Concurrent Traumatic Brain Injury with Craniofacial Trauma: A 10-Year Analysis of a Single Institution’s Trauma Registry

Yuchen You, Javier Romero, Graal Diaz, R. Evans
{"title":"Concurrent Traumatic Brain Injury with Craniofacial Trauma: A 10-Year Analysis of a Single Institution’s Trauma Registry","authors":"Yuchen You, Javier Romero, Graal Diaz, R. Evans","doi":"10.3390/traumacare3030011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Craniofacial injuries are thought to be commonly associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI), but there is conflicting evidence in the literature. This retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the incidence of TBI in patients with craniofacial trauma. Methods: The study included 2982 consecutive patients with either solitary or concurrent diagnoses of TBI and facial fractures, seen and evaluated at a single level II trauma center between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020. Continuous variables were compared against whether the patient had one or both diagnoses. Results: Of the target population, 55.8% had a solitary diagnosis of TBI; 30.28% had a solitary diagnosis of facial fractures; and 13.92% had concurrent diagnoses of both TBI and facial fractures. Patients with concurrent diagnoses had a significantly longer mean length of stay (LOS) compared to those with solitary diagnoses (9.92 ± 16.33 days vs. 6.21 ± 10.96 days, p < 0.01), but age (p = 0.68) and ICU LOS (p = 0.09) did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusions: Trauma to the face should be given special attention due to the increased chance of TBI with craniofacial fractures. Patients with concurrent diagnoses of TBI and facial fractures had worse hospital outcomes than those with solitary diagnoses of either TBI or facial trauma.","PeriodicalId":75251,"journal":{"name":"Trauma care (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma care (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare3030011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Craniofacial injuries are thought to be commonly associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI), but there is conflicting evidence in the literature. This retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the incidence of TBI in patients with craniofacial trauma. Methods: The study included 2982 consecutive patients with either solitary or concurrent diagnoses of TBI and facial fractures, seen and evaluated at a single level II trauma center between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020. Continuous variables were compared against whether the patient had one or both diagnoses. Results: Of the target population, 55.8% had a solitary diagnosis of TBI; 30.28% had a solitary diagnosis of facial fractures; and 13.92% had concurrent diagnoses of both TBI and facial fractures. Patients with concurrent diagnoses had a significantly longer mean length of stay (LOS) compared to those with solitary diagnoses (9.92 ± 16.33 days vs. 6.21 ± 10.96 days, p < 0.01), but age (p = 0.68) and ICU LOS (p = 0.09) did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusions: Trauma to the face should be given special attention due to the increased chance of TBI with craniofacial fractures. Patients with concurrent diagnoses of TBI and facial fractures had worse hospital outcomes than those with solitary diagnoses of either TBI or facial trauma.
并发创伤性脑损伤伴颅面创伤:一个机构创伤登记的10年分析
背景:颅面损伤通常被认为与创伤性脑损伤(TBI)有关,但文献中存在相互矛盾的证据。本回顾性队列研究旨在评估颅面创伤患者TBI的发生率。方法:该研究纳入了2982例连续的TBI和面部骨折患者,这些患者要么单独诊断,要么同时诊断,于2010年1月1日至2020年12月31日在一个二级创伤中心就诊并评估。将连续变量与患者是否有一种或两种诊断进行比较。结果:55.8%的目标人群单独诊断为TBI;30.28%单独诊断为面部骨折;13.92%同时诊断为创伤性脑损伤和面部骨折。合并诊断患者的平均住院时间(LOS)明显长于单独诊断患者(9.92±16.33天vs. 6.21±10.96天,p < 0.01),但两组患者的年龄(p = 0.68)和ICU LOS (p = 0.09)差异无统计学意义。结论:由于TBI合并颅面骨折的可能性增加,面部外伤应给予特别关注。同时诊断为TBI和面部骨折的患者比单独诊断为TBI或面部创伤的患者的医院预后更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信