Interiors of pedagogy

IF 0.2 4区 艺术学 N/A ARCHITECTURE
Toni Kauppila
{"title":"Interiors of pedagogy","authors":"Toni Kauppila","doi":"10.1080/20419112.2019.1573519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this text, I have elaborated my thoughts on some of the contemporary challenges in higher education and how they relate to teaching and learning within the discipline of the interiors. I see the field of interiors deeply rooted in multisensory ways of knowing. The predominant condition of the discipline in my view is a certain persistence towards ambiguity, towards a professional and creative field that is in constant state of being in-between and becoming. I have also elaborated that the embedded approach in education cannot fall under a specific theory of learning, but rather celebrate the diversity of activities in teaching and learning that go beyond singular didactics. I have structured the text around three case examples of different pedagogical situations in order to reflect on various teaching and learning conditions within interiors education. The examples wish to buttress the necessity for holistic discourse for comprehending the pedagogy of interiors, that span from encountering of an individual to curriculum development. I wish to draw attention to the potential in the discipline of interiors itself, that may embed inherent pedagogical qualities as abilities for shared approaches towards the uncertain; Interiors of pedagogy. Thus, arguing that the practice of interiors may leap far beyond vocational didactics as an active agent continuously defining its own way of learning. The text wishes to contribute further discussion on how to approach and find ways of knowing and learning in interiors. This hopefully springs debate around professional practice and pedagogy in higher education.","PeriodicalId":41420,"journal":{"name":"Interiors-Design Architecture Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20419112.2019.1573519","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interiors-Design Architecture Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20419112.2019.1573519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this text, I have elaborated my thoughts on some of the contemporary challenges in higher education and how they relate to teaching and learning within the discipline of the interiors. I see the field of interiors deeply rooted in multisensory ways of knowing. The predominant condition of the discipline in my view is a certain persistence towards ambiguity, towards a professional and creative field that is in constant state of being in-between and becoming. I have also elaborated that the embedded approach in education cannot fall under a specific theory of learning, but rather celebrate the diversity of activities in teaching and learning that go beyond singular didactics. I have structured the text around three case examples of different pedagogical situations in order to reflect on various teaching and learning conditions within interiors education. The examples wish to buttress the necessity for holistic discourse for comprehending the pedagogy of interiors, that span from encountering of an individual to curriculum development. I wish to draw attention to the potential in the discipline of interiors itself, that may embed inherent pedagogical qualities as abilities for shared approaches towards the uncertain; Interiors of pedagogy. Thus, arguing that the practice of interiors may leap far beyond vocational didactics as an active agent continuously defining its own way of learning. The text wishes to contribute further discussion on how to approach and find ways of knowing and learning in interiors. This hopefully springs debate around professional practice and pedagogy in higher education.
教育学的内在
在这篇文章中,我阐述了我对高等教育中一些当代挑战的看法,以及它们如何与室内学科中的教学和学习联系起来。我看到了深深植根于多感官认知方式的内在领域。在我看来,这门学科的主要条件是对模糊性的某种坚持,对一个不断处于中间和成为状态的专业和创造性领域的坚持。我还阐述了教育中的嵌入式方法不能属于特定的学习理论,而是庆祝超越单一教学方法的教与学活动的多样性。我围绕三个不同教学情况的案例构建了文本,以反映室内教育中的各种教学和学习条件。这些例子希望支持整体话语的必要性,以理解室内教学法,从个人的遭遇到课程发展。我希望引起人们对内部学科本身潜力的关注,这可能会将内在的教学品质作为对不确定的共享方法的能力;教育学的内部。因此,认为内饰的实践可能远远超越职业教学,作为一个积极的代理人,不断定义自己的学习方式。本文希望进一步讨论如何在室内探索和学习的方法。这有望引发关于高等教育专业实践和教学方法的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信