Clinical profile and angiographic patterns of patients undergoing treatment for in-stent restenosis and outcomes associated with the treatment

IF 0.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
S. Patil, M. Chatterjee, Natraj Setty, S. Jadhav
{"title":"Clinical profile and angiographic patterns of patients undergoing treatment for in-stent restenosis and outcomes associated with the treatment","authors":"S. Patil, M. Chatterjee, Natraj Setty, S. Jadhav","doi":"10.4103/rcm.rcm_21_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: The optimal treatment strategy for in-stent restenosis (ISR) still remains under debate. Moreover, there have been scarce data on Indian patients relating to ISR treatment. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical profile and angiographic pattern of patients with ISR and to evaluate the outcome of these patients being treated for ISR. Settings and Design: This was a cross-sectional study which consisted of patients who had coronary angiographic characteristic of ISR. Materials and Methods: Patients were divided into subgroups as per presentation, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and non-ACS. After the ISR event and treatment, the patients were followed up for a minimum period of 6 months for any adverse events. The primary outcome of the study was occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event. Statistical Analysis: Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, or Mann–Whitney test was applied according to type and distribution of variable (SPSS software). Results: One hundred patients with 109 culprit lesions of ISR were included in the study. The ACS was dominant clinical presentation mode, occurring in 62 patients. Fifty-four percent of the patients were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, 26% were managed with coronary artery bypass grafting, and 19% were treated with optimized medical therapy. Majority of the adverse events (12 out of 15 patients) occurred in the ACS group, with a statistically significant difference at 6-month follow-up (P = 0.021). Conclusion: Patients with ISR have ACS as the most common mode of presentation. Patients with ISR presenting with ACS are at high risk and must be closely monitored. The treatment of ISR with drug-eluting stent or drug-coated balloon is most effective.","PeriodicalId":21031,"journal":{"name":"Research in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"55 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/rcm.rcm_21_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The optimal treatment strategy for in-stent restenosis (ISR) still remains under debate. Moreover, there have been scarce data on Indian patients relating to ISR treatment. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical profile and angiographic pattern of patients with ISR and to evaluate the outcome of these patients being treated for ISR. Settings and Design: This was a cross-sectional study which consisted of patients who had coronary angiographic characteristic of ISR. Materials and Methods: Patients were divided into subgroups as per presentation, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and non-ACS. After the ISR event and treatment, the patients were followed up for a minimum period of 6 months for any adverse events. The primary outcome of the study was occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event. Statistical Analysis: Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, or Mann–Whitney test was applied according to type and distribution of variable (SPSS software). Results: One hundred patients with 109 culprit lesions of ISR were included in the study. The ACS was dominant clinical presentation mode, occurring in 62 patients. Fifty-four percent of the patients were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, 26% were managed with coronary artery bypass grafting, and 19% were treated with optimized medical therapy. Majority of the adverse events (12 out of 15 patients) occurred in the ACS group, with a statistically significant difference at 6-month follow-up (P = 0.021). Conclusion: Patients with ISR have ACS as the most common mode of presentation. Patients with ISR presenting with ACS are at high risk and must be closely monitored. The treatment of ISR with drug-eluting stent or drug-coated balloon is most effective.
接受支架内再狭窄治疗的患者的临床特征和血管造影模式以及与治疗相关的结果
背景:支架内再狭窄(ISR)的最佳治疗策略仍存在争议。此外,印度患者与ISR治疗相关的数据很少。目的:本研究的目的是确定ISR患者的临床特征和血管造影模式,并评估这些患者接受ISR治疗的结果。背景和设计:这是一项横断面研究,由具有ISR冠状动脉造影特征的患者组成。材料和方法:将患者按表现分为急性冠脉综合征(ACS)和非ACS亚组。在ISR事件和治疗后,对患者进行至少6个月的随访,以了解任何不良事件。该研究的主要结局是主要心脏不良事件的发生。统计分析:根据变量的类型和分布,采用卡方检验、Fisher确切检验、Student’st检验或Mann-Whitney检验(SPSS软件)。结果:纳入100例ISR罪魁祸首病变109例。ACS为主要临床表现模式,共62例。54%的患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,26%行冠状动脉旁路移植术,19%行优化药物治疗。ACS组不良事件发生率最高(15例患者中有12例),6个月随访差异有统计学意义(P = 0.021)。结论:ISR患者以ACS为主要表现形式。伴有ACS的ISR患者处于高风险,必须密切监测。药物洗脱支架或药物包被球囊治疗ISR最有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Cardiovascular Medicine
Research in Cardiovascular Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信