Analysis of regional research competitiveness of medical subjects in China

中华医学科研管理杂志 Pub Date : 2019-10-21 DOI:10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.05.011

Peng Liao, G. Qiao, Jinzhong Jia, Zhifeng Wang

{"title":"Analysis of regional research competitiveness of medical subjects in China","authors":"Peng Liao, G. Qiao, Jinzhong Jia, Zhifeng Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo analyze the current status of research competitiveness of medical subjects in China. \n \n \nMethods \nAnalyzing the fund of Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) in 2017 and using the Range ratio and Theil Index to describe the dispersion and source of difference. Regional research competitiveness of Chinese medical subjects is measured by the attraction and accumulation capacity of NSFC. \n \n \nResults \nThe research competitiveness of medical subjects in East China and South China are stronger, and those in the Northwest are weaker. The distribution of medical funds mainly originated from the interior (88.88%), among which the East China and North China are the two regions with the largest contribution rate. In terms of provinces, Shanghai and Beijing have a much higher concentration of medical funds than other provinces. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe Research competitiveness in inter-regional medical subjects in China is quite different, and the differences mainly stem from the competition of internal provinces; the degree of advantages of medical subjects in regions is different, and there are medical research centers in ever regions. \n \n \nKey words: \nMedical subjects; Research competitiveness; NFSC","PeriodicalId":59555,"journal":{"name":"中华医学科研管理杂志","volume":"32 1","pages":"371-375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学科研管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.05.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To analyze the current status of research competitiveness of medical subjects in China. Methods Analyzing the fund of Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) in 2017 and using the Range ratio and Theil Index to describe the dispersion and source of difference. Regional research competitiveness of Chinese medical subjects is measured by the attraction and accumulation capacity of NSFC. Results The research competitiveness of medical subjects in East China and South China are stronger, and those in the Northwest are weaker. The distribution of medical funds mainly originated from the interior (88.88%), among which the East China and North China are the two regions with the largest contribution rate. In terms of provinces, Shanghai and Beijing have a much higher concentration of medical funds than other provinces. Conclusions The Research competitiveness in inter-regional medical subjects in China is quite different, and the differences mainly stem from the competition of internal provinces; the degree of advantages of medical subjects in regions is different, and there are medical research centers in ever regions. Key words: Medical subjects; Research competitiveness; NFSC

查看原文本刊更多论文

中国医学学科区域研究竞争力分析

目的分析中国医学学科科研竞争力的现状。方法分析2017年中国自然科学基金资助情况，采用极差比和Theil指数描述差异的离散度和来源。中医药学科的区域研究竞争力是通过国家自然科学基金的吸引力和积累能力来衡量的。结果华东、华南地区医学学科研究竞争力较强，西北地区较弱。医疗资金分布主要来源于内地(88.88%)，其中华东和华北是贡献率最大的两个地区。从省份来看，上海和北京的医疗资金集中度远高于其他省份。结论中国医学学科区域间的研究竞争力存在较大差异，这种差异主要源于内部省份的竞争;各地区医学学科优势程度不同，各地区均设有医学研究中心。关键词:医学学科;研究竞争力;NFSC

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

中华医学科研管理杂志

自引率

0.00%

发文量

3322