The Rare Disease Research Scholars Program: A training curriculum for clinical researchers with mixed methods evaluation study

D. Regier, Jennifer A. Weaver, Nancy Cheng, M. Batshaw, M. Ottolini, M. Shy, M. Summar
{"title":"The Rare Disease Research Scholars Program: A training curriculum for clinical researchers with mixed methods evaluation study","authors":"D. Regier, Jennifer A. Weaver, Nancy Cheng, M. Batshaw, M. Ottolini, M. Shy, M. Summar","doi":"10.3233/TRD-210051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rare disease clinician investigators are essential to ensure appropriate diagnosis, care, and treatment for the rapidly growing rare disease population. As these researchers are spread across many specialties, learning the unique skill set for rare disease research (RDR) can be a hurdle and may hinder progress in the field. The need for an RDR focused training program for investigators in many specialties and backgrounds was identified in a needs assessment of trainees in the NIH funded Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network. Based on this information, the Rare Disease Research Scholars Program (RDRSP) was developed. We describe the needs assessment, curriculum creation, scholar recruitment, and outcome evaluation based on four years of programmatic data (2015–2019). This one year-long RDRSP uses a blended approach that includes in-person, web-based, synchronous and asynchronous learning. We evaluated the RDRSP using quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitative measures included pre and post questionnaires about knowledge, self-efficacy, and intent to remain in RDR. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a paired t-test. Qualitative semi-structured interviews explored the RDR scholars’ perceptions of the RDRSP; thematic analysis examined the textual data. Quantitative pre- and post-measures were statistically significant in the following areas: 1) improved knowledge content in RDR, 2) enhanced self-efficacy in clinical research, and 3) intent to remain in the field of RDR. Qualitative data analysis found the program supported the development of the scholar’s research skills as well as ‘soft-skills’. By combining training of skills unique to RDR with the more general topics of leadership, mentorship and collaboration among participants in diverse specialties, we created a program that supports the development of the next generation of rare disease clinician investigators and serves as a model for training in other niche research areas.","PeriodicalId":75246,"journal":{"name":"Translational science of rare diseases","volume":"6 1","pages":"1 - 11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational science of rare diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/TRD-210051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Rare disease clinician investigators are essential to ensure appropriate diagnosis, care, and treatment for the rapidly growing rare disease population. As these researchers are spread across many specialties, learning the unique skill set for rare disease research (RDR) can be a hurdle and may hinder progress in the field. The need for an RDR focused training program for investigators in many specialties and backgrounds was identified in a needs assessment of trainees in the NIH funded Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network. Based on this information, the Rare Disease Research Scholars Program (RDRSP) was developed. We describe the needs assessment, curriculum creation, scholar recruitment, and outcome evaluation based on four years of programmatic data (2015–2019). This one year-long RDRSP uses a blended approach that includes in-person, web-based, synchronous and asynchronous learning. We evaluated the RDRSP using quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitative measures included pre and post questionnaires about knowledge, self-efficacy, and intent to remain in RDR. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a paired t-test. Qualitative semi-structured interviews explored the RDR scholars’ perceptions of the RDRSP; thematic analysis examined the textual data. Quantitative pre- and post-measures were statistically significant in the following areas: 1) improved knowledge content in RDR, 2) enhanced self-efficacy in clinical research, and 3) intent to remain in the field of RDR. Qualitative data analysis found the program supported the development of the scholar’s research skills as well as ‘soft-skills’. By combining training of skills unique to RDR with the more general topics of leadership, mentorship and collaboration among participants in diverse specialties, we created a program that supports the development of the next generation of rare disease clinician investigators and serves as a model for training in other niche research areas.
罕见病研究学者计划:临床研究人员混合方法评估研究的培训课程
罕见病临床研究人员是必不可少的,以确保适当的诊断,护理和治疗快速增长的罕见病人群。由于这些研究人员分布在许多专业,学习罕见病研究(RDR)的独特技能集可能是一个障碍,并可能阻碍该领域的进展。在美国国立卫生研究院资助的罕见病临床研究网络对受训者的需求评估中,确定了对许多专业和背景的研究人员进行RDR重点培训计划的需求。基于这些信息,罕见病研究学者计划(RDRSP)被开发出来。我们描述了需求评估、课程创建、学者招募和基于四年规划数据(2015-2019)的结果评估。这个为期一年的RDRSP采用了一种混合的方法,包括面对面、基于网络、同步和异步学习。我们使用定量和定性方法评估RDRSP。定量测量包括前后关于知识、自我效能和留在RDR的意图的问卷调查。数据分析采用描述性统计和配对t检验。定性半结构化访谈探讨了RDR学者对RDRSP的看法;主题分析考察了文本数据。定量的前后测量在以下方面有统计学意义:1)提高了RDR的知识含量,2)提高了临床研究的自我效能感,3)留在RDR领域的意愿。定性数据分析发现,该计划支持了学者的研究技能和“软技能”的发展。通过将RDR特有的技能培训与不同专业参与者之间的领导、指导和合作等更一般的主题相结合,我们创建了一个支持下一代罕见病临床研究人员发展的项目,并作为其他利基研究领域培训的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信