Bioethics on dialogue

Q2 Arts and Humanities
L. Palazzani
{"title":"Bioethics on dialogue","authors":"L. Palazzani","doi":"10.4081/mem.2023.1232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bioethics is dialogical as a ‘bridge’ between two cultures, scientific culture and humanistic culture and because of pluralism. The article analyzes the different theoretical ways to conceive dialogue in the liberal-libertarian perspective (as negotiation procedures), in the utilitarian vision (agreed calculation of convenience) and personalist view (recognition of the dignity of each human being). Bioethics Committees play a key role, both at national, regional and international levels, engaging in dialogue, considering both interdisciplinarity and pluralism in order to identify (if possible) an ‘ethical mediation’, which should not be reduced to a mere compromise or pragmatic agreement, but as a minimum level (or maximum possible level) of shared ethical principles/values on specific topics. Beyond the institutionalization of Bioethics with the Committees, the role of ‘active citizenship’ and ‘citizen participation’ is growing in importance in bioethics, along with the need to build platforms for dialogue with society (beyond experts), which enable dynamic updating and active interaction between experts and citizens.","PeriodicalId":36708,"journal":{"name":"Medicina e Morale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina e Morale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2023.1232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bioethics is dialogical as a ‘bridge’ between two cultures, scientific culture and humanistic culture and because of pluralism. The article analyzes the different theoretical ways to conceive dialogue in the liberal-libertarian perspective (as negotiation procedures), in the utilitarian vision (agreed calculation of convenience) and personalist view (recognition of the dignity of each human being). Bioethics Committees play a key role, both at national, regional and international levels, engaging in dialogue, considering both interdisciplinarity and pluralism in order to identify (if possible) an ‘ethical mediation’, which should not be reduced to a mere compromise or pragmatic agreement, but as a minimum level (or maximum possible level) of shared ethical principles/values on specific topics. Beyond the institutionalization of Bioethics with the Committees, the role of ‘active citizenship’ and ‘citizen participation’ is growing in importance in bioethics, along with the need to build platforms for dialogue with society (beyond experts), which enable dynamic updating and active interaction between experts and citizens.
对话中的生物伦理学
生物伦理学是科学文化和人文文化两种文化之间的“桥梁”,也是多元主义的产物。本文分析了自由自由主义视角下(作为谈判程序)、功利主义视角下(商定的便利计算)和个人化视角下(承认每个人的尊严)对对话的不同理论构想。生物伦理委员会在国家、区域和国际各级发挥着关键作用,参与对话,考虑跨学科和多元主义,以确定(如果可能的话)一种“道德调解”,这种调解不应被简化为仅仅的妥协或务实协议,而是作为关于特定主题的共同道德原则/价值观的最低水平(或最大可能水平)。除了与委员会一起将生物伦理学制度化之外,“积极公民身份”和“公民参与”在生物伦理学中的作用也越来越重要,同时需要建立与社会对话的平台(专家之外),从而实现专家与公民之间的动态更新和积极互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina e Morale
Medicina e Morale Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信