Sacred green spaces in semi-urban areas sustain more birds than its adjacent areas: A study from lower Gangetic plains, West Bengal, India

IF 0.4 Q4 ORNITHOLOGY
Antara Sarkar, Subhendu Mazumdar
{"title":"Sacred green spaces in semi-urban areas sustain more birds than its adjacent areas: A study from lower Gangetic plains, West Bengal, India","authors":"Antara Sarkar, Subhendu Mazumdar","doi":"10.2478/orhu-2022-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract With rapid urban expansion and flourishing real estate sector, remaining green patches in many sub-urban/peri-urban areas are facing immense threat and/or being destroyed. We therefore, explored the avian abundance and richness of green spaces around temples (sacred sites) and compared them with adjoining green spaces without religious places (control sites). The species richness and abundance in sacred sites (12.16 ± 0.65 species; 25.54 ± 1.176 individuals) was significantly higher than control sites (6.31 ± 0.77 species; 20.04 ± 1.4 individuals). The compositions of avian communities of sacred sites were significantly different and the presence of temple positively influenced the species richness. GLMM also revealed that the species richness was positively influenced by the distance to building and tree cover area and not influenced by distance to road, areas of water body, bare land. Our findings indicate that the green spaces around the sacred places have greater avian diversity in semi-urban areas, and could be prioritized for the conservation of avian diversity. Generating local support could be relatively easier due to traditional, religious and/or cultural belief against tree felling around the places of worship.","PeriodicalId":35966,"journal":{"name":"Ornis Hungarica","volume":"30 1","pages":"97 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ornis Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/orhu-2022-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORNITHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract With rapid urban expansion and flourishing real estate sector, remaining green patches in many sub-urban/peri-urban areas are facing immense threat and/or being destroyed. We therefore, explored the avian abundance and richness of green spaces around temples (sacred sites) and compared them with adjoining green spaces without religious places (control sites). The species richness and abundance in sacred sites (12.16 ± 0.65 species; 25.54 ± 1.176 individuals) was significantly higher than control sites (6.31 ± 0.77 species; 20.04 ± 1.4 individuals). The compositions of avian communities of sacred sites were significantly different and the presence of temple positively influenced the species richness. GLMM also revealed that the species richness was positively influenced by the distance to building and tree cover area and not influenced by distance to road, areas of water body, bare land. Our findings indicate that the green spaces around the sacred places have greater avian diversity in semi-urban areas, and could be prioritized for the conservation of avian diversity. Generating local support could be relatively easier due to traditional, religious and/or cultural belief against tree felling around the places of worship.
半城市地区神圣的绿地比邻近地区能容纳更多的鸟类:一项来自印度西孟加拉邦恒河下游平原的研究
随着城市的快速扩张和房地产业的蓬勃发展,许多城郊地区的剩余绿地面临着巨大的威胁和/或被破坏。因此,我们探索了寺庙(圣地)周围绿地的鸟类丰度和丰富性,并将它们与相邻的没有宗教场所的绿地(对照地点)进行了比较。圣地物种丰富度和丰度(12.16±0.65种;(25.54±1.176)种,显著高于对照组(6.31±0.77)种;20.04±1.4人)。不同宗教圣地鸟类群落组成差异显著,寺庙的存在对鸟类物种丰富度有正向影响。GLMM还显示,物种丰富度受建筑物距离和树木覆盖面积的正影响,而不受道路距离、水体面积和裸地的影响。研究结果表明,在半城市地区,宗教场所周边绿地具有较高的鸟类多样性,可作为鸟类多样性保护的优先选择。由于传统、宗教和/或文化信仰反对在礼拜场所周围砍伐树木,因此获得当地的支持相对容易一些。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ornis Hungarica
Ornis Hungarica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信