Effect of Compatible and Incompatible Endophytic Bacteria on Growth of Chickpea Plant

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Priyanka Batra, Monika Barkodia, Umang Ahlawat, R. Sansanwal, L. Wati
{"title":"Effect of Compatible and Incompatible Endophytic Bacteria on Growth of Chickpea Plant","authors":"Priyanka Batra, Monika Barkodia, Umang Ahlawat, R. Sansanwal, L. Wati","doi":"10.14429/dlsj.5.15119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chickpea is one of the important pulse crops among legumes due to its high protein content. During the last few decades chickpea production has declined because of various biotic and abiotic factors. To increase its production farmers are relying on the traditional methods (using chemical fertilizers) that pollute the environment. An alternative to chemical fertilizers is the eco-friendly process of endophytic inoculation. Compatible endophytic coinoculations improve plant growth as compared to single inoculation due to the synergistic performance of the constituent bacteria. In the current study, the compatibility of six bacterial inoculants (BM5 (rhizobial), BP2 and P36 (phosphate solubiliser), RE2, HE8, and ME9 (other endophytes) was tested. Among these bacterial inoculants, endophyte ME9 was found to be compatible with phosphate solubilising bacteria (P36) and rhizobial culture BM5. However, the endophytic bacteria RE2 and HE8 were found to be incompatible with phosphate solubilising bacteria and rhizobial bacteria. Further, individual inoculation, combined compatible and combined incompatible inoculants were applied to chickpea seeds in the pot house experiment. The results revealed that among all the inoculations, compatible bacterial consortia (ME9, P36 and BM5) produced highest increase in shoot (225%) and root dry weight (600 %) and grain weight (250 % ) compared to the control group. The incompatible inoculations were ineffective in improving the root dry weight, shoot dry weight, and grain weight in comparison to the respective individual inoculations.","PeriodicalId":36557,"journal":{"name":"Defence Life Science Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Defence Life Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14429/dlsj.5.15119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Chickpea is one of the important pulse crops among legumes due to its high protein content. During the last few decades chickpea production has declined because of various biotic and abiotic factors. To increase its production farmers are relying on the traditional methods (using chemical fertilizers) that pollute the environment. An alternative to chemical fertilizers is the eco-friendly process of endophytic inoculation. Compatible endophytic coinoculations improve plant growth as compared to single inoculation due to the synergistic performance of the constituent bacteria. In the current study, the compatibility of six bacterial inoculants (BM5 (rhizobial), BP2 and P36 (phosphate solubiliser), RE2, HE8, and ME9 (other endophytes) was tested. Among these bacterial inoculants, endophyte ME9 was found to be compatible with phosphate solubilising bacteria (P36) and rhizobial culture BM5. However, the endophytic bacteria RE2 and HE8 were found to be incompatible with phosphate solubilising bacteria and rhizobial bacteria. Further, individual inoculation, combined compatible and combined incompatible inoculants were applied to chickpea seeds in the pot house experiment. The results revealed that among all the inoculations, compatible bacterial consortia (ME9, P36 and BM5) produced highest increase in shoot (225%) and root dry weight (600 %) and grain weight (250 % ) compared to the control group. The incompatible inoculations were ineffective in improving the root dry weight, shoot dry weight, and grain weight in comparison to the respective individual inoculations.
亲和性和不亲和性内生细菌对鹰嘴豆植株生长的影响
鹰嘴豆蛋白质含量高,是豆科植物中重要的豆类作物之一。在过去的几十年里,鹰嘴豆的产量由于各种生物和非生物因素而下降。为了提高产量,农民们依赖于污染环境的传统方法(使用化肥)。一种替代化肥的方法是内生接种的环保过程。与单次接种相比,由于组成细菌的协同作用,相容的内生共接种提高了植物生长。在本研究中,测试了六种细菌接种物(BM5(根瘤菌)、BP2和P36(磷酸盐溶解剂)、RE2、HE8和ME9(其他内生菌)的兼容性。在这些细菌接种物中,发现内生菌ME9与磷酸盐溶解菌(P36)和根瘤菌培养物BM5相容。然而,内生细菌RE2和HE8被发现与磷酸盐溶解细菌和根瘤菌不相容。此外,在盆栽试验中,对鹰嘴豆种子进行了单独接种、组合相容和组合不相容接种。结果表明,在所有接种中,与对照组相比,相容菌群(ME9、P36和BM5)的地上部干重(225%)、根系干重(600%)和粒重(250%)增加最多。与各自的单独接种相比,不相容接种在提高根干重、茎干重和粒重方面无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Defence Life Science Journal
Defence Life Science Journal Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信