Self-help and masculinity

IF 0.7 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
A. Krendel
{"title":"Self-help and masculinity","authors":"A. Krendel","doi":"10.1075/ps.21075.kre","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study investigates the interactional norms of a manosphere discussion forum known as The Red Pill\n (TRP), and asks whether it can be conceptualised as a self-help group. 2104 posts and comments from regular users and\n high-status users in the community were analysed qualitatively to determine how the community is characterised by certain speech\n acts, and how these speech acts correspond to face-enhancement and face-threat as well as to certain impression management\n strategies.\n Since personal disclosure, advice-giving, and face-enhancement are key characteristics of TRP, it\n could be argued that TRP shares some functional characteristics with self-help communities. However, much of the\n advice given is unsolicited, a disproportionately high rate of face-enhancement is directed towards high-status users, and speech\n acts such as elaborating, and some advice-giving and personal disclosure seem to be used for self-promotion purposes. Furthermore,\n the prevalence of unhedged face-threats sets TRP apart from traditional supportive communities.","PeriodicalId":44036,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics and Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21075.kre","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the interactional norms of a manosphere discussion forum known as The Red Pill (TRP), and asks whether it can be conceptualised as a self-help group. 2104 posts and comments from regular users and high-status users in the community were analysed qualitatively to determine how the community is characterised by certain speech acts, and how these speech acts correspond to face-enhancement and face-threat as well as to certain impression management strategies. Since personal disclosure, advice-giving, and face-enhancement are key characteristics of TRP, it could be argued that TRP shares some functional characteristics with self-help communities. However, much of the advice given is unsolicited, a disproportionately high rate of face-enhancement is directed towards high-status users, and speech acts such as elaborating, and some advice-giving and personal disclosure seem to be used for self-promotion purposes. Furthermore, the prevalence of unhedged face-threats sets TRP apart from traditional supportive communities.
自助与男子气概
这项研究调查了一个名为“红色药丸”(TRP)的庄园讨论论坛的互动规范,并询问它是否可以被概念化为一个自助团体。对社区中普通用户和高地位用户的2104条帖子和评论进行了定性分析,以确定社区的某些言语行为是如何表征的,以及这些言语行为如何与面部增强和面部威胁以及某些印象管理策略相对应。由于个人披露、提供建议和提高面子是TRP的关键特征,可以说TRP与自助社区有一些共同的功能特征。然而,提供的大部分建议都是主动提出的,高比例的面部提升是针对高地位用户的,而诸如阐述、一些建议和个人披露等言论行为似乎被用于自我推销目的。此外,未经治疗的面部威胁的普遍性使TRP与传统的支持性社区不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信