Maria Cecília Eduardo, Juliana Inez Luiz de Souza, Rodrigo Rossi Horochovski
{"title":"What do we know about campaign finance and gender so far? The scoping review as an analysis tool with a feminist approach","authors":"Maria Cecília Eduardo, Juliana Inez Luiz de Souza, Rodrigo Rossi Horochovski","doi":"10.18002/cg.i18.7587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to present the scoping review as an analysis tool for the feminist debate. Through the use of this bibliometric technique, we surveyed the academic production of two central themes of political science: campaign finance and female political participation. To understand what has the literature shown us so far, we produced a state of the art based on 51 articles found in two databases (Scopus and Web of Science). We could see that even with the increase in production on these themes, the male authorship status quo remains, and gender-related issues in political processes continue to be peripheral in the debate. This fact reinforces the need for a feminist perspective that looks at gender beyond an analysis variable.","PeriodicalId":55809,"journal":{"name":"Cuestiones de Genero de la Igualdad y la Diferencia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuestiones de Genero de la Igualdad y la Diferencia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18002/cg.i18.7587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper aims to present the scoping review as an analysis tool for the feminist debate. Through the use of this bibliometric technique, we surveyed the academic production of two central themes of political science: campaign finance and female political participation. To understand what has the literature shown us so far, we produced a state of the art based on 51 articles found in two databases (Scopus and Web of Science). We could see that even with the increase in production on these themes, the male authorship status quo remains, and gender-related issues in political processes continue to be peripheral in the debate. This fact reinforces the need for a feminist perspective that looks at gender beyond an analysis variable.
本文旨在将范围界定审查作为女权主义辩论的分析工具。通过使用这种文献计量技术,我们调查了政治学两个中心主题的学术成果:竞选资金和女性政治参与。为了了解到目前为止文献向我们展示了什么,我们根据在两个数据库(Scopus和Web of Science)中发现的51篇文章制作了一个最新的技术。我们可以看到,即使这些主题的制作有所增加,男性作者的现状仍然存在,政治进程中与性别相关的问题在辩论中仍然处于次要地位。这一事实强化了女权主义视角的必要性,这种视角超越了分析变量来看待性别。