Infertility and Human Rights: A Jurisprudential Survey

Martha F. Davis, R. Khosla
{"title":"Infertility and Human Rights: A Jurisprudential Survey","authors":"Martha F. Davis, R. Khosla","doi":"10.7916/CJGL.V40I1.6847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article systematically explores the evolving human rights jurisprudence relating to infertility, a significant public health issue worldwide. There is no real question that the failure to prevent infertility, the failure to treat infertility, and the failure to recognize and respond to infertility, raise human rights concerns. But beyond the relevant human rights norms, we argue that human rights analyses can aid jurisdictions in structuring their responses to infertility. Through case studies and country-specific research, we adduce evidence that human rights norms are, in fact, already providing such guidance at the national level. The article further identifies a series of pending human rights challenges in the infertility arena – including the issue of “conditional childlessness” (also known as social infertility) – and offers suggestions for analyzing these issues.","PeriodicalId":84468,"journal":{"name":"Columbia journal of gender and law","volume":"40 1","pages":"1-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia journal of gender and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/CJGL.V40I1.6847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article systematically explores the evolving human rights jurisprudence relating to infertility, a significant public health issue worldwide. There is no real question that the failure to prevent infertility, the failure to treat infertility, and the failure to recognize and respond to infertility, raise human rights concerns. But beyond the relevant human rights norms, we argue that human rights analyses can aid jurisdictions in structuring their responses to infertility. Through case studies and country-specific research, we adduce evidence that human rights norms are, in fact, already providing such guidance at the national level. The article further identifies a series of pending human rights challenges in the infertility arena – including the issue of “conditional childlessness” (also known as social infertility) – and offers suggestions for analyzing these issues.
不孕不育与人权:一项法学调查
本文系统地探讨了与不孕症这一全球重大公共卫生问题有关的不断发展的人权法理学。毫无疑问,未能预防不孕症、未能治疗不孕症以及未能认识和应对不孕症引起了人权问题。但在相关的人权规范之外,我们认为人权分析可以帮助司法管辖区构建其对不孕症的反应。通过案例研究和针对具体国家的研究,我们提出证据表明,人权规范实际上已经在国家一级提供了这种指导。这篇文章进一步指出了不孕不育领域一系列悬而未决的人权挑战——包括“有条件的无子女”(也称为社会不孕)问题——并为分析这些问题提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信