Potential Health Hazards of Roadside Springs: Results from Central New York

IF 0.9 Q4 WATER RESOURCES
Christopher W. Sinton, Matthew Olivieri, Tara Perry, Katherine Stoddard, Ryan Kresge
{"title":"Potential Health Hazards of Roadside Springs: Results from Central New York","authors":"Christopher W. Sinton,&nbsp;Matthew Olivieri,&nbsp;Tara Perry,&nbsp;Katherine Stoddard,&nbsp;Ryan Kresge","doi":"10.1111/j.1936-704X.2021.3356.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Across the United States, groundwater springs adjacent to roadways have been developed as unregulated drinking water sources. We attempted to address two basic questions: 1) why do people collect water at these springs; and 2) is the water safe to drink? We conducted a study during 2015-2019 of seven springs in central New York State that included a survey of 199 users and analysis of the water for common dissolved constituents and bacteria. The survey of water users showed that over 70% of respondents use the springs at least multiple times per month for drinking water and the majority collect more than five gallons per visit. More than 80% of the users live farther than three miles from the springs and a recurring reason for drinking the spring water is that the taste is better than the water available at their homes. However, all the springs at some point tested positive for total coliform bacteria and all but one tested positive at least once for fecal coliform bacteria, meaning that 86% of the springs at some point did not meet U.S. municipal drinking water standards. None of the measured dissolved constituents exceeded drinking water standards, but one spring that exhibited elevated nitrate is downslope from a small cattle operation which may be affecting nutrient values in the water. Most of these springs appear to be fed by shallow, unconfined aquifers that are susceptible to contamination from nearby land uses that are not readily apparent from the roadside collection locations.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2021.3356.x","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2021.3356.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Across the United States, groundwater springs adjacent to roadways have been developed as unregulated drinking water sources. We attempted to address two basic questions: 1) why do people collect water at these springs; and 2) is the water safe to drink? We conducted a study during 2015-2019 of seven springs in central New York State that included a survey of 199 users and analysis of the water for common dissolved constituents and bacteria. The survey of water users showed that over 70% of respondents use the springs at least multiple times per month for drinking water and the majority collect more than five gallons per visit. More than 80% of the users live farther than three miles from the springs and a recurring reason for drinking the spring water is that the taste is better than the water available at their homes. However, all the springs at some point tested positive for total coliform bacteria and all but one tested positive at least once for fecal coliform bacteria, meaning that 86% of the springs at some point did not meet U.S. municipal drinking water standards. None of the measured dissolved constituents exceeded drinking water standards, but one spring that exhibited elevated nitrate is downslope from a small cattle operation which may be affecting nutrient values in the water. Most of these springs appear to be fed by shallow, unconfined aquifers that are susceptible to contamination from nearby land uses that are not readily apparent from the roadside collection locations.

Abstract Image

路边泉水的潜在健康危害:来自纽约中部的结果
在美国各地,公路附近的地下水泉已被开发为不受管制的饮用水源。我们试图解决两个基本问题:1)为什么人们要在这些泉水里取水;2)水可以安全饮用吗?我们在2015-2019年期间对纽约州中部的七个泉水进行了一项研究,其中包括对199名用户的调查,以及对水中常见溶解成分和细菌的分析。对用水者的调查显示,超过七成的受访者每月至少多次使用泉水取水,大多数人每次取水超过五加仑。超过80%的用户住在离泉水3英里以外的地方,他们喝泉水的一个反复出现的原因是,泉水的味道比他们家里的水好。然而,所有的泉水在某些时候都被检测出总大肠菌群呈阳性,除了一个以外,所有的泉水都至少有一次被检测出粪便大肠菌群呈阳性,这意味着86%的泉水在某些时候不符合美国市政饮用水标准。所有测量的溶解成分均未超过饮用水标准,但一处泉水显示硝酸盐含量升高,这可能影响了水中的营养价值。大多数泉水似乎是由浅层、无约束的含水层提供的,这些含水层容易受到附近土地使用的污染,而从路边收集地点看不出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信