“To Serve This Present Age”: The Future of Worship in the Baptist Church

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Lisa M. Weaver
{"title":"“To Serve This Present Age”: The Future of Worship in the Baptist Church","authors":"Lisa M. Weaver","doi":"10.1080/0458063X.2022.2154521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the early 2000s, I had a conversation with the late Rev. Dr. Granville Allen Seward, who was at that time pastor emeritus of Mount Zion Baptist Church in Newark, New Jersey. It was during one of his annual visits to Trinity Baptist Church in The Bronx (my home church) as the Ash Wednesday preacher. The conversation with him took its usual post-preaching, post-service format: always brief, always theological. Good Baptist that he was, there was often a Scripture or a line from a hymn that were quickly recalled in service to his responses. I don’t recall what I said or asked him, but I will never forget his response: “Oh, I’m just trying to serve this present age, my calling to fulfill.” I have sung “A Charge to Keep I Have” countless times. Yet, this time the words “to serve this present age” were halting. The words had a visceral effect. It was as if I heard the profundity of those words, that phrase, “to serve this present age,” with an exhortatory-like invitation to do the same. That day was a pivotal marker in my life as a minister and a scholar because ever since then I have lived, worked, served, taught, researched, and written with the question that that phrase provokes: how does what I am doing, saying, and writing serve “this present age?” At every age and stage, the church has had to wrestle with the challenge of its present age. It has had to live in the tension of reverence and relevance: reverence for its past, its traditions, its theology, and its ecclesiology while being relevant to the people in its charge and care at the time. This has not always been done well, but this has always been a challenge present on the church’s doorstep. The question of how to “serve this present age” would be relevant today even if there had not been a global pandemic. Periodically, institutions and communities give reflection to where they have been and where they are going in order to plan for their future. The Second Vatican Council of the Roman Catholic Church is one example of this. The Coronavirus pandemic has made this question even weightier and more urgent. The pandemic has quickly, with next to no transition time, changed the way people around the world live, learn, work, and worship. Changes in how people accomplish ordinary tasks include changes in the ways that churches have had to conduct their ministries. One of the most familiar challenges that churches have historically faced has been people’s resistance to change, exemplified in the common response: “we’ve always done it this way.” The pandemic wrenched open the hands of traditionalism, wrested away the idol “we have always done it this way,” and smashed it. Clergy and congregations did not have the luxury of holding on to their practices and preferences because people","PeriodicalId":53923,"journal":{"name":"Liturgy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liturgy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0458063X.2022.2154521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the early 2000s, I had a conversation with the late Rev. Dr. Granville Allen Seward, who was at that time pastor emeritus of Mount Zion Baptist Church in Newark, New Jersey. It was during one of his annual visits to Trinity Baptist Church in The Bronx (my home church) as the Ash Wednesday preacher. The conversation with him took its usual post-preaching, post-service format: always brief, always theological. Good Baptist that he was, there was often a Scripture or a line from a hymn that were quickly recalled in service to his responses. I don’t recall what I said or asked him, but I will never forget his response: “Oh, I’m just trying to serve this present age, my calling to fulfill.” I have sung “A Charge to Keep I Have” countless times. Yet, this time the words “to serve this present age” were halting. The words had a visceral effect. It was as if I heard the profundity of those words, that phrase, “to serve this present age,” with an exhortatory-like invitation to do the same. That day was a pivotal marker in my life as a minister and a scholar because ever since then I have lived, worked, served, taught, researched, and written with the question that that phrase provokes: how does what I am doing, saying, and writing serve “this present age?” At every age and stage, the church has had to wrestle with the challenge of its present age. It has had to live in the tension of reverence and relevance: reverence for its past, its traditions, its theology, and its ecclesiology while being relevant to the people in its charge and care at the time. This has not always been done well, but this has always been a challenge present on the church’s doorstep. The question of how to “serve this present age” would be relevant today even if there had not been a global pandemic. Periodically, institutions and communities give reflection to where they have been and where they are going in order to plan for their future. The Second Vatican Council of the Roman Catholic Church is one example of this. The Coronavirus pandemic has made this question even weightier and more urgent. The pandemic has quickly, with next to no transition time, changed the way people around the world live, learn, work, and worship. Changes in how people accomplish ordinary tasks include changes in the ways that churches have had to conduct their ministries. One of the most familiar challenges that churches have historically faced has been people’s resistance to change, exemplified in the common response: “we’ve always done it this way.” The pandemic wrenched open the hands of traditionalism, wrested away the idol “we have always done it this way,” and smashed it. Clergy and congregations did not have the luxury of holding on to their practices and preferences because people
“服事今世”:浸信会敬拜的未来
21世纪初,我与已故的格兰维尔·艾伦·苏厄德(Granville Allen Seward)牧师博士进行了一次交谈,他当时是新泽西州纽瓦克锡安山浸信会(Mount Zion Baptist Church)的名誉牧师。那是在他每年一次去布朗克斯的三一浸信会(Trinity Baptist Church)(我的家乡教堂)做圣灰星期三牧师的时候。和他的谈话采取了惯常的讲道后、礼拜后的形式:总是简短,总是神学式的。虽然他是一个虔诚的浸信会教徒,但经常会有人很快地回忆起一段经文或一首赞美诗中的诗句,以帮助他做出回应。我不记得我对他说了什么或问了什么,但我永远不会忘记他的回答:“哦,我只是想为这个时代服务,完成我的使命。”我已经唱过无数遍“我有一份责任”。然而,这一次,“为这个时代服务”这几个字是断断续续的。这句话有一种发自内心的影响。我仿佛听到这句话的深意,这句话,“为今世服务”,带着一种劝诫般的邀请去做同样的事。那一天是我作为牧师和学者一生中一个关键的里程碑,因为从那以后,我一直带着这个短语引发的问题生活、工作、服务、教学、研究和写作:我所做的、所说的和所写的如何服务于“这个时代”?在每个时代和阶段,教会都必须与当今时代的挑战作斗争。它必须生活在敬畏和相关性的紧张关系中:敬畏它的过去,它的传统,它的神学,它的教会学,同时与当时它所负责和照顾的人有关。这并不总是做得很好,但这一直是摆在教堂门口的一个挑战。即使没有发生全球性大流行病,如何"为当代服务"的问题今天仍具有现实意义。各机构和社区定期反思它们的过去和未来,以便规划它们的未来。罗马天主教会的第二次梵蒂冈会议就是一个例子。冠状病毒大流行使这个问题更加沉重和紧迫。这场大流行在几乎没有过渡时间的情况下迅速改变了世界各地人们的生活、学习、工作和礼拜方式。人们完成日常工作的方式发生了变化,教会开展事工的方式也发生了变化。教会历来面临的最常见的挑战之一是人们对变革的抵制,常见的反应就是:“我们一直都是这样做的。”大流行拉开了传统主义的手,抢走了“我们一直这样做”的偶像,打碎了它。神职人员和教会不能奢侈地坚持他们的做法和偏好,因为人们
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Liturgy
Liturgy RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信