The Chinese Conception of the Rule of Law and Its Embodiment Under the ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative (BRI)

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Luyao Che
{"title":"The Chinese Conception of the Rule of Law and Its Embodiment Under the ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative (BRI)","authors":"Luyao Che","doi":"10.54648/trad2021007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although China has consolidated the aim of reforming its society towards the rule of law, the Chinese version of the rule of law differs significantly from its counterparts in the Western tradition. Increasing attention is being paid to the peculiarities of the Chinese conception as China strives to expand its influence through launching the ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative (BRI). This article focuses on the question of whether and by what means various BRI projects are impacted by and impact upon the Chinese conception of the rule of law. The uniqueness of the Chinese approach can be examined from three dimensions: the ontological dimension, describing the preference for integration over convergence in the governance models of economies; the epistemological dimension, in which a posteriori justifications prevail over a priori ones; and the methodological dimension, in which the coordination between the public and the private spheres overshadows the confrontation between them. Following this, the paper profiles the practices of BRI investment and assesses whether these practices present consistently with the Chinese conception. Finally, this article examined the strong needs often embedded within BRI projects that call for sustainable cooperation, market-generating governmental intervention, as well as the coordination of various social interests. All these factors are consistent with the peculiarity of the Chinese conception of the rule of law. The paper argues that the BRI is highly consistent with the Chinese conception of the rule of law and may help further enhance it. This conclusion further suggests that the distinctive conception is not solely the result of ideological or political factors but also of the unique demands of certain types of economic undertakings.\nWorld Trade Organization, WTO, World Economic Forum, WEF, business community, stakeholder engagement, institutional change, collaboration, reform (OFDI), state-owned enterprises (SOEs), state-directed economies","PeriodicalId":46019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Trade","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Trade","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2021007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Although China has consolidated the aim of reforming its society towards the rule of law, the Chinese version of the rule of law differs significantly from its counterparts in the Western tradition. Increasing attention is being paid to the peculiarities of the Chinese conception as China strives to expand its influence through launching the ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative (BRI). This article focuses on the question of whether and by what means various BRI projects are impacted by and impact upon the Chinese conception of the rule of law. The uniqueness of the Chinese approach can be examined from three dimensions: the ontological dimension, describing the preference for integration over convergence in the governance models of economies; the epistemological dimension, in which a posteriori justifications prevail over a priori ones; and the methodological dimension, in which the coordination between the public and the private spheres overshadows the confrontation between them. Following this, the paper profiles the practices of BRI investment and assesses whether these practices present consistently with the Chinese conception. Finally, this article examined the strong needs often embedded within BRI projects that call for sustainable cooperation, market-generating governmental intervention, as well as the coordination of various social interests. All these factors are consistent with the peculiarity of the Chinese conception of the rule of law. The paper argues that the BRI is highly consistent with the Chinese conception of the rule of law and may help further enhance it. This conclusion further suggests that the distinctive conception is not solely the result of ideological or political factors but also of the unique demands of certain types of economic undertakings. World Trade Organization, WTO, World Economic Forum, WEF, business community, stakeholder engagement, institutional change, collaboration, reform (OFDI), state-owned enterprises (SOEs), state-directed economies
中国法治理念及其在“一带一路”倡议下的体现
虽然中国已经确立了向法治方向改革社会的目标,但中国版本的法治与西方传统的法治有很大的不同。随着中国通过发起“一带一路”倡议(BRI)努力扩大其影响力,人们越来越关注中国概念的特殊性。本文关注的问题是,各种“一带一路”项目是否以及以何种方式受到中国法治理念的影响和影响。中国方法的独特性可以从三个维度来考察:本体论维度,描述了经济体治理模式中对整合的偏好;认识论的维度,即事后的证明优于先验的证明;在方法论方面,公共领域和私人领域之间的协调掩盖了它们之间的对抗。接下来,本文介绍了“一带一路”投资的实践,并评估了这些实践是否与中国的理念一致。最后,本文考察了“一带一路”项目中经常包含的强烈需求,这些需求要求可持续合作、产生市场的政府干预以及各种社会利益的协调。这些因素都与中国法治理念的特殊性相一致。本文认为,“一带一路”倡议与中国的法治理念高度一致,可能有助于进一步加强法治。这一结论进一步表明,这种独特的概念不仅是意识形态或政治因素的结果,也是某些类型的经济事业的独特要求的结果。世界贸易组织、世界贸易组织、世界经济论坛、工商界、利益相关者参与、制度变革、合作、改革(对外直接投资)、国有企业、国家指导经济
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Far and away the most thought-provoking and informative journal in its field, the Journal of World Trade sets the agenda for both scholarship and policy initiatives in this most critical area of international relations. It is the only journal which deals authoritatively with the most crucial issues affecting world trade today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信