对体育活动教学打开一个批判的视角。目的是突出启发式学习的重要方面和独特性和不可重复性,从理论线开始。材料和方法。为此,对科学文献进行了准确的调查分析,突出了认知和生态动态方法的接触点和对比。结果。在体育教学中,最常用的教学方法是线性教学。教学受到空间和时间限制、空间和设备的影响,具有复制风格和预先确定的任务和运动反应。正如部长文件所指出的那样,这种方式促进了对运动技能的认识,而不是转移到其他学科领域。非线性教学法,虽然促进运动学习的结果,主体和环境之间的相互作用,显示出一些局限性。第一个是关于横向技能的学习,第二个是关于通过启发式学习使用生态动态方法中缺乏的说明性教学。有必要克服规范性领域,这些领域仍然抵制科学界最认可的范式,即与非线性教学法密切相关的约束导向方法。他们并不完全赞成启发式学习,因为人体测量学的限制受到生物力学的限制。此外,目标约束是由体育教师规定的,这与启发式学习不相容。结论。这一分析突出了启发式学习在不同专业领域的必要性、有效性和可用性。该研究旨在为国家指示中的体育教育目标提供新的视角,将其投射到社会和横向目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports
Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信