Les démocraties du tirage au sort

Q4 Social Sciences

Raisons Politiques Pub Date : 2021-06-24 DOI:10.3917/rai.082.0013

Dimitri Courant

{"title":"Les démocraties du tirage au sort","authors":"Dimitri Courant","doi":"10.3917/rai.082.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Democracies of Sortition. Legitimacies and Institutional Models in Conflict Randomly selected deliberative mini-publics are on the rise all over the world. However, those devices remain almost always ad hoc, opening the door to arbitrary maneuver and triggering a debate on their future stabilization. What are the competing proposals aiming at institutionalizing sortition within political systems? I identify four institutional models of democracy, relying on opposing views of legitimacy and of politics: tokenistic consultation, radical democracy, empowered clerocracy and hybrid polyarchy. Each of those models of democracy are distincts by their visions of conflict and of representation. Some models think mini-publics as tools for legitimizing elected officials and for bypassing social conflicts, others see in sortition a way to give power to the people in a struggle against delegitimized elites, finally others make sortition a way to avoid any vote, in election or referendum. Les démocraties du tirage au sort 31 © P re ss es d e S ci en ce s P o | T él éc ha rg é le 2 4/ 06 /2 02 1 su r w w w .c ai rn .in fo p ar vi a U ni ve rs ité d e La us an ne ( IP : 6 4. 11 2. 17 7. 2) © P reses de S cinces P o | T éléhargé le 246/2021 ur w w w .can.info ar ia U nirsité de Lasanne IP : 64.1.177.2)","PeriodicalId":35193,"journal":{"name":"Raisons Politiques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Raisons Politiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rai.082.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Democracies of Sortition. Legitimacies and Institutional Models in Conflict Randomly selected deliberative mini-publics are on the rise all over the world. However, those devices remain almost always ad hoc, opening the door to arbitrary maneuver and triggering a debate on their future stabilization. What are the competing proposals aiming at institutionalizing sortition within political systems? I identify four institutional models of democracy, relying on opposing views of legitimacy and of politics: tokenistic consultation, radical democracy, empowered clerocracy and hybrid polyarchy. Each of those models of democracy are distincts by their visions of conflict and of representation. Some models think mini-publics as tools for legitimizing elected officials and for bypassing social conflicts, others see in sortition a way to give power to the people in a struggle against delegitimized elites, finally others make sortition a way to avoid any vote, in election or referendum. Les démocraties du tirage au sort 31 © P re ss es d e S ci en ce s P o | T él éc ha rg é le 2 4/ 06 /2 02 1 su r w w w .c ai rn .in fo p ar vi a U ni ve rs ité d e La us an ne ( IP : 6 4. 11 2. 17 7. 2) © P reses de S cinces P o | T éléhargé le 246/2021 ur w w w .can.info ar ia U nirsité de Lasanne IP : 64.1.177.2)

查看原文本刊更多论文

抽签的民主

分立的民主。在世界范围内，随机选择的协商迷你公众正在兴起。然而，这些设备几乎总是临时的，为任意操作打开了大门，并引发了对其未来稳定性的辩论。旨在使政治体制内的解决方案制度化的竞争性建议是什么?基于对合法性和政治的对立观点，我确定了四种民主制度模式:象征性协商、激进民主、授权的神职人员民主和混合多元政治。每一种民主模式都因其对冲突和代表权的看法而与众不同。一些模型认为迷你公众是使民选官员合法化和绕过社会冲突的工具，另一些模型认为，在与非法精英的斗争中，解决方案是一种将权力交给人民的方式，最后还有一些模型认为解决方案是一种避免在选举或公投中投票的方式。Les democraties du香槟酒发酵盟排序31©P re党卫军es d e ci在ce年代P o | T el ec ha rg e苏勒2 4 / 06 / 2 02 1 r w w w . c ai rn在fo P ar vi U倪ve rs尽管d e拉我们一个ne (IP: 6 4。11 2。17日7。2)©P reses de S cinces P o b| T 身体健康和身体健康之间的关系(ei: 64.177.2)

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Raisons Politiques Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Revue de pensée et de théorie politiques fondée en 2000, Raisons politiques inscrit l"interrogation philosophique dans la Cité. Revue thématique, elle ouvre le dialogue entre les sciences humaines et sociales et réfléchit, loin de toutes les contraintes institutionnelles, aux enjeux du débat politique, économique et social. Raisons politiques favorise la rencontre entre auteurs confirmés et jeunes chercheurs. Attentive à l"actualité scientifique et à ses acteurs, elle publie des parcours de recherche de grands auteurs contemporains et s"attache à dénouer la complexité des pensées politiques et leur évolution.