The Normativity of a Nation: A Case Study of Slovene Historians in Early Post-socialism

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Tjaša Konovšek
{"title":"The Normativity of a Nation: A Case Study of Slovene Historians in Early Post-socialism","authors":"Tjaša Konovšek","doi":"10.31577/forhist.2022.16.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"KONOVŠEK, Tjaša. The Normativity of a Nation: A Case Study of Slovene Historians in Early Post-socialism. This paper focuses on an issue many would consider a minor episode in Slovene historiography. A public discussion took place on the pages of Delo , one of the central Slovene newspapers in 1993, where some of the most prominent historians debated the relationship between the nation, politics and history, eventually roughly establishing two different world-views: one connected to past experiences and the other focused on the unknown of the future. Within the framework of conceptual history, this paper tackles the concept of “nation” as it was understood by these debaters themselves, establishing an understanding within the specific historical circumstances to which it belonged, thus histori-cizing the debate itself. While the question of 1989 as a break has generally already been well-researched with regard to politics, economy and memory, much less is known about the connections between the break, historiography and politics. Uncovering more than superficial disagreements within a community of historians, this paper aims not to be solely a contribution to the understanding of nationalism in post-socialism between a small group of people, but rather, to underline the link between a radically different view of the past among professional historians and the establishment of a new political and social order after 1989. Some historians involved realized the opportunity to directly channel their views into political and state-related activities, such as a bilateral commission and the educational system.","PeriodicalId":37228,"journal":{"name":"Forum Historiae","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum Historiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/forhist.2022.16.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

KONOVŠEK, Tjaša. The Normativity of a Nation: A Case Study of Slovene Historians in Early Post-socialism. This paper focuses on an issue many would consider a minor episode in Slovene historiography. A public discussion took place on the pages of Delo , one of the central Slovene newspapers in 1993, where some of the most prominent historians debated the relationship between the nation, politics and history, eventually roughly establishing two different world-views: one connected to past experiences and the other focused on the unknown of the future. Within the framework of conceptual history, this paper tackles the concept of “nation” as it was understood by these debaters themselves, establishing an understanding within the specific historical circumstances to which it belonged, thus histori-cizing the debate itself. While the question of 1989 as a break has generally already been well-researched with regard to politics, economy and memory, much less is known about the connections between the break, historiography and politics. Uncovering more than superficial disagreements within a community of historians, this paper aims not to be solely a contribution to the understanding of nationalism in post-socialism between a small group of people, but rather, to underline the link between a radically different view of the past among professional historians and the establishment of a new political and social order after 1989. Some historians involved realized the opportunity to directly channel their views into political and state-related activities, such as a bilateral commission and the educational system.
一个国家的规范性——以后社会主义早期斯洛文尼亚历史学家为例
KONOVŠEK,Tjaša。一个国家的规范性:后社会主义早期斯洛文尼亚历史学家的个案研究。本文关注的是一个许多人认为是斯洛文尼亚史学中一个小插曲的问题。1993年,斯洛文尼亚中央报纸之一《Delo》的版面上进行了一场公开讨论,一些最著名的历史学家在那里就国家、政治和历史之间的关系进行了辩论,最终大致建立了两种不同的世界观:一种与过去的经历有关,另一种关注未来的未知。在概念史的框架内,本文处理了这些辩手自己所理解的“国家”概念,在其所属的特定历史环境中建立了一种理解,从而将辩论本身历史化。虽然1989年的中断问题在政治、经济和记忆方面已经得到了很好的研究,但对中断、史学和政治之间的联系知之甚少。本文揭示的不仅仅是历史学家群体内部的表面分歧,它不仅有助于理解后社会主义时期少数人之间的民族主义,而且还强调了专业历史学家对过去截然不同的看法与1989年后新政治和社会秩序的建立之间的联系。一些历史学家意识到有机会将他们的观点直接引导到政治和国家相关活动中,例如双边委员会和教育系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forum Historiae
Forum Historiae Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信