Judicial Independence in European Constitutional Law

IF 1.6 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

European Constitutional Law Review Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1017/S1574019622000347

Rafael Bustos Gisbert

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Judicial independence in the context of rule of law backsliding – a systematisation of case law from the Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights – classic dimensions of objective and subjective independence of judges – a new third dimension: the right of judges to their own independence as final safeguard

查看原文本刊更多论文

欧洲宪法中的司法独立

法治倒退背景下的司法独立——法院和欧洲人权法院判例法的系统化——法官客观和主观独立的经典层面——新的第三个层面：法官享有自身独立的权利，作为最后保障

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Constitutional Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), a peer reviewed English language journal, is a platform for advancing the study of European constitutional law, its history and evolution. Its scope is European law and constitutional law, history and theory, comparative law and jurisprudence. Published triannually, it contains articles on doctrine, scholarship and history, plus jurisprudence and book reviews. However, the premier issue includes more than twenty short articles by leading experts, each addressing a single topic in the Draft Constitutional Treaty for Europe. EuConst is addressed at academics, professionals, politicians and others involved or interested in the European constitutional process.