Ethics of research

IF 0.4 4区 综合性期刊 Q4 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
R. Seneviratne
{"title":"Ethics of research","authors":"R. Seneviratne","doi":"10.4038/jnsfsr.v51i2.11747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nEthical conduct of research involving humans has gained relevance and importance over the years with the expansion of research beyond boundaries of traditional medical and clinical research into a multiplicity of disciplines with human participation. Human research is regarded as research conducted on or with or about people, or their tissues or cells or data obtained from them.\nHistorically, it is stated that the Greek Philosopher Aristotle (384-322 BCE) was probably the first to discuss principles of ethics ‘by studying and offering criteria to assess human behaviour’. It is believed that he taught a course of ethics at the Lyceum during his mature years which was based on the many treatises he wrote on the subject. Increased attention to ethics in human research started after the Second World War following the judgment of the International Military Tribunal which also included 10 principles of permissible medical experiments which have since then been referred to as the Nuremburg Code (1949). Later discussions by the World Medical Assembly of the Code led to the adoption of the Helsinki Declaration (1964) which has been revised many times since then.\nThe Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) which in association with the World Health Organizations (WHO) undertook its work on ethics in biomedical research in late 1970s. It has published an updated version with a wider scope of coverage titled ‘International Ethical Guidelines for Health-Related Research Involving Humans’ (2016). Close cooperation with World Medical Assembly has ensured that the guidelines are closely aligned to the Helsinki Declaration. \n Traditionally, ethics has received much attention both in clinical practice and in health research. Faculties of Medicine were the first to establish ethics review boards and ethics review committees in Sri Lanka to undertake review of research proposals with human participation for ethical aspects and issues and granting approval. The primary aim is to safeguard the interests and right of participants of research and prevent their exploitation. There is no doubt about the value of health research and the benefits it has brought and will continue to bring to ensure health, wellbeing, safety and quality of life of people. Most research on human participants is simple, observational, descriptive and non-invasive and the ethical issues though may be minimal, still needs explicit attention and review by an ethics review board before approval. The more complex research where human participants are subject to ‘experimentation’ or ‘interventions’ has many ethical issues that need to assessed by recognized ethics review committees with experience and capability to do so.  If a new drug, a new vaccine, medicinal product, device, or equipment not already in use by people is to be tested on humans before being granted approval for use in day-to-day life by the appropriate authority, the researcher should adopt recommended procedures, regulations and registration mechanism prescribed. In Sri Lanka any interventional research requires applying and obtaining approval of ethics review committees that have been gazetted under the National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA) as being approved by name to undertake ethics review. The interventional research should also be registered with the Sri Lanka Clinical Trials Registry. Both these need to be submitted to the Clinical Trials Evaluation Committee of the NMRA in order to be evaluated prior to being granted approval and registration. These approvals and registrations are also requested by peer reviewed high impact journals to consider such research manuscripts for publication.  \nThere are certain values which provides the framework for principles guiding formulation of research proposals and ethics of research. These include and are not limited to respect, integrity, justice, beneficence and research merit. It is implicit in research that badly designed, conduced, analysed and reported research is unethical.  Clinical Centre researchers at National Institute of Health of USA have enunciated seven principles to guide the conduct of ethical research. These are social and clinical value, scientific validity, fair subject selection, favourable risk benefit ratio, independent review, informed consent, respect for potential and enrolled subjects. \nGiven the importance of scientific merit and integrity of research, good research practice needs much attention both by researchers and research institutions.  In order to meet these needs the National Health Research Council and the Education, Training and Research Unit of the Ministry of Health have taken steps to publish, ‘The Code of Conduct on Health Research in Sri Lanka’ (2018) (available at http://www.health.gov.lk/moh_final/english/public/elfinder/files/publications/2018/TheCodeofConduct.pdf).\nThe Code covers aspects of: formulation of research proposals; management of research data and primary materials; collaborative research; conflict of interest; supervision of research; peer review, and dissemination of research findings, publication and responsible authorship.\nWith the expansion of research on human participation into may other sciences such as branches of engineering, computing, bio technology, genetics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, nano technology and others, the ethical issues of human research have reached a new dimension. It has to be emphasized that whatever the branch of science or discipline, if the research requires human participants, then approval of an ethics review committee is a must. Thus, it behoves on research institutes, universities, and faculties to establish ethics review committees beyond the traditional practice of having ethics review committees in medical faculties. It is necessary that members of such a committee, functions within the set terms of references, standard operating procedures, ensure confidentiality and also have appropriate training in ethics of research, approval processes and documentation. In Sri Lanka too universities have gone one step ahead to establish ethics review committees at university level to facilitate research on humans in disciplines other than health and medical practice.\nTime has come when universities and research institutions take steps to develop codes of conduct on research, conduct courses on such practices and ethics of research for all researchers in order to safeguard the interests and safety of both researchers and participants of research.  \n ","PeriodicalId":17429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/jnsfsr.v51i2.11747","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ethical conduct of research involving humans has gained relevance and importance over the years with the expansion of research beyond boundaries of traditional medical and clinical research into a multiplicity of disciplines with human participation. Human research is regarded as research conducted on or with or about people, or their tissues or cells or data obtained from them. Historically, it is stated that the Greek Philosopher Aristotle (384-322 BCE) was probably the first to discuss principles of ethics ‘by studying and offering criteria to assess human behaviour’. It is believed that he taught a course of ethics at the Lyceum during his mature years which was based on the many treatises he wrote on the subject. Increased attention to ethics in human research started after the Second World War following the judgment of the International Military Tribunal which also included 10 principles of permissible medical experiments which have since then been referred to as the Nuremburg Code (1949). Later discussions by the World Medical Assembly of the Code led to the adoption of the Helsinki Declaration (1964) which has been revised many times since then. The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) which in association with the World Health Organizations (WHO) undertook its work on ethics in biomedical research in late 1970s. It has published an updated version with a wider scope of coverage titled ‘International Ethical Guidelines for Health-Related Research Involving Humans’ (2016). Close cooperation with World Medical Assembly has ensured that the guidelines are closely aligned to the Helsinki Declaration.  Traditionally, ethics has received much attention both in clinical practice and in health research. Faculties of Medicine were the first to establish ethics review boards and ethics review committees in Sri Lanka to undertake review of research proposals with human participation for ethical aspects and issues and granting approval. The primary aim is to safeguard the interests and right of participants of research and prevent their exploitation. There is no doubt about the value of health research and the benefits it has brought and will continue to bring to ensure health, wellbeing, safety and quality of life of people. Most research on human participants is simple, observational, descriptive and non-invasive and the ethical issues though may be minimal, still needs explicit attention and review by an ethics review board before approval. The more complex research where human participants are subject to ‘experimentation’ or ‘interventions’ has many ethical issues that need to assessed by recognized ethics review committees with experience and capability to do so.  If a new drug, a new vaccine, medicinal product, device, or equipment not already in use by people is to be tested on humans before being granted approval for use in day-to-day life by the appropriate authority, the researcher should adopt recommended procedures, regulations and registration mechanism prescribed. In Sri Lanka any interventional research requires applying and obtaining approval of ethics review committees that have been gazetted under the National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA) as being approved by name to undertake ethics review. The interventional research should also be registered with the Sri Lanka Clinical Trials Registry. Both these need to be submitted to the Clinical Trials Evaluation Committee of the NMRA in order to be evaluated prior to being granted approval and registration. These approvals and registrations are also requested by peer reviewed high impact journals to consider such research manuscripts for publication.  There are certain values which provides the framework for principles guiding formulation of research proposals and ethics of research. These include and are not limited to respect, integrity, justice, beneficence and research merit. It is implicit in research that badly designed, conduced, analysed and reported research is unethical.  Clinical Centre researchers at National Institute of Health of USA have enunciated seven principles to guide the conduct of ethical research. These are social and clinical value, scientific validity, fair subject selection, favourable risk benefit ratio, independent review, informed consent, respect for potential and enrolled subjects. Given the importance of scientific merit and integrity of research, good research practice needs much attention both by researchers and research institutions.  In order to meet these needs the National Health Research Council and the Education, Training and Research Unit of the Ministry of Health have taken steps to publish, ‘The Code of Conduct on Health Research in Sri Lanka’ (2018) (available at http://www.health.gov.lk/moh_final/english/public/elfinder/files/publications/2018/TheCodeofConduct.pdf). The Code covers aspects of: formulation of research proposals; management of research data and primary materials; collaborative research; conflict of interest; supervision of research; peer review, and dissemination of research findings, publication and responsible authorship. With the expansion of research on human participation into may other sciences such as branches of engineering, computing, bio technology, genetics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, nano technology and others, the ethical issues of human research have reached a new dimension. It has to be emphasized that whatever the branch of science or discipline, if the research requires human participants, then approval of an ethics review committee is a must. Thus, it behoves on research institutes, universities, and faculties to establish ethics review committees beyond the traditional practice of having ethics review committees in medical faculties. It is necessary that members of such a committee, functions within the set terms of references, standard operating procedures, ensure confidentiality and also have appropriate training in ethics of research, approval processes and documentation. In Sri Lanka too universities have gone one step ahead to establish ethics review committees at university level to facilitate research on humans in disciplines other than health and medical practice. Time has come when universities and research institutions take steps to develop codes of conduct on research, conduct courses on such practices and ethics of research for all researchers in order to safeguard the interests and safety of both researchers and participants of research.   
研究伦理
多年来,随着研究超越传统医学和临床研究的界限,扩展到人类参与的多种学科,涉及人类的研究的伦理行为具有了相关性和重要性。人体研究被认为是对人、对人、对人的组织、细胞或从人身上获得的数据进行的研究。从历史上看,希腊哲学家亚里士多德(公元前384-322年)可能是第一个“通过研究和提供评估人类行为的标准”来讨论伦理原则的人。人们相信,在他成熟的岁月里,他在学园教授了一门伦理学课程,这门课程是基于他写的许多关于这个主题的论文。第二次世界大战后,在国际军事法庭作出判决之后,人们开始更加关注人体研究中的伦理问题,其中还包括10项允许进行医学实验的原则,这些原则后来被称为《纽伦堡法典》(1949年)。后来,世界医学大会对《治罪法》进行了讨论,通过了《赫尔辛基宣言》(1964年),此后该宣言经过多次修订。国际医学组织理事会(医学组织理事会)与世界卫生组织(卫生组织)合作,于1970年代末开展了关于生物医学研究中的伦理问题的工作。它发布了一个更新版本,标题为“涉及人类健康相关研究的国际伦理准则”(2016年),涵盖范围更广。与世界医学大会的密切合作确保了这些准则与《赫尔辛基宣言》保持密切一致。传统上,伦理在临床实践和卫生研究中都受到重视。医学院率先在斯里兰卡建立了伦理审查委员会和伦理审查委员会,对人类参与的研究提案进行伦理方面和问题的审查,并予以批准。首要目的是维护研究参与者的利益和权利,防止他们受到剥削。毫无疑问,健康研究的价值以及它已经并将继续为确保人们的健康、福祉、安全和生活质量带来的好处。大多数对人类参与者的研究都是简单的、观察性的、描述性的和非侵入性的,伦理问题虽然可能是最小的,但在批准之前仍然需要明确的关注和伦理审查委员会的审查。对人类参与者进行“实验”或“干预”的更复杂的研究有许多伦理问题,需要由具有经验和能力的公认伦理审查委员会进行评估。如果一种尚未被人们使用的新药、新疫苗、医药产品、装置或设备在获得有关当局批准用于日常生活之前要在人体上进行试验,研究人员应采用建议的程序、规定和规定的注册机制。在斯里兰卡,任何干预性研究都需要申请并获得伦理审查委员会的批准,这些委员会已在国家药品管理局(NMRA)的宪报上公布,被批准进行伦理审查。干预性研究也应在斯里兰卡临床试验登记处注册。这两项都需要提交给NMRA的临床试验评估委员会,以便在获得批准和注册之前进行评估。这些批准和注册也被同行评审的高影响力期刊要求考虑这些研究手稿的出版。有一些价值观为指导研究建议的制定和研究伦理的原则提供了框架。这些包括但不限于尊重、诚信、正义、慈善和研究价值。设计、实施、分析和报告不当的研究是不道德的,这在研究中是不言而喻的。美国国立卫生研究院临床中心的研究人员阐明了指导伦理研究的七项原则。这些是社会和临床价值、科学有效性、公平的受试者选择、有利的风险效益比、独立审查、知情同意、尊重潜在和已登记的受试者。考虑到科学价值和科研诚信的重要性,良好的科研实践需要科研人员和科研机构的高度重视。为了满足这些需求,国家卫生研究委员会和卫生部教育、培训和研究股已采取措施出版了《斯里兰卡卫生研究行为准则》(2018年)(可在http://www.health.gov.lk/moh_final/english/public/elfinder/files/publications/2018/TheCodeofConduct.pdf上查阅)。 《守则》涵盖以下各方面:拟定研究建议;研究数据和原始资料的管理;合作研究;利益冲突;研究监督;同行评审,研究成果的传播,出版和负责任的作者。随着人类参与的研究扩展到许多其他科学领域,如工程、计算、生物技术、遗传学、人工智能、机器学习、纳米技术等分支,人类研究的伦理问题达到了一个新的层面。必须强调的是,无论科学或学科的哪个分支,如果研究需要人类参与者,那么必须得到伦理审查委员会的批准。因此,在传统的医学院系伦理审查委员会之外,研究机构、大学和院系应该建立伦理审查委员会。这样一个委员会的成员必须在规定的职权范围和标准作业程序内发挥作用,确保保密,并在研究、核准程序和文件方面接受适当的训练。在斯里兰卡,大学也先行一步,在大学一级建立了伦理审查委员会,以促进在卫生和医疗实践以外的学科中对人类的研究。大学和研究机构应该采取措施制定研究行为准则,为所有研究人员开设研究实践和研究伦理课程,以保障研究人员和研究参与者的利益和安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka (JNSF) publishes the results of research in Science and Technology. The journal is released four times a year, in March, June, September and December. This journal contains Research Articles, Reviews, Research Communications and Correspondences. Manuscripts submitted to the journal are accepted on the understanding that they will be reviewed prior to acceptance and that they have not been submitted for publication elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信