HIGH-FREQUENCY TRANSACTION DATA: A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO ASYMMETRIC MODELS

Michael Kunkler
{"title":"HIGH-FREQUENCY TRANSACTION DATA: A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO ASYMMETRIC MODELS","authors":"Michael Kunkler","doi":"10.24135/afl.v12i1.655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares two asymmetric market microstructure models, namely, the three-state asymmetric autoregressive conditional duration (AACD) model and the activity-direction-size (ADS) model. It is shown that the two models measure different aspects of the same underlying asymmetric nature of market microstructure. It is also shown that by extending the AACD model to include two size variables and adjusting for partial durations, each model’s parameter estimates can be used to estimate the other model’s parameters exactly. Thus, the two asymmetric market microstructure models are equivalent.","PeriodicalId":32128,"journal":{"name":"Applied Finance Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Finance Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24135/afl.v12i1.655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper compares two asymmetric market microstructure models, namely, the three-state asymmetric autoregressive conditional duration (AACD) model and the activity-direction-size (ADS) model. It is shown that the two models measure different aspects of the same underlying asymmetric nature of market microstructure. It is also shown that by extending the AACD model to include two size variables and adjusting for partial durations, each model’s parameter estimates can be used to estimate the other model’s parameters exactly. Thus, the two asymmetric market microstructure models are equivalent.
高频交易数据:两种非对称模型的比较
本文比较了两种非对称市场微观结构模型,即三态非对称自回归条件持续时间(AACD)模型和活动方向规模(ADS)模型。研究表明,这两个模型衡量了市场微观结构相同的不对称本质的不同方面。研究还表明,通过将AACD模型扩展为包括两个大小变量并对部分持续时间进行调整,每个模型的参数估计可以用于准确估计另一个模型的参数。因此,这两个非对称市场微观结构模型是等价的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信