‘Say hi to the lady on the television’: A review of clinic presentations and comparison of telepsychiatry and in-person mental health assessments for people with intellectual disability in rural New South Wales

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Madeline Delves, Georgina M. Luscombe, Rodney Juratowitch, Radha Srikanth, Julian N. Trollor, Dale Brown, Angela Embury
{"title":"‘Say hi to the lady on the television’: A review of clinic presentations and comparison of telepsychiatry and in-person mental health assessments for people with intellectual disability in rural New South Wales","authors":"Madeline Delves,&nbsp;Georgina M. Luscombe,&nbsp;Rodney Juratowitch,&nbsp;Radha Srikanth,&nbsp;Julian N. Trollor,&nbsp;Dale Brown,&nbsp;Angela Embury","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>People with intellectual disabilities (ID) experience high levels of psychiatric comorbidity and difficulties accessing services, particularly in rural areas. An Intellectual Disability Mental Health Outreach Clinic was established to provide specialised psychiatric care in rural Australia through telepsychiatry and in-person assessment. The study aims were to (i) contrast the characteristics of clinic attendees assessed by telepsychiatry or in-person; (ii) assess the feasibility of care delivery by synchronous videoconference (telepsychiatry) or in-person; and (iii) assess acceptability to, and experiences of, participating carers (family members, non-government organisation workers or Community Mental Health Case Managers). An audit of clinical records was conducted of clients reviewed by the Clinic between August 2018 and April 2021. A survey of carers, either employed or family members, evaluated Clinic acceptability and experiences with the Clinic assessment, and as well as perceptions of thoroughness, accessibility, and ease. Of 145 people with ID, 46% were reviewed by telepsychiatry. These 67 telepsychiatry clients were more likely to have milder ID (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and were seen more frequently (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) than the 78 clients with in-person reviews. Results from the carer survey (31.7% response rate, <i>n =</i> 46/145) indicated high overall service acceptability, with telepsychiatry perceived to offer more convenient appointment times (91% agreed vs. 75% of in-person, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The high uptake of telepsychiatric review indicates that it is feasible and acceptable to carers of people with ID and comorbid mental health concerns. Telepsychiatry is a potential tool to address equity of access to mental health services for people with ID—particularly those from disadvantaged and rural populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"20 2","pages":"177-191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12448","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12448","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People with intellectual disabilities (ID) experience high levels of psychiatric comorbidity and difficulties accessing services, particularly in rural areas. An Intellectual Disability Mental Health Outreach Clinic was established to provide specialised psychiatric care in rural Australia through telepsychiatry and in-person assessment. The study aims were to (i) contrast the characteristics of clinic attendees assessed by telepsychiatry or in-person; (ii) assess the feasibility of care delivery by synchronous videoconference (telepsychiatry) or in-person; and (iii) assess acceptability to, and experiences of, participating carers (family members, non-government organisation workers or Community Mental Health Case Managers). An audit of clinical records was conducted of clients reviewed by the Clinic between August 2018 and April 2021. A survey of carers, either employed or family members, evaluated Clinic acceptability and experiences with the Clinic assessment, and as well as perceptions of thoroughness, accessibility, and ease. Of 145 people with ID, 46% were reviewed by telepsychiatry. These 67 telepsychiatry clients were more likely to have milder ID (p < 0.01) and were seen more frequently (p < 0.05) than the 78 clients with in-person reviews. Results from the carer survey (31.7% response rate, n = 46/145) indicated high overall service acceptability, with telepsychiatry perceived to offer more convenient appointment times (91% agreed vs. 75% of in-person, p < 0.05). The high uptake of telepsychiatric review indicates that it is feasible and acceptable to carers of people with ID and comorbid mental health concerns. Telepsychiatry is a potential tool to address equity of access to mental health services for people with ID—particularly those from disadvantaged and rural populations.

“向电视上的女士问好”:对新南威尔士州农村智力残疾人士的远程精神病学和当面心理健康评估的临床表现和比较的回顾
智力残疾者有很高的精神合并症,难以获得服务,特别是在农村地区。建立了一个智力残疾心理健康外展诊所,通过远程精神病学和亲自评估,在澳大利亚农村提供专门的精神护理。该研究的目的是:(i)对比通过远程精神病学或面对面评估的临床参加者的特征;(ii)评估通过同步视频会议(远程精神病学)或面对面提供护理的可行性;(iii)评估参与照顾者(家庭成员、非政府组织工作人员或社区精神健康个案管理员)的可接受性和经验。对诊所在2018年8月至2021年4月期间审查的客户进行了临床记录审计。对受雇或家庭成员的护理人员进行调查,评估诊所的可接受性和临床评估的经验,以及对彻彻性,可及性和易用性的看法。在145名ID患者中,46%的人接受了远程精神病学的检查。这67名远程精神病患者更有可能有较轻的ID (p < 0.01),并且比78名面对面评估的患者更频繁(p < 0.05)。护理人员调查的结果(31.7%的回复率,n = 46/145)表明,整体服务可接受性较高,远程精神病学被认为提供了更方便的预约时间(91%的人同意,面对面的75%,p < 0.05)。远程精神病学审查的高度接受表明,它是可行的和可接受的照顾者与身份证和共病的精神健康问题。远程精神病学是解决id患者,特别是弱势群体和农村人口公平获得精神卫生服务问题的一个潜在工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信