First-Attempt Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate Using A Telescoping Steel Bougie

Evan D Schmitz, CA Usa La Jolla
{"title":"First-Attempt Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate Using A Telescoping Steel Bougie","authors":"Evan D Schmitz, CA Usa La Jolla","doi":"10.13175/SWJPCC004-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background There has been a renewed interest in using the plastic intubation bougie to facilitate first-attempt endotracheal intubation success. The sterile single-use telescopic steel bougie (AIROD) was invented to overcome the limitations of the plastic bougie which is easily deformed during storage. Methods This is a retrospective study involving critically ill patients who were intubated with the AIROD in the intensive care unit at a single institution. The purpose of this case series is to compare the success rate of the AIROD to the generally accepted success rate for the traditional plastic bougie of 96%. Results A total of 54 patients were enrolled at a single ICU over a 10 months period. All patients were critically ill with 76% having a difficult airway, Cormack-Lehane grade view 2 or greater in 60%, and ARDS secondary to COVID-19 in 54%. The primary outcome of first-attempt intubation success in critically ill patients intubated in the ICU with the AIROD was 97% with a 95% confidence interval of 0.89 to 0.99. The average time for intubation of all airway classifications was 15 seconds. Conclusion The AIROD first-attempt intubation success rate was found to be similar to the rate for the traditional plastic bougie.","PeriodicalId":87365,"journal":{"name":"Southwest journal of pulmonary & critical care","volume":"22 1","pages":"36-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southwest journal of pulmonary & critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13175/SWJPCC004-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background There has been a renewed interest in using the plastic intubation bougie to facilitate first-attempt endotracheal intubation success. The sterile single-use telescopic steel bougie (AIROD) was invented to overcome the limitations of the plastic bougie which is easily deformed during storage. Methods This is a retrospective study involving critically ill patients who were intubated with the AIROD in the intensive care unit at a single institution. The purpose of this case series is to compare the success rate of the AIROD to the generally accepted success rate for the traditional plastic bougie of 96%. Results A total of 54 patients were enrolled at a single ICU over a 10 months period. All patients were critically ill with 76% having a difficult airway, Cormack-Lehane grade view 2 or greater in 60%, and ARDS secondary to COVID-19 in 54%. The primary outcome of first-attempt intubation success in critically ill patients intubated in the ICU with the AIROD was 97% with a 95% confidence interval of 0.89 to 0.99. The average time for intubation of all airway classifications was 15 seconds. Conclusion The AIROD first-attempt intubation success rate was found to be similar to the rate for the traditional plastic bougie.
伸缩式钢支架首次气管插管成功率分析
背景:人们对使用塑料插管弓来促进气管插管首次尝试的成功重新产生了兴趣。无菌一次性伸缩钢蹦床(AIROD)是为了克服塑料蹦床在储存过程中容易变形的缺点而发明的。方法本研究是一项回顾性研究,涉及在单一机构重症监护病房插管使用AIROD的危重患者。本案例系列的目的是将AIROD的成功率与传统塑料支架的96%的普遍接受的成功率进行比较。结果在10个月的时间内,共有54例患者在单个ICU登记。所有患者均为危重患者,76%的患者气道困难,60%的患者Cormack-Lehane分级为2级或以上,54%的患者继发于COVID-19的ARDS。使用AIROD在ICU插管的危重患者首次插管成功率为97%,95%可信区间为0.89 ~ 0.99。所有气道分类插管的平均时间为15秒。结论AIROD首次插管成功率与传统的塑料支槽相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信