Laparoscopic or Open Appendectomy: Which Approach is the Best for Complicated Appendicitis?

Q4 Medicine
R. F. Jailani, Norjazliney A Jafri, G. Henry, I. Sagap
{"title":"Laparoscopic or Open Appendectomy: Which Approach is the Best for Complicated Appendicitis?","authors":"R. F. Jailani, Norjazliney A Jafri, G. Henry, I. Sagap","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Appendicitis is more common in children and young adults. Treatment of appendicitis is either laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) or open appendicectomy (OA) surgery. Aim and objective: The 30-day postoperative morbidity, surgical site infection, and reoperation rate were compared between open and laparoscopic appendicectomies for complicated appendicitis. Secondary outcome measures were the length of hospital stay, duration of surgery, surgical waiting time, identification of other diseases, and patient satisfaction. Materials and methods: This retrospective study was conducted in two institutions: Hospital Selayang, Selangor, Malaysia, and HUKM, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Data were collected from January 2014 to December 2015 were reviewed. Results: The mean age ( ± SD) for LA and OA were 32 ( ± 15) and 30 ( ± 14) years, respectively. The males showed predominance in LA and OA with 52 and 72%, respectively ( p < 0.001). The majority of LA (73%) and OA (88%) were performed by the trainees ( p < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in postoperative morbidity in LA compared to OA in terms of surgical site infection, LA vs OA [ n = 8 (2.7) vs 26 (6.3), p = 0.029] and duration of surgery [LA vs OA 84 ( ± 39) vs 68 ( ± 6) days ( p < 0.001)]. However, for LA and OA, there were no significant differences in reoperation, 0.7 and 1.0%, respectively ( p = 1.000), and length of stay in LA vs OA 3.55 ( ± 2) vs 3.89 ( ± 3) days, respectively ( p = 0.103). Overall, patient satisfaction scores were not found statistically significant as the response rates were only 32% in LA and 30% in OA. Conclusion: LA significantly reduced surgical site infection and offered an advantage in the detection of other pathologies. Hence, a laparoscopic approach should be offered to patients whose clinical diagnoses are challenging.","PeriodicalId":38741,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Appendicitis is more common in children and young adults. Treatment of appendicitis is either laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) or open appendicectomy (OA) surgery. Aim and objective: The 30-day postoperative morbidity, surgical site infection, and reoperation rate were compared between open and laparoscopic appendicectomies for complicated appendicitis. Secondary outcome measures were the length of hospital stay, duration of surgery, surgical waiting time, identification of other diseases, and patient satisfaction. Materials and methods: This retrospective study was conducted in two institutions: Hospital Selayang, Selangor, Malaysia, and HUKM, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Data were collected from January 2014 to December 2015 were reviewed. Results: The mean age ( ± SD) for LA and OA were 32 ( ± 15) and 30 ( ± 14) years, respectively. The males showed predominance in LA and OA with 52 and 72%, respectively ( p < 0.001). The majority of LA (73%) and OA (88%) were performed by the trainees ( p < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in postoperative morbidity in LA compared to OA in terms of surgical site infection, LA vs OA [ n = 8 (2.7) vs 26 (6.3), p = 0.029] and duration of surgery [LA vs OA 84 ( ± 39) vs 68 ( ± 6) days ( p < 0.001)]. However, for LA and OA, there were no significant differences in reoperation, 0.7 and 1.0%, respectively ( p = 1.000), and length of stay in LA vs OA 3.55 ( ± 2) vs 3.89 ( ± 3) days, respectively ( p = 0.103). Overall, patient satisfaction scores were not found statistically significant as the response rates were only 32% in LA and 30% in OA. Conclusion: LA significantly reduced surgical site infection and offered an advantage in the detection of other pathologies. Hence, a laparoscopic approach should be offered to patients whose clinical diagnoses are challenging.
腹腔镜还是开放性阑尾切除术:哪种方法对复杂的阑尾炎最好?
引言:阑尾炎在儿童和年轻人中更常见。阑尾炎的治疗方法是腹腔镜阑尾切除术或开放性阑尾切除术。目的:比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开放式阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎的术后30天发病率、手术部位感染率和再手术率。次要结果指标是住院时间、手术持续时间、手术等待时间、其他疾病的识别和患者满意度。材料和方法:这项回顾性研究在两个机构进行:马来西亚雪兰莪州雪兰阳医院和马来西亚吉隆坡HUKM。对2014年1月至2015年12月收集的数据进行了审查。结果:LA和OA的平均年龄(±SD)分别为32(±15)岁和30(±14)岁。男性在LA和OA中占优势,分别为52%和72%(p<0.001)。大多数LA(73%)和OA(88%)由受训者进行(p<001)。就手术部位感染而言,与OA相比,LA的术后发病率显著降低,LA与OA【n=8(2.7)vs 26(6.3),p=0.029】和手术持续时间【LA与OA 84(±39)vs 68(±6)天(p<0.001)】。然而,LA和OA的再次手术率分别为0.7%和1.0%(p=1.000),LA与OA的住院时间分别为3.55(±2)vs 3.89(±3)天(p=0.103),患者满意度得分没有统计学意义,因为LA的应答率仅为32%,OA的应答率为30%。结论:LA显著减少了手术部位感染,在其他病理的检测中具有优势。因此,应为临床诊断具有挑战性的患者提供腹腔镜方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信