(Re) imagining the Problem of Racism: An Evangelical Response to Racism

Hendra Winarjo
{"title":"(Re) imagining the Problem of Racism: An Evangelical Response to Racism","authors":"Hendra Winarjo","doi":"10.36421/veritas.v21i2.600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to re-imagine and offer an evan­ge­lical response to the problem of racism that is not di­choto­mous, but holistic, where racism is understood both as an individual and structural sin, leading to a balance between racial reconciliation and racial justice that needs to be con­sistent­ly practiced. This research indicates that evangelicals generally do not yet have a holistic imagination to understand racism. Hence efforts to fight this persisting problem are still one-sidedly inclined toward racial reconciliation. For this purpose, this article begins by analyzing the common yet problematic understanding and response by some evangelicals who emphasize racism as only an individual sin and racial reconciliation as a solution. The next step is to describe the importance of imagination, namely the capacity to con­cept­u­al­ize the problem of racism in its entirety by involving sensitivity to racist situations, interpretation of Scripture with virtues, and introspection of our position toward racism—all of which are used to understand the dual nature of racism and response against it. In the end, as I demonstrate that racism is both an individual and structural sin, evangelical churches thus need to strike a balance between racial reconciliation and racial justice if they want to handle the problem of racism well.","PeriodicalId":33647,"journal":{"name":"Veritas Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veritas Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36421/veritas.v21i2.600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to re-imagine and offer an evan­ge­lical response to the problem of racism that is not di­choto­mous, but holistic, where racism is understood both as an individual and structural sin, leading to a balance between racial reconciliation and racial justice that needs to be con­sistent­ly practiced. This research indicates that evangelicals generally do not yet have a holistic imagination to understand racism. Hence efforts to fight this persisting problem are still one-sidedly inclined toward racial reconciliation. For this purpose, this article begins by analyzing the common yet problematic understanding and response by some evangelicals who emphasize racism as only an individual sin and racial reconciliation as a solution. The next step is to describe the importance of imagination, namely the capacity to con­cept­u­al­ize the problem of racism in its entirety by involving sensitivity to racist situations, interpretation of Scripture with virtues, and introspection of our position toward racism—all of which are used to understand the dual nature of racism and response against it. In the end, as I demonstrate that racism is both an individual and structural sin, evangelical churches thus need to strike a balance between racial reconciliation and racial justice if they want to handle the problem of racism well.
《想象种族主义问题:福音派对种族主义的回应
这篇文章旨在重新想象并提供一种对种族主义问题的即时回应,这种回应不是单方面的,而是全面的,种族主义被理解为一种个人和结构性的罪恶,从而在种族和解和种族正义之间取得平衡,这需要持续实践。这项研究表明,福音派教徒通常还没有全面的想象力来理解种族主义。因此,解决这一持续存在的问题的努力仍然片面地倾向于种族和解。为此,本文首先分析了一些福音派教徒的共同但有问题的理解和反应,他们强调种族主义只是个人的罪过,种族和解是一种解决方案。下一步是描述想象力的重要性,即通过对种族主义情况的敏感性、对《圣经》的美德解读以及对我们对种族主义立场的反思来理解种族主义问题的整体能力——所有这些都被用来理解种族主义的双重性和对种族主义的回应,正如我所证明的那样,种族主义既是一种个人的罪恶,也是一种结构性的罪恶,因此,如果福音派教会想很好地处理种族主义问题,就需要在种族和解和种族正义之间取得平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书