H. Ebrahimi, Hesam Azimi, Z. Kolahchi, Z. Gholami, Shahin Nasseri, Maryam Adib, A. Amirjamshidi, M. Shirani Bidabadi, A. Pour-Rashidi
{"title":"The Attitude of Neurosurgeons Toward Telemedicine During COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"H. Ebrahimi, Hesam Azimi, Z. Kolahchi, Z. Gholami, Shahin Nasseri, Maryam Adib, A. Amirjamshidi, M. Shirani Bidabadi, A. Pour-Rashidi","doi":"10.32598/irjns.9.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Telemedicine can be considered a primary modality of patient care for non-emergent conditions in the COVID-19 era. The usage and expansion of telemedicine are important and inevitable issues. We decided to investigate the neurosurgeons’ perspective on telemedicine in the treatment and follow-up of neurosurgical patients during the COVID-19 period. Methods and Materials/Patients: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Neurosurgery, Tehran, from June 2021 to July 2021. An internet-based questionnaire was distributed among all postgraduate and assistant neurosurgeons at the Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Statistical analysis was performed using SPPS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2016). Results: This study was performed among 74 neurosurgeons who were mainly male (89.2%). Their mean age was 33.16±5.69 years (ranging from 27 to 62 years), and telemedicine has not been used previously in 37 precipitants (50%). Most precipitants preferred telemedicine for follow-up (93.24%). The common reasons for unimplemented telemedicine were determined by insurance and repayment obstacles (58.11%). Most of the participants believed that telemedicine should first be adapted to working condition and local setting, then it can be applied more in the future. Eventually, the effectiveness of telemedicine was controversial, according to most neurosurgeons’ replies. Conclusion: This study indicated neurosurgeons’ preference for telemedicine. They considered it a comfortable alternative. However, the effectiveness of telemedicine is controversial as it should be adapted first and then used extensively for future purposes. It is also suggested that future studies compare the results of this research with those of studies performed after the COVID-19 outbreak.","PeriodicalId":53336,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/irjns.9.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Aim: Telemedicine can be considered a primary modality of patient care for non-emergent conditions in the COVID-19 era. The usage and expansion of telemedicine are important and inevitable issues. We decided to investigate the neurosurgeons’ perspective on telemedicine in the treatment and follow-up of neurosurgical patients during the COVID-19 period. Methods and Materials/Patients: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Neurosurgery, Tehran, from June 2021 to July 2021. An internet-based questionnaire was distributed among all postgraduate and assistant neurosurgeons at the Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Statistical analysis was performed using SPPS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2016). Results: This study was performed among 74 neurosurgeons who were mainly male (89.2%). Their mean age was 33.16±5.69 years (ranging from 27 to 62 years), and telemedicine has not been used previously in 37 precipitants (50%). Most precipitants preferred telemedicine for follow-up (93.24%). The common reasons for unimplemented telemedicine were determined by insurance and repayment obstacles (58.11%). Most of the participants believed that telemedicine should first be adapted to working condition and local setting, then it can be applied more in the future. Eventually, the effectiveness of telemedicine was controversial, according to most neurosurgeons’ replies. Conclusion: This study indicated neurosurgeons’ preference for telemedicine. They considered it a comfortable alternative. However, the effectiveness of telemedicine is controversial as it should be adapted first and then used extensively for future purposes. It is also suggested that future studies compare the results of this research with those of studies performed after the COVID-19 outbreak.
背景和目的:在新冠肺炎时代,远程医疗可以被视为非紧急情况下的主要患者护理方式。远程医疗的使用和扩展是重要且不可避免的问题。我们决定调查新冠肺炎期间神经外科医生对远程医疗在神经外科患者治疗和随访中的看法。方法和材料/患者:这项横断面研究于2021年6月至2021年7月在德黑兰神经外科进行。在德黑兰医学科学大学的所有研究生和助理神经外科医生中分发了一份基于互联网的问卷。使用SPPS(IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,版本24.0。纽约州Armonk:IBM公司;2016)。结果:本研究在74名神经外科医生中进行,他们主要是男性(89.2%)。他们的平均年龄为33.16±5.69岁(从27岁到62岁不等),37名患者(50%)以前没有使用过远程医疗。大多数患者更喜欢远程医疗进行随访(93.24%)。未实施远程医疗的常见原因是保险和还款障碍(58.11%)。大多数参与者认为远程医疗应首先适应工作条件和当地环境,然后才能在未来得到更多应用。根据大多数神经外科医生的回答,远程医疗的有效性最终引起了争议。结论:本研究表明神经外科医生对远程医疗的偏好。他们认为这是一个舒适的选择。然而,远程医疗的有效性存在争议,因为它应该首先进行调整,然后广泛用于未来的目的。还建议未来的研究将这项研究的结果与新冠肺炎爆发后的研究结果进行比较。