Concepts and Contexts of Creative Evaluation Approaches

Elisavet Christou, Violet Owen, Pinar Ceyhan
{"title":"Concepts and Contexts of Creative Evaluation Approaches","authors":"Elisavet Christou, Violet Owen, Pinar Ceyhan","doi":"10.56645/jmde.v17i40.675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Creative Evaluation (CE) is an unformed constellation of evaluation approaches that is based on varied understandings of creativity. Although creativity in evaluation has been consistently valued and needed by evaluation practitioners and researchers, the use of the term CE is currently limited in its applications as it has been developed inconsistently and often in isolation to the broader evaluation practice. The authors review examples where the term CE is being used, to present this constellation of approaches and group them under concepts and contexts, aiming at fostering an exploration into CE. \nPurpose: This paper examines the use of term Creative Evaluation by reviewing a set of examples from varied settings like educational programmes, cultural industries and social work and to present the reader with a better understanding about the contexts and concepts associated with CE. The authors discuss the transdiciplinary nature of evaluation along with a review of historical developments in evaluation theory and practice that help identify the emergence of responsive, flexible and problem-solving driven approaches to evaluation that can showcase a growing connection between creativity and evaluation. \nSetting: Not applicable. \nIntervention: Not applicable. \nResearch Design: Desk review was utilised for the preparation of this paper. \nFindings: There are different conceptualisations of the term CE applied in a variety of disciplinary and practice contexts. The term CE is used to describe both the process of applying creative thinking and the process of employing creative methods in the evaluation process. Creative thinking indicates a broader application of creativity that shapes the evaluation process and often results in the development of novel methods while creative methods indicate a more targeted use of methods that employ creative practices to achieve a specific evaluation goal like increasing engagement in the evaluation process. \nKeywords: creative evaluation; creative methods; creative approaches; transdisciplinary evaluation; evaluation","PeriodicalId":91909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v17i40.675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Creative Evaluation (CE) is an unformed constellation of evaluation approaches that is based on varied understandings of creativity. Although creativity in evaluation has been consistently valued and needed by evaluation practitioners and researchers, the use of the term CE is currently limited in its applications as it has been developed inconsistently and often in isolation to the broader evaluation practice. The authors review examples where the term CE is being used, to present this constellation of approaches and group them under concepts and contexts, aiming at fostering an exploration into CE. Purpose: This paper examines the use of term Creative Evaluation by reviewing a set of examples from varied settings like educational programmes, cultural industries and social work and to present the reader with a better understanding about the contexts and concepts associated with CE. The authors discuss the transdiciplinary nature of evaluation along with a review of historical developments in evaluation theory and practice that help identify the emergence of responsive, flexible and problem-solving driven approaches to evaluation that can showcase a growing connection between creativity and evaluation. Setting: Not applicable. Intervention: Not applicable. Research Design: Desk review was utilised for the preparation of this paper. Findings: There are different conceptualisations of the term CE applied in a variety of disciplinary and practice contexts. The term CE is used to describe both the process of applying creative thinking and the process of employing creative methods in the evaluation process. Creative thinking indicates a broader application of creativity that shapes the evaluation process and often results in the development of novel methods while creative methods indicate a more targeted use of methods that employ creative practices to achieve a specific evaluation goal like increasing engagement in the evaluation process. Keywords: creative evaluation; creative methods; creative approaches; transdisciplinary evaluation; evaluation
创造性评价方法的概念和背景
背景:创造性评价(CE)是一组尚未形成的评价方法,基于对创造力的不同理解。尽管评估从业者和研究人员一直重视和需要评估中的创造力,但CE一词的使用目前在其应用中受到限制,因为它的发展不一致,而且往往与更广泛的评估实践隔绝。作者回顾了使用CE一词的例子,介绍了这一系列方法,并将其分组在概念和背景下,旨在促进对CE的探索。目的:本文通过回顾教育计划、文化产业和社会工作等不同环境中的一组例子,来检验创造性评价一词的使用,并使读者更好地理解与CE相关的背景和概念。作者讨论了评估的跨学科性质,并回顾了评估理论和实践的历史发展,这有助于确定反应灵敏、灵活和解决问题驱动的评估方法的出现,这些方法可以展示创造力和评估之间日益增长的联系。设置:不适用。干预:不适用。研究设计:本论文的编写采用了案头审查。研究结果:CE一词在各种学科和实践背景下有不同的概念。CE一词用于描述在评估过程中应用创造性思维的过程和采用创造性方法的过程。创造性思维表明创造性的更广泛应用,它塑造了评估过程,并经常导致开发新的方法,而创造性方法表明更有针对性地使用方法,采用创造性实践来实现特定的评估目标,如增加对评估过程的参与。关键词:创造性评价;创新方法;创造性方法;跨学科评估;评价
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信