Sacred Spaces and Disability: African Women Theology of Disability as Pastoral Praxis

IF 0.6 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Sinenhlanhla S. Chisale
{"title":"Sacred Spaces and Disability: African Women Theology of Disability as Pastoral Praxis","authors":"Sinenhlanhla S. Chisale","doi":"10.3366/swc.2023.0418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generally, all religions in Africa including Christianity are numerically dominated by women, yet women experience exclusion and oppression in sacred spaces. This oppression and exclusion are worse for women and girls with disabilities due to the ableist theologies perpetuated in spaces of worship. This is enforced by the regulations that govern the physical structures and boundaries of spaces of faith. As a result, religious spatial politics is intertwined with how the body physically and spiritually conforms to the regulations of a certain religion. In conservative forms of Christianity, the regulations that govern the structures and boundaries are informed by the Mosaic law, in particular the Leviticus or holiness code that emphasises purity and holiness of the body. The naive hermeneutics of the holiness code is used to exclude a body with a disability from sacred spaces: the exclusion is visible for women and girls with disabilities, because of the feminisation of religion and ableist hermeneutics of religion. Written from an African women theology of disability approach, the aim of this article is to explore how women with disabilities negotiate their faith in ableist Christian spaces of worship and to describe African women theology of disability as a pastoral praxis that has a potential for promoting inclusion in Christian spaces.","PeriodicalId":42820,"journal":{"name":"Studies in World Christianity","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in World Christianity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/swc.2023.0418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generally, all religions in Africa including Christianity are numerically dominated by women, yet women experience exclusion and oppression in sacred spaces. This oppression and exclusion are worse for women and girls with disabilities due to the ableist theologies perpetuated in spaces of worship. This is enforced by the regulations that govern the physical structures and boundaries of spaces of faith. As a result, religious spatial politics is intertwined with how the body physically and spiritually conforms to the regulations of a certain religion. In conservative forms of Christianity, the regulations that govern the structures and boundaries are informed by the Mosaic law, in particular the Leviticus or holiness code that emphasises purity and holiness of the body. The naive hermeneutics of the holiness code is used to exclude a body with a disability from sacred spaces: the exclusion is visible for women and girls with disabilities, because of the feminisation of religion and ableist hermeneutics of religion. Written from an African women theology of disability approach, the aim of this article is to explore how women with disabilities negotiate their faith in ableist Christian spaces of worship and to describe African women theology of disability as a pastoral praxis that has a potential for promoting inclusion in Christian spaces.
神圣空间与残疾:非洲女性残疾神学的牧灵实践
一般来说,包括基督教在内的非洲所有宗教在数量上都由妇女主导,但妇女在神圣的空间里却受到排斥和压迫。这种压迫和排斥对残疾妇女和女孩来说更为严重,因为在礼拜场所中长期存在着能人神学家。这是由管理信仰空间的物理结构和边界的规定来执行的。因此,宗教空间政治与身体在生理和精神上如何符合某种宗教的规定交织在一起。在保守的基督教形式中,管理结构和边界的规定是由摩西律法决定的,特别是强调身体纯洁和神圣的利未记或神圣法典。神圣法典的天真解释学被用来将残疾身体排除在神圣空间之外:这种排斥对残疾妇女和女孩来说是显而易见的,因为宗教的女性化和宗教的能力主义解释学。本文从非洲女性残疾神学的角度出发,旨在探讨残疾女性如何在有能力的基督教礼拜空间中协商自己的信仰,并将非洲女性残疾哲学描述为一种有可能促进基督教空间包容性的田园实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信