Contemporary Basque Horror: Legado en los huesos (2019) and the Value of Regional Readings within National Traumas

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
Rebecca Wynne-Walsh
{"title":"Contemporary Basque Horror: Legado en los huesos (2019) and the Value of Regional Readings within National Traumas","authors":"Rebecca Wynne-Walsh","doi":"10.1080/10436928.2022.2075184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some of the most significant changes to the contemporary film industry are the new screen technologies and online streaming platforms that provide global reach to distinctly local productions. One of the key dangers in the globalized contemporary cinematic landscape is the occlusion of regional specificity in favor of the mainstream marketability of singular nation or genre-based categorizations. National frameworks, though not without their benefits, conflate heterogenous intranational regional identities and, as an extension, cinematic outputs and thus place interstitial cultural groups under peril of erasure. An oversubscription to the national as a singular concept triggers the silencing of the distinct and pluralistic regional cultures that exist within any given nation state. As Mette Hjort and Duncan Petrie insist, “there can be little doubt that film studies today requires models that go well beyond conceptions of the nation as a monadic entity” (1). Transnational film studies emerged as the dominant framework of studying the flows, exchanges, and hybridities across national borders and film industries. Transnationalism approaches the interstices of cinema with a large focus on multinational co-productions and distribution in an effort to “rethink” the problematic question of “world cinema.” Stephanie Dennison and Song Hwee Lim, for example, desire a more “positive definition of World Cinema,” one which “moves away from the iron grip of hierarchized binarism” in an effort to “create flexible geographies with no particular cinema occupying a central position” (10). Horror could benefit from similar conversations. The first two decades of the twenty-first century have seen a “boom” in the critical and commercial success of mainstream “quality” horror cinema, of which Scott Meslow cites The Conjuring (2013) and Get Out (2017) as key examples. As the genre has grown in popularity globally, the dominance of mainstream, that is to say","PeriodicalId":42717,"journal":{"name":"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory","volume":"33 1","pages":"115 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2022.2075184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some of the most significant changes to the contemporary film industry are the new screen technologies and online streaming platforms that provide global reach to distinctly local productions. One of the key dangers in the globalized contemporary cinematic landscape is the occlusion of regional specificity in favor of the mainstream marketability of singular nation or genre-based categorizations. National frameworks, though not without their benefits, conflate heterogenous intranational regional identities and, as an extension, cinematic outputs and thus place interstitial cultural groups under peril of erasure. An oversubscription to the national as a singular concept triggers the silencing of the distinct and pluralistic regional cultures that exist within any given nation state. As Mette Hjort and Duncan Petrie insist, “there can be little doubt that film studies today requires models that go well beyond conceptions of the nation as a monadic entity” (1). Transnational film studies emerged as the dominant framework of studying the flows, exchanges, and hybridities across national borders and film industries. Transnationalism approaches the interstices of cinema with a large focus on multinational co-productions and distribution in an effort to “rethink” the problematic question of “world cinema.” Stephanie Dennison and Song Hwee Lim, for example, desire a more “positive definition of World Cinema,” one which “moves away from the iron grip of hierarchized binarism” in an effort to “create flexible geographies with no particular cinema occupying a central position” (10). Horror could benefit from similar conversations. The first two decades of the twenty-first century have seen a “boom” in the critical and commercial success of mainstream “quality” horror cinema, of which Scott Meslow cites The Conjuring (2013) and Get Out (2017) as key examples. As the genre has grown in popularity globally, the dominance of mainstream, that is to say
当代巴斯克恐怖:Legado en los huesos(2019)和国家创伤中区域阅读的价值
当代电影业的一些最重大的变化是新的屏幕技术和在线流媒体平台,它们为独特的本地制作提供了全球影响力。全球化的当代电影格局中的一个关键危险是,区域性的特殊性被遮蔽,而有利于单一国家或基于类型的分类的主流市场性。国家框架,尽管并非没有好处,但将异质的国家内部地区身份和电影输出混为一谈,从而使间隙文化群体面临被抹去的危险。作为一个单一概念,对民族的过度认同会引发任何特定民族国家内存在的独特和多元的区域文化的沉默。正如Mette Hjort和Duncan Petrie所坚持的那样,“毫无疑问,今天的电影研究需要的模型远远超出了国家作为一个单一实体的概念”(1)。跨国电影研究成为研究跨国界和电影产业流动、交流和混合的主要框架。跨民族主义以跨国合拍和发行为重点,试图“重新思考”“世界电影”的问题。例如,Stephanie Dennison和Song Hwee Lim,希望有一个更“积极的世界电影定义”,一个“摆脱等级二元主义的铁腕”,努力“创造灵活的地理位置,没有特定的电影占据中心位置”(10)。恐怖可以从类似的对话中受益。21世纪的前二十年,主流“优质”恐怖电影在评论和商业上取得了成功,斯科特·梅斯洛引用了《招魂》(2013)和《脱身》(2017)作为关键例子。随着这一流派在全球范围内越来越受欢迎,也就是说,主流的主导地位
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory
LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信