Sensitivity of fish habitat suitability to multi-resolution hydraulic modeling and field-based description of meso-scale river habitats

IF 3.1 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
David Farò , Katharina Baumgartner , Paolo Vezza , Guido Zolezzi
{"title":"Sensitivity of fish habitat suitability to multi-resolution hydraulic modeling and field-based description of meso-scale river habitats","authors":"David Farò ,&nbsp;Katharina Baumgartner ,&nbsp;Paolo Vezza ,&nbsp;Guido Zolezzi","doi":"10.1016/j.hydroa.2023.100160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In-stream habitat models at the meso-scale are increasingly used to quantify the effects of hydro-morphological pressures in rivers. The spatial distributions of water depth and velocity represent key attributes of physical habitat. Choosing between field surveys, hydraulic modeling or their integration is made depending on available tools, technical skills, budget and time. However, the sensitivity to such choices of estimated habitat conditions suitable for biological organisms, such as fish, is poorly known.</p><p>In this study, three commonly used approaches in hydraulic-habitat modeling were compared and tested on a mountain stream, the Mareta River (NE Italy). Two approaches were based on 2D hydraulic modeling, calculated on computational meshes with varying resolution and quality: (1) high-resolution meshes derived from topographical data obtained from Airborne Bathymetric LiDAR; (2) a mesh extrapolated from topographical cross-sectional profiles. The third approach (3) was based on in-stream surveys. From these, suitable channel-area for two fish species, the marble trout (juvenile and adult), and the European bullhead (adult), were estimated.</p><p>Results showed that decreasing mesh resolution and quality affects the simulated water depth and velocity distributions, both in terms of their average and their standard deviation. The largest differences were found for the in-stream survey-based results. Morphologically complex unit types, such as steps, rapids and pools were more sensitive than simpler mesohabitats, such as glides and riffles. The most sensitive hydro-morphological unit types to the chosen approach were backwaters, glides being the least sensitive, also in terms of their suitability as mesohabitats. Despite that, a key finding is that errors are minimized when deriving habitat - streamflow rating curves at the reach scale, for which all approaches were largely able to reproduce the main characteristics of the curve, i.e. maxima, minima and inflection points.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology X","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100160"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915523000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In-stream habitat models at the meso-scale are increasingly used to quantify the effects of hydro-morphological pressures in rivers. The spatial distributions of water depth and velocity represent key attributes of physical habitat. Choosing between field surveys, hydraulic modeling or their integration is made depending on available tools, technical skills, budget and time. However, the sensitivity to such choices of estimated habitat conditions suitable for biological organisms, such as fish, is poorly known.

In this study, three commonly used approaches in hydraulic-habitat modeling were compared and tested on a mountain stream, the Mareta River (NE Italy). Two approaches were based on 2D hydraulic modeling, calculated on computational meshes with varying resolution and quality: (1) high-resolution meshes derived from topographical data obtained from Airborne Bathymetric LiDAR; (2) a mesh extrapolated from topographical cross-sectional profiles. The third approach (3) was based on in-stream surveys. From these, suitable channel-area for two fish species, the marble trout (juvenile and adult), and the European bullhead (adult), were estimated.

Results showed that decreasing mesh resolution and quality affects the simulated water depth and velocity distributions, both in terms of their average and their standard deviation. The largest differences were found for the in-stream survey-based results. Morphologically complex unit types, such as steps, rapids and pools were more sensitive than simpler mesohabitats, such as glides and riffles. The most sensitive hydro-morphological unit types to the chosen approach were backwaters, glides being the least sensitive, also in terms of their suitability as mesohabitats. Despite that, a key finding is that errors are minimized when deriving habitat - streamflow rating curves at the reach scale, for which all approaches were largely able to reproduce the main characteristics of the curve, i.e. maxima, minima and inflection points.

鱼类栖息地适宜性对中尺度河流栖息地多分辨率水力建模和基于现场描述的敏感性
中尺度的河流生境模型越来越多地用于量化河流中水文形态压力的影响。水深和流速的空间分布代表了自然生境的关键属性。根据可用的工具、技术技能、预算和时间,在现场调查、水力建模或集成之间进行选择。然而,对诸如鱼类等生物有机体适宜的估计生境条件的这种选择的敏感性却知之甚少。在这项研究中,比较了三种常用的水力栖息地建模方法,并在意大利东北部的马雷塔河(Mareta River)山间溪流上进行了测试。两种方法基于二维水力建模,在不同分辨率和质量的计算网格上进行计算:(1)从机载测深激光雷达获得的地形数据中获得高分辨率网格;(2)从地形剖面推算出的网格。第三种方法(3)基于流内调查。据此,对大理鳟鱼(幼鱼和成鱼)和欧洲牛头鱼(成鱼)这两种鱼类的适宜河道面积进行了估计。结果表明,网格分辨率和质量的降低对模拟水深和速度分布的平均值和标准差都有影响。基于流内调查的结果差异最大。形态复杂的单元类型(如台阶、急流和水池)比简单的中生境(如滑梯和河床)更敏感。对选择的方法最敏感的水文形态单元类型是回水,最不敏感的是滑水道,也就其作为中生境的适用性而言。尽管如此,一个关键的发现是,在得出河段尺度的生境-水流等级曲线时,误差最小,所有方法都能在很大程度上再现曲线的主要特征,即最大值、最小值和拐点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology X
Journal of Hydrology X Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
20
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信