Innovating pathology learning via Kahoot! game-based tool: a quantitative study of students` perceptions and academic performance

Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20905068.2021.1954413
Fatma Alzahraa Abdelsalam Elkhamisy, R. Wassef
{"title":"Innovating pathology learning via Kahoot! game-based tool: a quantitative study of students` perceptions and academic performance","authors":"Fatma Alzahraa Abdelsalam Elkhamisy, R. Wassef","doi":"10.1080/20905068.2021.1954413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction: Pathology learning for medical undergraduate students is a challenging task. Kahoot! is a mobile game-based online digital formative assessment tool that can engage students in its learning. This study is the first to assess the effect of Kahoot! use on Pathology learning outside classroom using a comparative group with assessment done at the end of the course. Methods: The study was carried out on the first-year Pathology students at Helwan University, Faculty of Medicine, after ending a basic Pathology course. The study is a retrospective quasi-experimental quantitative study. Academic performance of students in Pathology was compared between Kahoot! and non-Kahoot! users (55 students each). In addition, an online survey was introduced to the 55 Kahoot! user students to investigate their perceptions on it. Survey and test score data were analyzed by appropriate tests using IBM-SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences). The level of significance was P < 0.05. Results: Kahoot! enhanced Pathology understanding (83.6%), retaining knowledge (87.3%), made learning fun and motivating (89.1%). Other mentioned advantages of Kahoot! were practicing for exam (40%), simple and easy to use (36.4%), competitive (18.2%), self confidence booster (10.9%), forming a comprehensive image of the lecture (9%), quick (9%), and imagining skills booster (5.5%). Mentioned disadvantages included no explanation for the answers to questions (20%). A quarter of the students stated that the time limit for the questions was short (27.3%). Kahoot! use was significantly associated with better Pathology academic performance (P = 0.001), and it was not related to the general academic performance of the students (P = 0.06). Most users (85.4%) recommended its continuous future use. Conclusions: The study offers an endorsement to the use of Kahoot! for gamifying formative assessment of Pathology and can provide a basis for the design of an online Kahoot! -based continuous formative assessment plans implemented outside-classroom in the Pathology curricula.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20905068.2021.1954413","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20905068.2021.1954413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Pathology learning for medical undergraduate students is a challenging task. Kahoot! is a mobile game-based online digital formative assessment tool that can engage students in its learning. This study is the first to assess the effect of Kahoot! use on Pathology learning outside classroom using a comparative group with assessment done at the end of the course. Methods: The study was carried out on the first-year Pathology students at Helwan University, Faculty of Medicine, after ending a basic Pathology course. The study is a retrospective quasi-experimental quantitative study. Academic performance of students in Pathology was compared between Kahoot! and non-Kahoot! users (55 students each). In addition, an online survey was introduced to the 55 Kahoot! user students to investigate their perceptions on it. Survey and test score data were analyzed by appropriate tests using IBM-SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences). The level of significance was P < 0.05. Results: Kahoot! enhanced Pathology understanding (83.6%), retaining knowledge (87.3%), made learning fun and motivating (89.1%). Other mentioned advantages of Kahoot! were practicing for exam (40%), simple and easy to use (36.4%), competitive (18.2%), self confidence booster (10.9%), forming a comprehensive image of the lecture (9%), quick (9%), and imagining skills booster (5.5%). Mentioned disadvantages included no explanation for the answers to questions (20%). A quarter of the students stated that the time limit for the questions was short (27.3%). Kahoot! use was significantly associated with better Pathology academic performance (P = 0.001), and it was not related to the general academic performance of the students (P = 0.06). Most users (85.4%) recommended its continuous future use. Conclusions: The study offers an endorsement to the use of Kahoot! for gamifying formative assessment of Pathology and can provide a basis for the design of an online Kahoot! -based continuous formative assessment plans implemented outside-classroom in the Pathology curricula.
分享
查看原文
通过Kahoot创新病理学学习!基于游戏的工具:对学生认知和学习成绩的定量研究
摘要导读:医学本科学生的病理学学习是一项具有挑战性的任务。Kahoot !是一个基于移动游戏的在线数字形成性评估工具,可以让学生参与学习。这项研究首次评估了Kahoot!在病理学课堂外的学习中使用比较组,并在课程结束时进行评估。方法:以河南大学医学院病理学专业一年级学生为研究对象,在病理学基础课程结束后进行研究。本研究为回顾性准实验定量研究。比较了Kahoot!和non-Kahoot !用户(每人55名学生)。此外,一项在线调查被引入到55 Kahoot!用户学生调查他们对它的看法。采用IBM-SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences)软件对调查和考试成绩数据进行分析。显著性水平P < 0.05。结果:Kahoot !提高病理理解(83.6%),保留知识(87.3%),使学习变得有趣和激励(89.1%)。其他提到的优点。分别为考试练习(40%)、简单易用(36.4%)、好胜(18.2%)、自信提升(10.9%)、形成讲座综合形象(9%)、快速(9%)、想象技能提升(5.5%)。提到的缺点包括对问题的答案没有解释(20%)。四分之一的学生(27.3%)表示问题的时间限制很短。Kahoot !使用与病理学学习成绩显著相关(P = 0.001),与学生的一般学习成绩无关(P = 0.06)。大多数用户(85.4%)建议今后继续使用。结论:本研究为使用Kahoot!游戏化病理学的形成性评估,并可以为在线Kahoot的设计提供基础!在病理学课程的课堂外实施基于基础的持续形成性评估计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信