Mandato constitucional de determinación y delitos imprudentes de homicidio y lesiones

Q3 Social Sciences
Lautaro Contreras Chaimovich
{"title":"Mandato constitucional de determinación y delitos imprudentes de homicidio y lesiones","authors":"Lautaro Contreras Chaimovich","doi":"10.4067/S0718-33992021000100164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl presente trabajo busca dar respuesta a la pregunta de si la regulacion de los delitos imprudentes de homicidio y lesiones, contemplada en el Codigo Penal chileno, satisface el mandato constitucional de determinacion, previsto en el inc. final del art. 19 no3 de la Constitucion Politica chilena. Para ello, se analiza la finalidad del mandato de determinacion y las exigencias que impone al legislador penal. Seguidamente, se exponen y revisan criticamente los argumentos de los autores del Derecho aleman que han planteado la inconstitucionalidad de los delitos imprudentes de homicidio y lesiones. Finalmente, se examina la compatibilidad de los tipos imprudentes de homicidio y lesiones, previstos en el Codigo Penal chileno, con el mandato constitucional de determinacion. EnglishThe article addresses the question of whether the regulation of the crimes of negligent homicide and injuries, contemplated in the Chilean Criminal Code, satisfies the constitutional principle of legality in criminal law, established in the final subparagraph of article 19 n°3 of the Political Constitution. This article analyses the purpose of the principle of legality, as well as the requirements that it imposes over the legislator of criminal law. Then, it exposes and critically review the arguments of scholars who, in the context of German law, have proposed the unconstitutionality of the crimes of negligent homicide and injuries. Finally, this article examines the compatibility between the crimes of negligent homicide and injuries, established in the Chilean Criminal Code, and the constitutional principle of legality in criminal law.","PeriodicalId":38693,"journal":{"name":"Politica Criminal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politica Criminal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33992021000100164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

espanolEl presente trabajo busca dar respuesta a la pregunta de si la regulacion de los delitos imprudentes de homicidio y lesiones, contemplada en el Codigo Penal chileno, satisface el mandato constitucional de determinacion, previsto en el inc. final del art. 19 no3 de la Constitucion Politica chilena. Para ello, se analiza la finalidad del mandato de determinacion y las exigencias que impone al legislador penal. Seguidamente, se exponen y revisan criticamente los argumentos de los autores del Derecho aleman que han planteado la inconstitucionalidad de los delitos imprudentes de homicidio y lesiones. Finalmente, se examina la compatibilidad de los tipos imprudentes de homicidio y lesiones, previstos en el Codigo Penal chileno, con el mandato constitucional de determinacion. EnglishThe article addresses the question of whether the regulation of the crimes of negligent homicide and injuries, contemplated in the Chilean Criminal Code, satisfies the constitutional principle of legality in criminal law, established in the final subparagraph of article 19 n°3 of the Political Constitution. This article analyses the purpose of the principle of legality, as well as the requirements that it imposes over the legislator of criminal law. Then, it exposes and critically review the arguments of scholars who, in the context of German law, have proposed the unconstitutionality of the crimes of negligent homicide and injuries. Finally, this article examines the compatibility between the crimes of negligent homicide and injuries, established in the Chilean Criminal Code, and the constitutional principle of legality in criminal law.
确定和轻率杀人和伤害罪行的宪法授权
西班牙目前的工作旨在回答智利《刑法》对过失杀人和伤害罪的规定是否符合《智利政治宪法》第19条第3款最后一句规定的宪法确定任务的问题。为此,分析了确定任务的目的及其对刑事立法机构的要求。然后,对德国法律作者提出的鲁莽杀人和伤害罪违宪的论点进行了阐述和批判性审查。最后,审查了《智利刑法》规定的鲁莽类型的谋杀和伤害是否符合宪法规定的确定任务。英文本条涉及《智利刑法》对过失杀人和伤害罪的规定是否符合《政治宪法》第19条第3款最后一款规定的刑法合法性宪法原则的问题。本文分析了合法性原则的目的,以及它对刑法立法者的要求。然后,它阐述并批判性地审查了学者的论点,他们在德国法律的范围内,提出了过失杀人和伤害罪的违宪性。最后,本条审查了《智利刑法》规定的过失杀人罪和伤害罪与刑法中的合法性宪法原则之间的兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Politica Criminal
Politica Criminal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信