Exploring stationary and major modular construction challenges in developing countries: a case study of Egypt

IF 2.6 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. Ali, A. Kineber, A. Elyamany, Ahmed Hussein Ibrahim, Ahmed Osama Daoud
{"title":"Exploring stationary and major modular construction challenges in developing countries: a case study of Egypt","authors":"A. Ali, A. Kineber, A. Elyamany, Ahmed Hussein Ibrahim, Ahmed Osama Daoud","doi":"10.1108/jedt-03-2023-0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to identify the most significant barriers and the stationary barrier to modular construction (MC) implementation and promote MC widespread use. By doing so, the construction industry can leverage the benefits of MC, such as faster construction times, improved quality control, reduced waste and increased sustainability.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study uses a Gini’s mean analysis approach to identify the stationary barriers hindering the MC adoption in residential projects. The research focuses on the Egyptian context and uses a questionnaire survey to gather data from professionals in the construction industry.\n\n\nFindings\nAccording to the survey findings, the top five significant MC barriers are inability to modify the design; contractors asking for high bidding prices (higher initial cost); scepticism, conservation and resistance of clients to innovation and change; transportation restrictions; and lack of a one-size-fits-all tool for the design. In addition, Gini’s mean of dispersion demonstrated that the stationary barrier that faces MC adoption is the apprehension that architectural creativity will suffer because of MC.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe identified obstacles could be useful for decision makers in countries that have not yet adopted MC and may aid in the planning process to manage the risks associated with MC projects. The paper stresses the significance of devising techniques to overcome these barriers and proposes several methods to tackle these challenges.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study fills the knowledge gap by identifying the stationary barrier and emphasising the potential risks associated with MC barriers. Furthermore, it suggests several strategies for overcoming and reducing these barriers in developing countries residential projects.\n","PeriodicalId":46533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Design and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Design and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-03-2023-0099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to identify the most significant barriers and the stationary barrier to modular construction (MC) implementation and promote MC widespread use. By doing so, the construction industry can leverage the benefits of MC, such as faster construction times, improved quality control, reduced waste and increased sustainability. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a Gini’s mean analysis approach to identify the stationary barriers hindering the MC adoption in residential projects. The research focuses on the Egyptian context and uses a questionnaire survey to gather data from professionals in the construction industry. Findings According to the survey findings, the top five significant MC barriers are inability to modify the design; contractors asking for high bidding prices (higher initial cost); scepticism, conservation and resistance of clients to innovation and change; transportation restrictions; and lack of a one-size-fits-all tool for the design. In addition, Gini’s mean of dispersion demonstrated that the stationary barrier that faces MC adoption is the apprehension that architectural creativity will suffer because of MC. Practical implications The identified obstacles could be useful for decision makers in countries that have not yet adopted MC and may aid in the planning process to manage the risks associated with MC projects. The paper stresses the significance of devising techniques to overcome these barriers and proposes several methods to tackle these challenges. Originality/value This study fills the knowledge gap by identifying the stationary barrier and emphasising the potential risks associated with MC barriers. Furthermore, it suggests several strategies for overcoming and reducing these barriers in developing countries residential projects.
探索发展中国家的固定式和主要模块化建筑挑战:以埃及为例
目的本研究旨在确定模块化建筑(MC)实施的最重要障碍和固定障碍,并促进MC的广泛使用。通过这样做,建筑业可以利用MC的好处,例如更快的施工时间、改进的质量控制、减少浪费和提高可持续性。设计/方法/方法本研究使用基尼平均分析方法来确定阻碍住宅项目采用MC的固定障碍。该研究侧重于埃及的背景,并使用问卷调查从建筑行业的专业人士那里收集数据。调查结果显示,MC最大的五大障碍是无法修改设计;要求高投标价格(较高的初始成本)的承包商;客户对创新和变革的怀疑、保护和抵制;运输限制;以及缺乏用于设计的一刀切的工具。此外,Gini的离散均值表明,采用MC面临的固定障碍是担心建筑创意会因MC而受到影响。实际含义已确定的障碍可能对尚未采用MC的国家的决策者有用,并可能有助于规划过程中管理与MC项目相关的风险。本文强调了设计克服这些障碍的技术的重要性,并提出了应对这些挑战的几种方法。原创性/价值本研究通过识别固定障碍并强调与MC障碍相关的潜在风险来填补知识空白。此外,它还提出了一些克服和减少发展中国家住宅项目中这些障碍的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Design and Technology
Journal of Engineering Design and Technology ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: - Design strategies - Usability and adaptability - Material, component and systems performance - Process control - Alternative and new technologies - Organizational, management and research issues - Human factors - Environmental, quality and health and safety issues - Cost and life cycle issues - Sustainability criteria, indicators, measurement and practices - Risk management - Entrepreneurship Law, regulation and governance - Design, implementing, managing and practicing innovation - Visualization, simulation, information and communication technologies - Education practices, innovation, strategies and policy issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信