A New Perspective on Hydrogen Chloride Scavenging at High Temperatures for Reducing the Smoke Acidity of PVC Cables in Fires V: Comparison between EN 60754-1 and EN 60754-2

Abstract

Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 lays down harmonized conditions for marketing construction products in the European Union. One of its consequences has been the introduction of the product standard EN 50575 and standard EN 130501-6, concerning power, control, and communication cables permanently installed in buildings to prevent the risk of a fire and its consequences. EN 13501-6 provides the reaction to fire classifications for cables, the test methods to be performed, the requirements to meet a specific reaction to fire, and additional classifications for smoke production, flaming droplets, and acidity. It requires EN 60754-2 as the technical standard to assess acidity, and it defines three classes: a1, a2, and a3 (the less performant). Due to the release of hydrogen chloride during the combustion, acidity is the weak point of PVC cables, which are not yet capable of achieving the a1 or a2 classes required for specific locations according to fire risk assessments. EN 13501-6 does not include EN 60754-1, used in harmonized standards outside the scope of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011. EN 60754-1 and EN 60754-2 are common standards for determining halogen gas content, and acidity/conductivity, respectively. While they involve the same type of test apparatus, they differ in heating regimes, final temperatures, and detection methods. In particular, EN 60754-2 requires testing at temperatures between 935–965 °C in the tube furnace, where the sample burns, the smoke is collected in bubblers, and pH and conductivity are measured as an indirect assessment of acidity. On the other hand, the temperature regime of EN 60754-1 is a gradual heating run, followed by isothermal heating at 800 °C. The paper shows that when potent acid scavengers are used in PVC compounds, performing EN 60754-2 with the thermal profile of EN 60754-1 or at 500 °C in isothermal conditions, the evolution of hydrogen chloride changes significantly up to 10 times less than the test performed in isothermal at 950 °C. The reason lies behind the kinetic of hydrogen chloride release during the combustion of PVC compounds: the higher the temperature or faster the heat release, the quicker hydrogen chloride evolution and the lower the probability for the acid scavenger to trap it. Thus, these findings emphasize the “fragility” of EN 60754-2 as a tool for assessing risks associated with the release of hydrogen chloride during fires.