CHEEKY MONUMENTS: PHOTO-ENGRAVED HEADSTONES AND IMAGE MODERATION IN CEMETERIES

Sam Holleran
{"title":"CHEEKY MONUMENTS: PHOTO-ENGRAVED HEADSTONES AND IMAGE MODERATION IN CEMETERIES","authors":"Sam Holleran","doi":"10.1080/17540763.2022.2150880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For centuries headstone carving was in the hands of select groups: priestly castes, stonemason guilds, and cemetery operators. Today, stone markets are globalised; religiosity, and accompanying rituals, have waned in many countries; and cheap, on-demand laser engraving allows for the easy transfer of photographic images to polished stone surfaces. With these changes have come new challenges for those tasked with moderating the visual environment of the cemetery. This paper explores controversial headstone imagery by combining insights into the ‘deathcare’ industry taken from anthropological fieldwork with a media analysis of several headstone controversies in the US, UK, and Australia. It looks at the actions taken by cemetery personnel to remove or amend images considered inappropriate and reflects on the changing roles of those tasked with moderating headstone content and their interactions with tradespeople, who execute designs, and the clients, who purchase headstones for loved ones. Lastly, this paper analyses how headstone moderation relates to broader conversations on censorship and offence; including ‘cheeky’ content that walks the line between permissible and impermissible in the cemetery setting.","PeriodicalId":39970,"journal":{"name":"Photographies","volume":"16 1","pages":"49 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photographies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2022.2150880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For centuries headstone carving was in the hands of select groups: priestly castes, stonemason guilds, and cemetery operators. Today, stone markets are globalised; religiosity, and accompanying rituals, have waned in many countries; and cheap, on-demand laser engraving allows for the easy transfer of photographic images to polished stone surfaces. With these changes have come new challenges for those tasked with moderating the visual environment of the cemetery. This paper explores controversial headstone imagery by combining insights into the ‘deathcare’ industry taken from anthropological fieldwork with a media analysis of several headstone controversies in the US, UK, and Australia. It looks at the actions taken by cemetery personnel to remove or amend images considered inappropriate and reflects on the changing roles of those tasked with moderating headstone content and their interactions with tradespeople, who execute designs, and the clients, who purchase headstones for loved ones. Lastly, this paper analyses how headstone moderation relates to broader conversations on censorship and offence; including ‘cheeky’ content that walks the line between permissible and impermissible in the cemetery setting.
厚颜无耻的纪念碑:照片雕刻的墓碑和公墓中的形象缓和
几个世纪以来,墓碑雕刻都掌握在一些特定的群体手中:牧师种姓、石匠协会和墓地经营者。如今,石材市场已经全球化;宗教信仰和伴随而来的仪式在许多国家已经衰落;廉价的、按需的激光雕刻可以轻松地将照片图像转移到抛光的石头表面。随着这些变化,负责调节墓地视觉环境的人面临着新的挑战。本文结合人类学田野调查中对“临终关怀”行业的见解,以及对美国、英国和澳大利亚几处墓碑争议的媒体分析,探讨了有争议的墓碑图像。它着眼于墓地工作人员为删除或修改被认为不合适的图像而采取的行动,并反思了负责调节墓碑内容的人的角色变化,以及他们与执行设计的商人和为亲人购买墓碑的客户的互动。最后,本文分析了墓碑节制与更广泛的审查和犯罪对话之间的关系;包括在墓地环境中介于允许和不允许之间的“厚脸皮”内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Photographies
Photographies Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信