Ask a Political Scientist Symposium on the Contributions of Danielle Allen: Introduction

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Polity Pub Date : 2023-08-29 DOI:10.1086/726440
Rogers M. Smith
{"title":"Ask a Political Scientist Symposium on the Contributions of Danielle Allen: Introduction","authors":"Rogers M. Smith","doi":"10.1086/726440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"WhenI entered graduate school at Harvard in 1975 as part of a strongly felt but ill-specified quest for personal and political meaning, I had no clear sense of what constituted “academic success.” Although my family had long prized college education, no one in it had ever pursued an academic career. I soon learned that there were prevailing notions of what we grad students should dream about achieving, but they were disputed. At Harvard, the highest rank was University Professor; but some University Professors were seen as having won fame outside academia, without truly major intellectual contributions. Many in academia regarded the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton, where Einstein ended up, as the Valhalla for truly major intellectual contributors. Some, however, disparaged it as a privileged haven for abstract thinkers choosing to disconnect from the real world. The figure who seemed to command the most universal respect on campus, bordering on worship, was John Rawls, who many saw as one of the greatest political philosophers not just of our time but all time. However, the impact of his then-recent magnum opus, A Theory of Justice, remained to be seen. Rawls was best known for proposing the difference principle, holding that all economic inequalities should benefit the least advantaged within the national community. Nearly a half-century later, few would be audacious enough to contend that his work has brought us much closer to that goal in America or the world. Danielle Allen is currently the James Bryant Conant University Professor at Harvard, the chair that John Rawls once held, and she was formerly the UPS Foundation Professor of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study. She directs Harvard’s Safra Center for Ethics, to which John Rawls was a seminal contributor. She is a member of the nation’s two oldest academic honorary societies, the American","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726440","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

WhenI entered graduate school at Harvard in 1975 as part of a strongly felt but ill-specified quest for personal and political meaning, I had no clear sense of what constituted “academic success.” Although my family had long prized college education, no one in it had ever pursued an academic career. I soon learned that there were prevailing notions of what we grad students should dream about achieving, but they were disputed. At Harvard, the highest rank was University Professor; but some University Professors were seen as having won fame outside academia, without truly major intellectual contributions. Many in academia regarded the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton, where Einstein ended up, as the Valhalla for truly major intellectual contributors. Some, however, disparaged it as a privileged haven for abstract thinkers choosing to disconnect from the real world. The figure who seemed to command the most universal respect on campus, bordering on worship, was John Rawls, who many saw as one of the greatest political philosophers not just of our time but all time. However, the impact of his then-recent magnum opus, A Theory of Justice, remained to be seen. Rawls was best known for proposing the difference principle, holding that all economic inequalities should benefit the least advantaged within the national community. Nearly a half-century later, few would be audacious enough to contend that his work has brought us much closer to that goal in America or the world. Danielle Allen is currently the James Bryant Conant University Professor at Harvard, the chair that John Rawls once held, and she was formerly the UPS Foundation Professor of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study. She directs Harvard’s Safra Center for Ethics, to which John Rawls was a seminal contributor. She is a member of the nation’s two oldest academic honorary societies, the American
问一个关于丹妮尔·艾伦贡献的政治学家研讨会:引言
1975年,当我进入哈佛大学研究生院时,作为对个人和政治意义强烈但不明确的追求的一部分,我对什么是“学术成功”没有明确的认识。尽管我的家人长期重视大学教育,但他们中没有人追求过学术生涯。我很快了解到,对于我们研究生应该梦想实现什么,有一些普遍的观念,但它们存在争议。在哈佛,最高级别是大学教授;但一些大学教授被视为在学术界之外赢得了声誉,却没有做出真正重大的智力贡献。许多学术界人士认为,爱因斯坦最终所在的普林斯顿高等研究院是真正重要的智力贡献者的瓦尔哈拉。然而,一些人贬低它是抽象思想家选择脱离现实世界的特权天堂。约翰·罗尔斯(John Rawls)似乎在校园里获得了最普遍的尊重,近乎崇拜,他被许多人视为不仅是我们这个时代,而且是有史以来最伟大的政治哲学家之一。然而,他最近的代表作《正义理论》的影响还有待观察。罗尔斯以提出差异原则而闻名,他认为所有经济不平等都应该使国家社会中最弱势的群体受益。近半个世纪后,很少有人敢说他的工作让我们在美国或世界上更接近了这个目标。Danielle Allen目前是哈佛大学James Bryant Conant大学教授,John Rawls曾担任该校主席,她曾是高等研究所UPS基金会社会科学教授。她是哈佛大学萨夫拉伦理中心的主任,约翰·罗尔斯是该中心的重要贡献者。她是美国历史最悠久的两个学术荣誉学会的成员,美国
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polity
Polity POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信